It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 10:12

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Wharton - ugly stats for 2007 internships

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jun 2007
Posts: 410

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 0

Schools: Wharton, Booth, Stern
Re: Wharton - ugly stats for 2007 internships [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2008, 19:09
cougarblue wrote:
Audio wrote:
cougarblue wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks that the notion of "the rich get richer, while the poor get poorer" is kind of ridiculous? The definition of "poor" or "middle-class" is completely arbitrary and is made even more useless when comparing different times in history. Why? Because a "middle-class" family in 1950 had like 1 car, a small house and 1 color TV. Now a middle-class family tries to have at least 2 cars, a McMansion and several flat-screens. How do you control for the gains in consumer standard of living? For instance, the fact that TVs keep getting bigger and more expensive doesn't necessarily mean that the "middle-class" labeled family should be able to spend the same proportionate income on such an item precisely because they are not anywhere close to the same item. They have now increased the standard of living. So, exactly how is it that the poor are getting poorer?

This comment made me smile. I don't know what a typical middle-class family looks like in the States (especially without any supporting studies), but in Europe a family with more than 1 car and 1 television is considered to be pretty well-off Therefore I have a hard time imagining that a middle-class family anywhere in the world would aim for 2 cars and multiple flat-screen TVs. But then again it's hard to tell without knowing the country.

The key operative word here is "tries" to have....doesn't mean they get it nor can they, increasingly, actually afford it (see: IOUSA.) However, I was being facetious in my description, which I thought was obvious. The larger point though is that the definition of middle-class is completely arbitrary anyway.

Totally agree with your last point. My comment was meant to be light-hearted in comparison with the other posts, apologies if it didn't get through that way.
_________________

Wharton admits, join the rugby team!! It'll be by far the best experience of your MBA life

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 0

Re: Wharton - ugly stats for 2007 internships   [#permalink] 29 Aug 2008, 19:09

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6   [ 101 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Wharton - ugly stats for 2007 internships

Moderators: OasisGC, aeropower, bb10

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.