Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

The lowest possible number divisible by the integers 1 through 7 will have the least possible number of primes. In this case:

2 (divisible by 2) 3 (divisible by 3) 2 (divisible by 4 - you already have one 2) 5 (divisible by 5) - (no need for a six, you already have a 2 and a 3) 7 (divisible by 7)

The lowest possible number divisible by the integers 1 through 7 will have the least possible number of primes. In this case:

2 (divisible by 2) 3 (divisible by 3) 2 (divisible by 4 - you already have one 2) 5 (divisible by 5) - (no need for a six, you already have a 2 and a 3) 7 (divisible by 7)

(2^2)(3)(5)(7) = 420 = A

How come 6 we don't use 2? We did for "4". 2 would be the lowest possible integer divisible by 6...

Maybe the simplest way would have been for me to start w/ A and divide by integers 1-7 and worked my way up.

"LCM of 6" would be #6 or otherwise #2*#3. Since we have #2 & #3 already represented in "LCM of 2, 3", "LCM of 6" would be duped.

"LCM of 4" is #4 or #2*#2. Are we including the other #2 from "LCM of 2" since #4 or any other combination does not make up #4?

Droopy, try to see it this way: You need to include as many primes needed to build the divisors. You invlude two 2s because that's what you need to make it divisible by 4.

You don't need to include those of 6 because you already have what you need, a 2 and a 3. This would be different if you needed the number to be divisible by 18. In this case, you would need an extra 3 (18 is made our of 2, 3, 3 and since you already have a 2 and a 3...)

That makes sense?

Also, although I wouldn't take this approach, I would use divisibility rules if I wanted to divide all the answer choices. However, I would advice for you to understand the concept, since you will definitely see questions regarding prime factorization, prime box...

Now let me ask you this. What's the least number that can be divisible by the integers 1-8 and 12? How many more primes and which ones do you need?

"LCM of 6" would be #6 or otherwise #2*#3. Since we have #2 & #3 already represented in "LCM of 2, 3", "LCM of 6" would be duped.

"LCM of 4" is #4 or #2*#2. Are we including the other #2 from "LCM of 2" since #4 or any other combination does not make up #4?

Droopy, try to see it this way: You need to include as many primes needed to build the divisors. You invlude two 2s because that's what you need to make it divisible by 4.

You don't need to include those of 6 because you already have what you need, a 2 and a 3. This would be different if you needed the number to be divisible by 18. In this case, you would need an extra 3 (18 is made our of 2, 3, 3 and since you already have a 2 and a 3...)

That makes sense?

Also, although I wouldn't take this approach, I would use divisibility rules if I wanted to divide all the answer choices. However, I would advice for you to understand the concept, since you will definitely see questions regarding prime factorization, prime box...

Now let me ask you this. What's the least number that can be divisible by the integers 1-8 and 12? How many more primes and which ones do you need?

Least # would be 420. We do not need any more primes b/c primes 3 and 4 are sufficient to be divisible by 12. {3, 4, 5, 7}= 420

On the other hand, if the number was 24, we would need an extra 2 to make it divisible by 24. {2, 3, 4, 5, 7}= 840

What is the lowest positive integer that is divisible by each of the integers 1 through 7, inclusive?

a) 420 b) 840 c) 1260 d) 2520 e) 5040

What is the fastest way to solve...

you have to find the least common multiple for all the integers from 1 to 7. So let's look at each of the number and try to break them down to their prime factors:

Then, because we're looking for the least common multiple, you should consider only the prime factors that have the highest number of exponents and then multiply them by each other. Therefore; \(2^2*3^1*5^1*7^1= 420\)