Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

that is exactly what I am saying... we do not need to think too much... no value of Y so no matter what info they give - you will never be able to know whats the value of X...

Perhaps I wasn't clear in my post above. Try to apply that line of reasoning to this question, which is different from the one in the original post above:

If y is positive, what is the value of x?

(1) The distance between x and y on the number line is equal to the distance between y and zero (2) On the number line, x is to the left of y

If you use the reasoning you're suggesting, you'll quickly choose 'E' and move on. The answer is not E, it's C; using both statements, x must be zero.

There are several real GMAT questions which seem to be specifically designed to trap test takers who use overly simplistic 'tricks' to guess at the right answer. Be careful.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

(i) Distance of x from y is the same as y from zero (ii) x is to the right of y

Don't go for absolute values while solving this one. Number line approach is much more easier. Also apart from these concepts, we can easily conclude that both the options together is not sufficient as none of them tells us any value of x or y. Anyway let's analyze it with number lines.

Statement 1: Implies either x is also equal to zero or x = 2y.

Not sufficient

Statement 2: We have only information that x > y.

Not sufficient

1 & 2 Together: Now either {y < 0 and x = 0} or {y > 0 and x = 2y}

Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance Gurome, Inc. 1-800-566-4043 (USA) +91-99201 32411 (India) http://www.facebook.com/Gurome

i) This tells us that 0,x&y are equally spaced. Many numbers will satisfy this condition. Example, x=8, y=4 or x=6, y=3. Not sufficient ii) Again, they could be any numbers. Same numbers picked in the above examples prove this. Insufficent.

i & ii together provide us with no new information. Hence insufficient.

Answer E.
_________________

My GMAT debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-620-to-710-my-gmat-journey-114437.html

we can easily conclude that both the options together is not sufficient as none of them tells us any value of x or y.

No, you cannot draw that conclusion reliably on a real GMAT question. First, the question does, in fact, mention a value, namely zero. It's also quite easy to reword the question so that the information is in fact sufficient, even without mentioning any value of x or y:

If y is positive, what is the value of x?

(1) The distance between x and y on the number line is equal to the distance between y and zero (2) On the number line, x is to the left of y

There's no mention of any values here besides zero, but the answer is C; using both statements, x must be zero. I'd find this version of the question more interesting (and more GMAT-like) than the version in the original post, since many people will simply pick E rather quickly and move on. Real GMAT DS questions are very often designed to trap the test taker who uses overly simplistic criteria to pick an answer; if you reason that "the question doesn't mention any values so the answer must be E", you'll be picking the wrong answer a lot of the time.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

we can easily conclude that both the options together is not sufficient as none of them tells us any value of x or y.

No, you cannot draw that conclusion reliably on a real GMAT question. First, the question does, in fact, mention a value, namely zero. It's also quite easy to reword the question so that the information is in fact sufficient, even without mentioning any value of x or y:

If y is positive, what is the value of x?

(1) The distance between x and y on the number line is equal to the distance between y and zero (2) On the number line, x is to the left of y

There's no mention of any values here besides zero, but the answer is C; using both statements, x must be zero. I'd find this version of the question more interesting (and more GMAT-like) than the version in the original post, since many people will simply pick E rather quickly and move on. Real GMAT DS questions are very often designed to trap the test taker who uses overly simplistic criteria to pick an answer; if you reason that "the question doesn't mention any values so the answer must be E", you'll be picking the wrong answer a lot of the time.

Ian,

In this question, we are not told whether y is positive or negative. If y is negative and x lies to the right of y, indeed x will be zero. But if y is positive, x will not be zero.

May I ask whether you have reworded the same question? If yes then why did you assume y is positive?
_________________

My GMAT debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-620-to-710-my-gmat-journey-114437.html

In this question, we are not told whether y is positive or negative. If y is negative and x lies to the right of y, indeed x will be zero. But if y is positive, x will not be zero.

May I ask whether you have reworded the same question? If yes then why did you assume y is positive?

Yes, as I wrote: "It's also quite easy to reword the question...". I added the condition y > 0 to illustrate that one cannot always glance at a question, say 'oh, the question doesn't mention any values so the answer is E' and hope to get the right answer all of the time; that only works some of the time.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

hmmm a question. if they never gave us any info about the value of Y - how can we know the value of X?

See, value is not actually necessary as pointed out by Ian. But there is actually no property of y mentioned either. So in the context of this question, we cannot find out the value for x. We can safely pick E.
_________________

My GMAT debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-620-to-710-my-gmat-journey-114437.html

that is exactly what I am saying... we do not need to think too much... no value of Y so no matter what info they give - you will never be able to know whats the value of X...
_________________

that is exactly what I am saying... we do not need to think too much... no value of Y so no matter what info they give - you will never be able to know whats the value of X...

Perhaps I wasn't clear in my post above. Try to apply that line of reasoning to this question, which is different from the one in the original post above:

If y is positive, what is the value of x?

(1) The distance between x and y on the number line is equal to the distance between y and zero (2) On the number line, x is to the left of y

If you use the reasoning you're suggesting, you'll quickly choose 'E' and move on. The answer is not E, it's C; using both statements, x must be zero.

There are several real GMAT questions which seem to be specifically designed to trap test takers who use overly simplistic 'tricks' to guess at the right answer. Be careful.

Good example. Of course many a GMAT question sets traps such as this. But if its mentioned in the problem that Y is positive, its not exactly same as the original question, where no property of Y is given to us. Right?
_________________

My GMAT debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-620-to-710-my-gmat-journey-114437.html

My question is regarding semantic interpretation of the question. First statement says:Distance of x from y is the same as y from zero. Why do we depict this statement as Ix-yI and not Iy-xI? If we presume that second version is acceptable, then the only value for x is 0. And thus the ans is A. What am I missing?

(i) Distance of x from y is the same as y from zero

Let x=0; y=-5 Distance from x to y=5 y to 0 = 5. Satisfies the condition. Value of x=0

Let x=0; y=5 Distance from x to y=5 y to 0 = 5 Satisfies the condition. Value of x=0

Let x=10; y=5 Distance from x to y = 5 y to 0 = 5 Satisfies the condition. Value of x=10

Let x=-10; y=-5 Distance from x to y = 5 y to 0 = 5 Satisfies the condition. Value of x=-10

We have three different values for x. 0,10,-10; Not sufficient.

(ii) x is to the right of y

Let x=0; y=-5 Distance from x to y=5 y to 0 = 5. Satisfies the condition that x is to the right of y. Value of x=0

Let x=10; y=5 Distance from x to y = 5 y to 0 = 5 Satisfies the condition that x is to the right of y. Value of x=10

Two values of x. Not sufficient.

Combining both; Let x=0; y=-5 Distance from x to y=5 y to 0 = 5. Satisfies both conditions that x is to the right of y and distance between x and y is same as distance between y and 0. Value of x=0

Let x=10; y=5 Distance from x to y = 5 y to 0 = 5 Satisfies both conditions that x is to the right of y and distance between x and y is same as distance between y and 0. Value of x=10

Two values of x. Not sufficient.

When algebra clouds my mind; I temporarily resort to the sample sets for the clarification.

******************

Had we considered the absolute value paradigm;

|x-y| = |y|

This means; x-y=-y x=0 OR(a big OR) x-y=y x=2y

|y-x| = |y|

This means; y-x=-y x=2y OR(a big OR) y-x=y x=0

Choose anyway; we have two different possible values for x for any value of y. x's exact value can't be determined with given conditions.

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

This month I got selected by Stanford GSB to be included in “Best & Brightest, Class of 2017” by Poets & Quants. Besides feeling honored for being part of...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...