GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 05 Dec 2019, 07:23

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# When a city experiences a sharp decline in population, the city's tax

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1048
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Re: When a city experiences a sharp decline in population, the city's tax  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jun 2017, 08:52
When a city experiences a sharp decline in population, the city's tax revenues, which pay for such city services as police protection and maintenance of water lines, also decrease. The area to be policed and the number and length of the water lines to be maintained, however, do not decrease. Attempting to make up the tax revenue lost by raising tax rates is not feasible, since higher tax rates would cause even more residents to leave.

The information given most strongly supports which of the following general claims?

A. If, in a city with sharply declining population, police protection and water line maintenance do not deteriorate, some other service previously provided by the city will deteriorate or be eliminated.

B. If a city's tax rates are held stable over a period of time, neither the population nor the levels of city services provided will tend to decline over that period. Not relevant

C. If a city's population declines sharply, police protection and water line maintenance are the services that deteriorate most immediately and most markedly. Can not be inferred properly

D. A city that suffers revenue losses because of a sharp decline in population can make up some of the lost tax revenue by raising tax rates, provided the city's tax rates are low in relation to those of other cities. Out of scope

E. A city that is losing residents because tax rates are perceived as too high by those residents can reverse this population trend by bringing its tax rates down to a more moderate level.
Not necessarily true
_________________
Please give kudos if you find my answers useful
Manager
Status: Aiming MBA!!
Joined: 19 Aug 2017
Posts: 101
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25
GPA: 3.75
WE: Web Development (Consulting)
Re: When a city experiences a sharp decline in population, the city's tax  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2017, 04:47
Vineetk wrote:
When a city experiences a sharp decline in population, the city's tax revenues, which pay for such city services as police protection and maintenance of water lines, also decrease. The area to be policed and the number and length of the water lines to be maintained, however, do not decrease. Attempting to make up the tax revenue lost by raising tax rates is not feasible, since higher tax rates would cause even more residents to leave.

The information given most strongly supports which of the following general claims?

A. If, in a city with sharply declining population, police protection and water line maintenance do not deteriorate, some other service previously provided by the city will deteriorate or be eliminated.
the given statements tell us that, with a smaller population, there will be less tax money available. if we spend the SAME amount of tax money on policing and water-line maintenance, then, less tax revenue will be available for everything else.

this implies choice A.

B. If a city's tax rates are held stable over a period of time, neither the population nor the levels of city services provided will tend to decline over that period.
the passage gives no support to this idea.
in fact, the passage supports the idea that population declines can just happen -- without ANY meaningful relation to tax rates. (the passage starts with "When a city experiences a sharp decline in population..." -- thus implying this is something that can just occur, without regard to what tax rates are doing at the time.)

Also, you can eliminate this choice just by pure common sense: it's a totally ridiculous statement in the real world. (obviously, just keeping tax rates constant isn't going to stop people from moving out of a city!).

C. If a city's population declines sharply, police protection and water line maintenance are the services that deteriorate most immediately and most markedly.
Nope. Also, MOST is a very strong word for INFERENCE Questions. Even here in this choice its too strong AND also the passage gives no support to this idea.

D. A city that suffers revenue losses because of a sharp decline in population can make up some of the lost tax revenue by raising tax rates, provided the city's tax rates are low in relation to those of other cities.
Not relevant/out of scope
E. A city that is losing residents because tax rates are perceived as too high by those residents can reverse this population trend by bringing its tax rates down to a more moderate level.
choice E should be a quick elimination, because choice E deals with a situation that is completely unrelated to anything described in any of the existing statements.
i.e., choice E describes a situation in which people CURRENTLY PERCEIVE tax rates as "too high". none of the existing choices deals with any such situation.
Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Posts: 169
Re: When a city experiences a sharp decline in population, the city's tax  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Mar 2019, 21:29

"A city that suffers revenue losses because of a sharp decline in population can make up some of the lost tax revenue by raising tax rates, provided the city's tax rates are low in relation to those of other cities."

I have read all the post still not convinced why D is wrong.

Say the tax rate is increased. But the increased tax rate is still lesser than other cities (so I thought residents will not leave because the tax rates are still low). Now with the increased tax rate, isn't it sure that the city would make up revenue greater than when the tax rates were not increased? Though it may not cover all the lost revenue by the decrease in population, it would make up at least partial revenue with an increase in tax rates.

Let the city have 50 people after 50 people left the city.Let the tax rate be 10%. Let the income be 1000.
So before the increase in tax rates the tax revenue is 50*1000*10%.

Now if the tax rates are increased by X%. The net tax rate is 10+x % which is lower than in other cities
So tax revenue collected is 50*1000*(10+x)
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1308
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 6: 600 Q38 V35
GPA: 3
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
Re: When a city experiences a sharp decline in population, the city's tax  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2019, 22:46
Although I selected (D) I now understand why it's incorrect.

The stem actually says "attempting to make up the tax revenue lost by raising tax rates is not feasible..." and (D) does not pass the fact test.

I had (A) as a contender answer, but thought it was too far of a step in logic to presume that other services would need to be cut to make-up for the shortfall.

Now I know my initial train of thinking was correct.
Intern
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 49
Location: India
Schools: Rotman '20
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 4
Re: When a city experiences a sharp decline in population, the city's tax  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2019, 22:41
Vineetk wrote:
When a city experiences a sharp decline in population, the city's tax revenues, which pay for such city services as police protection and maintenance of water lines, also decrease. The area to be policed and the number and length of the water lines to be maintained, however, do not decrease. Attempting to make up the tax revenue lost by raising tax rates is not feasible, since higher tax rates would cause even more residents to leave.

The information given most strongly supports which of the following general claims?

A. If, in a city with sharply declining population, police protection and water line maintenance do not deteriorate, some other service previously provided by the city will deteriorate or be eliminated.

B. If a city's tax rates are held stable over a period of time, neither the population nor the levels of city services provided will tend to decline over that period.

C. If a city's population declines sharply, police protection and water line maintenance are the services that deteriorate most immediately and most markedly.

D. A city that suffers revenue losses because of a sharp decline in population can make up some of the lost tax revenue by raising tax rates, provided the city's tax rates are low in relation to those of other cities.

E. A city that is losing residents because tax rates are perceived as too high by those residents can reverse this population trend by bringing its tax rates down to a more moderate level.

Reasoning What conclusion does the information suggest about cities in general? The information suggests that in cities, a population decline tends to reduce overall revenues that fund city services without reducing the need for two specific services: police protection and water lines. It also says that raising tax rates causes further population declines and does not raise revenues. But we are not told how overall revenues are distributed among city services, nor how the distribution might change. Even if overall funds decline, revenues for some specific city services could remain the same, while revenues for other services are severely cut.

A Correct. If police protection and water lines have not deteriorated as population has declined, then probably the funding for them has been preserved. Therefore, funding for some other services must be severely cut, since (as the argument states) making up tax revenue lost due to population decreases is not feasible.
B Although increased tax rates cause population declines, a city’s population and total tax revenue may decline for other reasons even if tax rates are stable.
C No specific information is given about how other city services would be affected by population declines. Therefore, we have no basis on which to compare any resulting deterioration to that of police protection and water lines.
D We are told that raising tax rates in a city with declining revenues does not increase revenues, and none of the information given suggests any exceptions to this principle.
E Reducing high tax rates to moderate levels may not attract many new residents, since other cities may have moderate tax rates as well; furthermore, those other cities may have better city services or other more attractive features.
Re: When a city experiences a sharp decline in population, the city's tax   [#permalink] 12 Jul 2019, 22:41

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 25 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# When a city experiences a sharp decline in population, the city's tax

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne