Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 25 Mar 2017, 04:44

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Nov 2006
Posts: 267
Location: California
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 0

When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2006, 00:15
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce patented technology, the consumer invariably loses. The company that holds the patent can charge exorbitant prices because there is no direct competition. When the patents expire, other companies are free to manufacture the technology and prices fall. Companies should therefore allow other manufacturers to license patented technology.

The argument above presupposes which of the following?

1. Companies cannot find legal ways to produce technology similar to patented technology.

2. Companies have an obligation to act in the best interest of the consumer.

3. Too many patents are granted to companies that are unwilling to share them.

4. The consumer can tell the difference between patented technology and inferior imitations.

If you have any questions
New!
VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1168
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2006, 01:00
2.

2 is needed because the reason that companies need to share the patent is not mentioned. it is asking for a reason that is good for the consumer.
Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 216
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2006, 07:27
Its B

2. Companies have an obligation to act in the best interest of the consumer.
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 391
Location: Boston, MA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2006, 08:05
(2)
Patents cause consumers to lose. Companies should allow other companies to use the patent technology. What is the initial assumption? That companies should care.
Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 710
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2006, 08:58
Yes it's B.
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 350
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

Re: CR_When a company refuses to allow ... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Dec 2006, 17:12
2 is the most direct assumption. The missing premise is related to why should companies share the patents.

mm007 wrote:
When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce patented technology, the consumer invariably loses. The company that holds the patent can charge exorbitant prices because there is no direct competition. When the patents expire, other companies are free to manufacture the technology and prices fall. Companies should therefore allow other manufacturers to license patented technology.

The argument above presupposes which of the following?

1. Companies cannot find legal ways to produce technology similar to patented technology.

2. Companies have an obligation to act in the best interest of the consumer.

3. Too many patents are granted to companies that are unwilling to share them.

4. The consumer can tell the difference between patented technology and inferior imitations.

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1131
Location: India
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2007, 02:05
buckkitty wrote:
(2)
Patents cause consumers to lose. Companies should allow other companies to use the patent technology. What is the initial assumption? That companies should care.

Exact reason for picking B.
_________________

Trying hard to conquer Quant.

Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 732
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2007, 07:58
one more B guys.
Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 179
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2007, 09:44
B for me as well.
_________________

Regards

Subhen

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Nov 2006
Posts: 267
Location: California
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2007, 14:29
OA is B..
Intern
Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Posts: 5
Location: USA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2007, 19:53
B   [#permalink] 04 Jan 2007, 19:53
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Company A and Company B both produce gold watches 1 23 Apr 2016, 02:06
2 When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce 6 31 Dec 2012, 19:20
1 Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to 1 07 Dec 2011, 01:36
A life insurance company allows people to prepay their 4 18 Aug 2009, 09:25
77 When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce 55 11 Mar 2009, 03:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by