It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 19:27

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 12 May 2004
Posts: 126

Kudos [?]: 98 [8], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 May 2005, 04:27
8
KUDOS
59
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (01:36) correct 42% (01:58) wrong based on 2096 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 69
Page: 144
Difficulty:

When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on nonevading taxpayers to become heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income.

The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?

(A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase their pretax incomes.
(B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost through evasion, bring in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from year to year.
(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion.
(D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax rates to stop hiding such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time.
(E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause them to evade taxes.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 98 [8], given: 0

Director
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 595

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2005, 14:11
Here are the choices:

(A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase
their pretax incomes.
(B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost
through evasion, bring in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from years to
year.
(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue,
they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion.
(D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax
rates to stop hiding such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time.
(E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause

Can somebody explain what does the question mean? I think it means 'if which of the following were true, then the vicious cycle will not happen?'
_________________

Regards, S

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 595

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2005, 14:19
ranga, can you plz explain the questiion and your answer c plz?
_________________

Regards, S

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1699

Kudos [?]: 480 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2005, 14:25
I think C is the right answer.

Because....When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for .... this is the reason the vicious cycle continues. If the lawmakes had adequate fund the problem stated would not exist.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 480 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 161

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2005, 14:26
saurya_s wrote:
Here are the choices:

(A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase
their pretax incomes.
(B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost
through evasion, bring in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from years to
year.
(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue,
they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion.
(D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax
rates to stop hiding such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time.
(E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause

Can somebody explain what does the question mean? I think it means 'if which of the following were true, then the vicious cycle will not happen?'

The question means which of the following answer is a must for the argument above. This means you need to pick one from the answer list such that it will give you a complete argument. The vicious cycle in the passage need one additional element to make it works.

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 477

Kudos [?]: 37 [1], given: 0

Location: Chicago

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2005, 14:26
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
saurya_s wrote:
ranga, can you plz explain the questiion and your answer c plz?

Viscious Cycle --> People evade tax so law makers make less revenue so they increase tax so more people evade tax

This cycle would not happen if law makers had given leeway for evaders and fixed the tax such a way that they will generate their income, in which case they dont have to increase their tax every year and more people will not start evading.
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Kudos [?]: 37 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2004
Posts: 99

Kudos [?]: 19 [7], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2005, 14:30
7
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?

(A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase
their pretax incomes.

Taxpayers would want to lower pretax
(B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost
through evasion, bring in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from years to
year.

If true, the cycle wouldn't be so "vicious"
(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue,
they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion.

CORRECT, lawmakers aren't allowing for lost revenue, thus the vicious cycle continues.

(D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax
rates to stop hiding such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time.

Fines are not mentioned.
(E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause
If taxpayers did not differ they all would evade, or they all wouldn't. There wouldn't be increases in evasion that resulted from increases in rates.

Kudos [?]: 19 [7], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 257

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Location: Las Vegas, NV

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2005, 17:24
I agree with ranga41. The argument falls apart when you apply the negation test to C.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 595

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2005, 02:06
I don't understand the meaning of question here? Seems to negative= not and unless? Can some one explain the meaning of unless?
_________________

Regards, S

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2007, 18:05
When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on nonevading taxpayers to become heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income.

The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?

(A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase their pretax incomes.

(B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost through evasion, bring in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from year to year.

(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion.

(D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax rates to stop hiding such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time.

(E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause them to evade taxes.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 179

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2007, 21:44
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
C - if the lawmakers had made reservations for people evading taxes the vicious cycle would not have occurred.

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 453

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2007, 23:48
I also go for C. That's the only choice that would keep the cycle going. All others has the possibility of breaking the cycle.

But what is the source? Doesnt look like a GMAT type question!!!

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 398

Kudos [?]: 304 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 May 2008, 02:53
When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion
forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on nonevading taxpayers to become
heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income.
The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?
(A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase their pretax
incomes.
(B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost through evasion, bring
in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from years to year.
(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion.
(D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax rates to stop hiding
such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time.
(E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause them to evade
taxes.

Kudos [?]: 304 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 13 Apr 2008
Posts: 64

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 May 2008, 03:37
lexis wrote:
When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion
forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on nonevading taxpayers to become
heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income.
The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?
(A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase their pretax
incomes.
(B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost through evasion, bring
in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from years to year.
(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion.

IF IRS does not consider this point the viscious cycle will happen. Hence its C.
(D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax rates to stop hiding
such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time.
(E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause them to evade
taxes.

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 127

Kudos [?]: 84 [3], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 May 2008, 06:03
3
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Cycle : Tax Evasion -> Taxes are raised -> Burden on nonevading tax payers -> more taxpayers evade taxes.
How can we break this cycle. Either by ensuring that there is absolutely no Tax Evasion by tax payers, or some way for lawmakers to not raise taxes at all despite evasion.

lexis wrote:
When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion
forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on nonevading taxpayers to become
heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income.
The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?

(A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase their pretax
incomes.
>> This does not break the chain in any way.

(B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost through evasion, bring
in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from years to year.
>> This can potentially reduce the tax evasion, but not sufficient for law makers to Not raise taxes or avoid evasion completely.

(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion.
>> If they establish rates in such a way that their revenues are met despite evasion, they are likely to not raise taxes which is what we were looking for to break the cycle.

(D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax rates to stop hiding
such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time.
>> If fines are raised potentiall evasion can be reduced, but we dont know if it can be eliminated 100%.

(E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause them to evade
taxes.
>> Even if taxpayers differ, ie. people with higher rates evade more often than people with lower rates. We still cant break the cycle.

Kudos [?]: 84 [3], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 357

Kudos [?]: 390 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2008, 07:01
When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion
forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on nonevading taxpayers to become
heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income.
The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?
(A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase their pretax
incomes.
(B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost through evasion, bring
in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from years to year.
(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow
adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion.
(D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax rates to stop hiding
such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time.
(E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause them to evade
taxes.

Kudos [?]: 390 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 933

Kudos [?]: 355 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2008, 07:10
IMO B.
If tax evading techniques catch the defaulters and produce net profit, then there is no need to raise tax.

Kudos [?]: 355 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2008, 11:57
IMO D

Lowering the tax rates or increasing the fine will invite evaders to pay tax properly and vicious cycle will not result.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 499

Kudos [?]: 250 [4], given: 4

Location: Eastern Europe
Schools: Oxford

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2008, 16:00
4
KUDOS
More variety :
I’d pick C.

Quote:
When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on nonevading taxpayers to become heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income.

The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?

We need to find a statement, a negation of which will break the ‘vicious circle’:

(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion. - This is it: if it is false, i.e. lawmakers allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion, then the statement that ‘Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates’ will also be false, and ‘a vicious cycle’ will not take place.

Kudos [?]: 250 [4], given: 4

Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 653

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2008, 17:59
greenoak wrote:
More variety :
I’d pick C.

Quote:
When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on nonevading taxpayers to become heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income.

The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?

We need to find a statement, a negation of which will break the ‘vicious circle’:

(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion. - This is it: if it is false, i.e. lawmakers allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion, then the statement that ‘Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates’ will also be false, and ‘a vicious cycle’ will not take place.

Another vote for C

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 55 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by