It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 08:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 15 Mar 2010
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 18 [2], given: 0

Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2010, 22:01
2
KUDOS
17
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

47% (01:40) correct 53% (02:15) wrong based on 669 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Hi Please try and answer this CR question. I am not able to apply correct logic. I am not really convinced with the answer key.

Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic increase in the number of airplane mishaps reported in the media, a phenomenon that may last for as long as a few months after the accident. Airline officials assert that the publicity given the gruesomeness of major airplane accidents focuses media attention on the airline industry, and the increase in the number of reported accidents is caused by an increase in the number of news sources covering airline accidents, not by an increase in the number of accidents.

Which of the following, if true, would seriously weaken the assertions of the airline officials?

A. The publicity surrounding airline accidents is largely limited to the country in which the crash occurred.

B. Airline accidents tend to occur far more often during certain peak travel months.

C. News organizations do not have any guidelines to help them decide how severe an accident must be for it to receive coverage.

D. Airplane accidents receive coverage by news sources only when the news sources find it advantageous to do so.

E. Studies by government regulations show that the number of airplane flight miles remains relatively constant from month to month.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by JarvisR on 14 Sep 2015, 01:43, edited 2 times in total.
Formatted & moved the comments under spoiler

Kudos [?]: 18 [2], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Aug 2009
Posts: 283

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 5

Location: India
Concentration: General Management
Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2010, 23:50
tanvid wrote:
Hi
Please try and answer this CR question. I am not able to apply correct logic. I am not really convinced with the answer key.

Question
Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic increase in the number of airplane mishaps reported in the media, a phenomenon that may last for as long as a few months after the accident. Airline officials assert that the publicity given the gruesomeness of major airplane accidents focuses media attention on the airline industry, and the increase in the number of reported accidents is caused by an increase in the number of news sources covering airline accidents, not by an increase in the number of accidents.

Which of the following, if true, would seriously weaken the assertions of the airline officials?

A. The publicity surrounding airline accidents is largely limited to the country in which the crash occurred.

B. Airline accidents tend to occur far more often during certain peak travel months.

C. News organizations do not have any guidelines to help them decide how severe an accident must be for it to receive coverage.

D. Airplane accidents receive coverage by news sources only when the news sources find it advantageous to do so.

E. Studies by government regulations show that the number of airplane flight miles remains relatively constant from month to month.

will go with B -peak travel time -more accidents - hence more media coverage
A and D - do not weaken the argument
C and E - irrelevant

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 5

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 356

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 15

Location: San Francisco
Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2010, 23:54
B

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 15

Intern
Joined: 15 Mar 2010
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2010, 00:29
kp1811 wrote:
tanvid wrote:
Hi
Please try and answer this CR question. I am not able to apply correct logic. I am not really convinced with the answer key.

Question
Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic increase in the number of airplane mishaps reported in the media, a phenomenon that may last for as long as a few months after the accident. Airline officials assert that the publicity given the gruesomeness of major airplane accidents focuses media attention on the airline industry, and the increase in the number of reported accidents is caused by an increase in the number of news sources covering airline accidents, not by an increase in the number of accidents.

Which of the following, if true, would seriously weaken the assertions of the airline officials?

A. The publicity surrounding airline accidents is largely limited to the country in which the crash occurred.

B. Airline accidents tend to occur far more often during certain peak travel months.

C. News organizations do not have any guidelines to help them decide how severe an accident must be for it to receive coverage.

D. Airplane accidents receive coverage by news sources only when the news sources find it advantageous to do so.

E. Studies by government regulations show that the number of airplane flight miles remains relatively constant from month to month.

will go with B -peak travel time -more accidents - hence more media coverage
A and D - do not weaken the argument
C and E - irrelevant

how come C is irrelevant. If news cant decide which accidents shud get coverage, that means that all the accidents are getting news coverage implying that the number of news and no of accidents is the same.
Pl correct if wrong

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Aug 2009
Posts: 283

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 5

Location: India
Concentration: General Management
Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2010, 00:51
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
tanvid wrote:
kp1811 wrote:
tanvid wrote:
Hi
Please try and answer this CR question. I am not able to apply correct logic. I am not really convinced with the answer key.

Question
Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic increase in the number of airplane mishaps reported in the media, a phenomenon that may last for as long as a few months after the accident. Airline officials assert that the publicity given the gruesomeness of major airplane accidents focuses media attention on the airline industry, and the increase in the number of reported accidents is caused by an increase in the number of news sources covering airline accidents, not by an increase in the number of accidents.

Which of the following, if true, would seriously weaken the assertions of the airline officials?

A. The publicity surrounding airline accidents is largely limited to the country in which the crash occurred.

B. Airline accidents tend to occur far more often during certain peak travel months.

C. News organizations do not have any guidelines to help them decide how severe an accident must be for it to receive coverage.

D. Airplane accidents receive coverage by news sources only when the news sources find it advantageous to do so.

E. Studies by government regulations show that the number of airplane flight miles remains relatively constant from month to month.

will go with B -peak travel time -more accidents - hence more media coverage
A and D - do not weaken the argument
C and E - irrelevant

how come C is irrelevant. If news cant decide which accidents shud get coverage, that means that all the accidents are getting news coverage implying that the number of news and no of accidents is the same.
Pl correct if wrong

my take is that guidelines should be from Aviation team to decide the severity of accidents and not that of the news channels so news channel guidelines become irrelevant as they may start covering every small problem reported

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 5

Intern
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 33

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2010, 08:48
B

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Manhattan Prep Instructor
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 347

Kudos [?]: 1643 [10], given: 11

Location: San Francisco
Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Mar 2010, 18:13
10
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hey Tanvid et. al.,

There seems to be enough confusion surrounding this to merit the full MGMAT treatment. So let's do it!

Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic increase in the number of airplane mishaps reported in the media, a phenomenon that may last for as long as a few months after the accident. Airline officials assert that the publicity given the gruesomeness of major airplane accidents focuses media attention on the airline industry, and the increase in the number of reported accidents is caused by an increase in the number of news sources covering airline accidents, not by an increase in the number of accidents.

Conclusion: Increase in reported accidents caused by increased media attention, not increased accidents
Premises: After major accident, dramatic increase in reported accidents
Assumption: There's not some other reason accidents may increase

This question fits nicely into a category we call "Eliminate alternate causes", in which case the assumption is always that there isn't some other cause. All we need to do is weaken that assumption, and we're good to go.

A. The publicity surrounding airline accidents is largely limited to the country in which the crash occurred.
PROBLEM: This doesn't change any of the facts as we know them. All we care about is the inarguable fact that reporting goes up after a major accident. It doesn't matter where.

B. Airline accidents tend to occur far more often during certain peak travel months.
ANSWER: This explains why there might be lots of accidents that arrive in groups: because of peak travel times. This means it actually is more accidents causing the increased coverage.

C. News organizations do not have any guidelines to help them decide how severe an accident must be for it to receive coverage.
PROBLEM: This means that reportage might be a bit arbitrary, but like answer choice A, it doesn't change the facts. We want to know WHY reporting of accidents goes up. To say that there is no guideline to connect severity to newsworthiness does NOTHING to address the issue of why reportage goes up after a major accident.

D. Airplane accidents receive coverage by news sources only when the news sources find it advantageous to do so.
PROBLEM: Still, we don't know WHY they would find it advantageous to report more airplane accidents at some time than at others, so this doesn't help us.

E. Studies by government regulations show that the number of airplane flight miles remains relatively constant from month to month.
PROBLEM: This actually strengthens the argument. If flight miles are constant, it wouldn't make sense for there to be more accidents at one time than another, so it must just be a question of reportage.

Hope that helps!

-t
_________________

Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Kudos [?]: 1643 [10], given: 11

Intern
Joined: 15 Mar 2010
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Mar 2010, 22:39
TommyWallach wrote:
Hey Tanvid et. al.,

There seems to be enough confusion surrounding this to merit the full MGMAT treatment. So let's do it!

Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic increase in the number of airplane mishaps reported in the media, a phenomenon that may last for as long as a few months after the accident. Airline officials assert that the publicity given the gruesomeness of major airplane accidents focuses media attention on the airline industry, and the increase in the number of reported accidents is caused by an increase in the number of news sources covering airline accidents, not by an increase in the number of accidents.

Conclusion: Increase in reported accidents caused by increased media attention, not increased accidents
Premises: After major accident, dramatic increase in reported accidents
Assumption: There's not some other reason accidents may increase

This question fits nicely into a category we call "Eliminate alternate causes", in which case the assumption is always that there isn't some other cause. All we need to do is weaken that assumption, and we're good to go.

A. The publicity surrounding airline accidents is largely limited to the country in which the crash occurred.
PROBLEM: This doesn't change any of the facts as we know them. All we care about is the inarguable fact that reporting goes up after a major accident. It doesn't matter where.

B. Airline accidents tend to occur far more often during certain peak travel months.
ANSWER: This explains why there might be lots of accidents that arrive in groups: because of peak travel times. This means it actually is more accidents causing the increased coverage.

C. News organizations do not have any guidelines to help them decide how severe an accident must be for it to receive coverage.
PROBLEM: This means that reportage might be a bit arbitrary, but like answer choice A, it doesn't change the facts. We want to know WHY reporting of accidents goes up. To say that there is no guideline to connect severity to newsworthiness does NOTHING to address the issue of why reportage goes up after a major accident.

D. Airplane accidents receive coverage by news sources only when the news sources find it advantageous to do so.
PROBLEM: Still, we don't know WHY they would find it advantageous to report more airplane accidents at some time than at others, so this doesn't help us.

E. Studies by government regulations show that the number of airplane flight miles remains relatively constant from month to month.
PROBLEM: This actually strengthens the argument. If flight miles are constant, it wouldn't make sense for there to be more accidents at one time than another, so it must just be a question of reportage.

Hope that helps!

-t

Its very clear now. Thanks a lot

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Retired Moderator
Status: Darden Class of 2013
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 1834

Kudos [?]: 393 [0], given: 37

Schools: University of Virginia
Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Mar 2010, 13:43
Nice explanation.

TommyWallach wrote:
Hey Tanvid et. al.,

There seems to be enough confusion surrounding this to merit the full MGMAT treatment. So let's do it!

Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic increase in the number of airplane mishaps reported in the media, a phenomenon that may last for as long as a few months after the accident. Airline officials assert that the publicity given the gruesomeness of major airplane accidents focuses media attention on the airline industry, and the increase in the number of reported accidents is caused by an increase in the number of news sources covering airline accidents, not by an increase in the number of accidents.

Conclusion: Increase in reported accidents caused by increased media attention, not increased accidents
Premises: After major accident, dramatic increase in reported accidents
Assumption: There's not some other reason accidents may increase

This question fits nicely into a category we call "Eliminate alternate causes", in which case the assumption is always that there isn't some other cause. All we need to do is weaken that assumption, and we're good to go.

A. The publicity surrounding airline accidents is largely limited to the country in which the crash occurred.
PROBLEM: This doesn't change any of the facts as we know them. All we care about is the inarguable fact that reporting goes up after a major accident. It doesn't matter where.

B. Airline accidents tend to occur far more often during certain peak travel months.
ANSWER: This explains why there might be lots of accidents that arrive in groups: because of peak travel times. This means it actually is more accidents causing the increased coverage.

C. News organizations do not have any guidelines to help them decide how severe an accident must be for it to receive coverage.
PROBLEM: This means that reportage might be a bit arbitrary, but like answer choice A, it doesn't change the facts. We want to know WHY reporting of accidents goes up. To say that there is no guideline to connect severity to newsworthiness does NOTHING to address the issue of why reportage goes up after a major accident.

D. Airplane accidents receive coverage by news sources only when the news sources find it advantageous to do so.
PROBLEM: Still, we don't know WHY they would find it advantageous to report more airplane accidents at some time than at others, so this doesn't help us.

E. Studies by government regulations show that the number of airplane flight miles remains relatively constant from month to month.
PROBLEM: This actually strengthens the argument. If flight miles are constant, it wouldn't make sense for there to be more accidents at one time than another, so it must just be a question of reportage.

Hope that helps!

-t

_________________

Kudos [?]: 393 [0], given: 37

Manager
Joined: 01 Oct 2010
Posts: 117

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 172

Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Dec 2010, 10:12
definitely B
_________________

I will greatly appreciate your KUDOS my friends!

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 172

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 487

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 149

WE 1: 4 years Tech
Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Dec 2010, 03:53
TommyWallach wrote:
Hey Tanvid et. al.,

There seems to be enough confusion surrounding this to merit the full MGMAT treatment. So let's do it!

Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic increase in the number of airplane mishaps reported in the media, a phenomenon that may last for as long as a few months after the accident. Airline officials assert that the publicity given the gruesomeness of major airplane accidents focuses media attention on the airline industry, and the increase in the number of reported accidents is caused by an increase in the number of news sources covering airline accidents, not by an increase in the number of accidents.

Conclusion: Increase in reported accidents caused by increased media attention, not increased accidents
Premises: After major accident, dramatic increase in reported accidents
Assumption: There's not some other reason accidents may increase

This question fits nicely into a category we call "Eliminate alternate causes", in which case the assumption is always that there isn't some other cause. All we need to do is weaken that assumption, and we're good to go.

A. The publicity surrounding airline accidents is largely limited to the country in which the crash occurred.
PROBLEM: This doesn't change any of the facts as we know them. All we care about is the inarguable fact that reporting goes up after a major accident. It doesn't matter where.

B. Airline accidents tend to occur far more often during certain peak travel months.
ANSWER: This explains why there might be lots of accidents that arrive in groups: because of peak travel times. This means it actually is more accidents causing the increased coverage.

C. News organizations do not have any guidelines to help them decide how severe an accident must be for it to receive coverage.
PROBLEM: This means that reportage might be a bit arbitrary, but like answer choice A, it doesn't change the facts. We want to know WHY reporting of accidents goes up. To say that there is no guideline to connect severity to newsworthiness does NOTHING to address the issue of why reportage goes up after a major accident.

D. Airplane accidents receive coverage by news sources only when the news sources find it advantageous to do so.
PROBLEM: Still, we don't know WHY they would find it advantageous to report more airplane accidents at some time than at others, so this doesn't help us.

E. Studies by government regulations show that the number of airplane flight miles remains relatively constant from month to month.
PROBLEM: This actually strengthens the argument. If flight miles are constant, it wouldn't make sense for there to be more accidents at one time than another, so it must just be a question of reportage.

Hope that helps!

-t

In C If the newschannels start reporting even minor air mishaps which they used to ignore earlier , the number os mishaps that are reported increases.What s wrong with this ciewpoint?
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 149

Manager
Status: what we want to do, do it as soon as possible
Joined: 24 May 2010
Posts: 108

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 315

Location: Vietnam
WE 1: 5.0
Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Mar 2011, 00:20
mundasingh123 wrote:
TommyWallach wrote:
Hey Tanvid et. al.,

There seems to be enough confusion surrounding this to merit the full MGMAT treatment. So let's do it!

Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic increase in the number of airplane mishaps reported in the media, a phenomenon that may last for as long as a few months after the accident. Airline officials assert that the publicity given the gruesomeness of major airplane accidents focuses media attention on the airline industry, and the increase in the number of reported accidents is caused by an increase in the number of news sources covering airline accidents, not by an increase in the number of accidents.

Conclusion: Increase in reported accidents caused by increased media attention, not increased accidents
Premises: After major accident, dramatic increase in reported accidents
Assumption: There's not some other reason accidents may increase

This question fits nicely into a category we call "Eliminate alternate causes", in which case the assumption is always that there isn't some other cause. All we need to do is weaken that assumption, and we're good to go.

A. The publicity surrounding airline accidents is largely limited to the country in which the crash occurred.
PROBLEM: This doesn't change any of the facts as we know them. All we care about is the inarguable fact that reporting goes up after a major accident. It doesn't matter where.

B. Airline accidents tend to occur far more often during certain peak travel months.
ANSWER: This explains why there might be lots of accidents that arrive in groups: because of peak travel times. This means it actually is more accidents causing the increased coverage.

C. News organizations do not have any guidelines to help them decide how severe an accident must be for it to receive coverage.
PROBLEM: This means that reportage might be a bit arbitrary, but like answer choice A, it doesn't change the facts. We want to know WHY reporting of accidents goes up. To say that there is no guideline to connect severity to newsworthiness does NOTHING to address the issue of why reportage goes up after a major accident.

D. Airplane accidents receive coverage by news sources only when the news sources find it advantageous to do so.
PROBLEM: Still, we don't know WHY they would find it advantageous to report more airplane accidents at some time than at others, so this doesn't help us.

E. Studies by government regulations show that the number of airplane flight miles remains relatively constant from month to month.
PROBLEM: This actually strengthens the argument. If flight miles are constant, it wouldn't make sense for there to be more accidents at one time than another, so it must just be a question of reportage.

Hope that helps!

-t

In C If the newschannels start reporting even minor air mishaps which they used to ignore earlier , the number os mishaps that are reported increases.What s wrong with this ciewpoint?

Simply "News organizations do not have access to infomation" in choice C does not influence the assertion made by the officials that :"airplane mishaps were not caused by an increase in the number of accidents".
_________________

Consider giving me kudos if you find my explanations helpful so i can learn how to express ideas to people more understandable.

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 315

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 871

Kudos [?]: 396 [0], given: 123

Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Mar 2011, 00:27
The reversal in causality said it all. when X-> Y needs to be weakened, first look for Y->X.

Kudos [?]: 396 [0], given: 123

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 624

Kudos [?]: 279 [0], given: 51

Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Apr 2011, 01:54
@ mgmat instructor, i still find your reasons for rejecting C and D debatable. but yes B makes more sense.
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Kudos [?]: 279 [0], given: 51

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 487

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 149

WE 1: 4 years Tech
Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Apr 2011, 02:30
garimavyas wrote:
@ mgmat instructor, i still find your reasons for rejecting C and D debatable. but yes B makes more sense.
mgmatinstructor has left gmatclub
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 149

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 258

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 4

Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 May 2011, 13:19
B

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 4

Intern
Joined: 13 Apr 2011
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2011, 11:24
There is one similar post.
The president of a consulting firm analyzed the decisions made about marketing by her clients and concluded that the decisions were correct only about half of the time.

The conclusion above depends on the presupposition that

(A) companies can be successful even when about half of the decisions they make about marketing prove to be wrong

(B) companies hiring her consulting firm make no more incorrect marketing decisions than do companies in general

(C) executives consistently making correct marketing decisions rarely enlist the aid of a consulting firm

(D) marketing decision are just as likely to be correct as they are to be incorrect

(E) it is possible to classify a marketing decision properly as being either right or wrong

I am not able to understand why D is incorrect as the OA is E.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1285

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 10

Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 May 2011, 00:05
Among B,C and D.

D actually strengthens the conclusion that the media is doing for their advantage. POE.

C No guidelines for coverage gives a slight hint that the accidents may be actually occurring instead. This is a slight over assumption.

B gives clearly that the accidents are actually happening.

However its a tough call between B and C.

E is more of an assumption answer choice removing the distance factor.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 10

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10118

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2014, 09:00
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10118

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Oct 2015, 05:18
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Re: Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic   [#permalink] 30 Oct 2015, 05:18

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 23 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by