It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 03:42

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 354

Kudos [?]: 238 [2], given: 16

Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2009, 04:40
2
KUDOS
38
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

26% (02:43) correct 74% (02:30) wrong based on 1635 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election and voters blame the scandal on all parties about equally, virtually all incumbents, from whatever party, seeking reelection are returned to office. However, when voters blame such a scandal on only one party, incumbents from that party are likely to be defeated by challengers from other parties. The proportion of incumbents who seek reelection is high and remarkably constant from election to election.

If the voters’ reactions are guided by a principle, which one of the following principles would best account for the contrast in reactions described above?

(A) Whenever one incumbent is responsible for one major political scandal and another incumbent is responsible for another, the consequences for the two incumbents should be the same.

(B) When a major political scandal is blamed on incumbents from all parties, that judgment is more accurate than any judgment that incumbents from only on party are to blame.

(C) Incumbents who are rightly blamed for a major political scandal should not seek reelection, but if they do, they should not be returned to office.

(D) Major political scandals can practically always be blamed on incumbents, but whether those incumbents should be voted out of office depends on who their challengers are.

(E) When major political scandals are less the responsibility of individual incumbents than of the parties to which they belong, whatever party was responsible must be penalized when possible.

Source: LSAT

[Reveal] Spoiler: OE
Check GMATNinja's explanation HERE

Here is the OE from Kaplan:

The roster of facts is tough to get through: Handle with care, and keep paraphrasing. When voters blame a scandal equally on all parties, almost all incumbents win reelection. But when a scandal is blamed on a single party, incumbents from that party tend to lose. (E)’s principle would explain such behavior. According to (E), if Party X is responsible for a scandal, voters should try to punish Party X by voting out its incumbents; however, if all the parties are responsible, there’s not much voters can do—whoever they vote for would be a member of one of the offending parties, so they might as well vote for the incumbents. Thus (E) accounts for the contrast in voter reactions.

(A) deals with what should happen to individual incumbents who are responsible for scandals, but the stimulus just describes how voters treat parties or incumbents as members of their parties.

(B) makes a judgment about the likely accuracy of the judgments of blame, but nothing of the kind is mentioned in the passage.

(C) makes the mistake of concentrating on individuals, instead of parties. Moreover, (C) runs contrary to the passage: According to (C), in cases where all parties are blamed for a scandal, all incumbents should be turned out.

(D) The passage doesn’t imply that voters evaluate the challengers. On the contrary, voters are depicted as making choices depending on what they believe about the incumbents’ parties.

• The question stem asks for a principle that would account for voter actions. The last sentence has nothing to do with voter’s actions, so it is essentially filler used to create wrong answer choices.
• The more complex a stimulus, the more important it is to paraphrase carefully. Don’t get bogged down in the author’s verbiage; instead, replace it with your own everyday language and images.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Lahoosaher

Last edited by broall on 03 Oct 2017, 21:16, edited 6 times in total.

Kudos [?]: 238 [2], given: 16

 Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount Codes Manhattan GMAT Discount Codes Veritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 354

Kudos [?]: 238 [0], given: 16

Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2009, 04:43
IMO E.

Other options go beyond the scope.
Could someone please explain the meaning of below phrases. I did not know the meaning and initially felt that the question was very difficult.

to seek reelection - does this mean that the incumbent seeks for reelection after he has lost one?
returned to office -
_________________

Lahoosaher

Kudos [?]: 238 [0], given: 16

Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2009
Posts: 16

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2009, 12:12
amolsk11 wrote:
IMO E.

Other options go beyond the scope.
Could someone please explain the meaning of below phrases. I did not know the meaning and initially felt that the question was very difficult.

to seek reelection - does this mean that the incumbent seeks for reelection after he has lost one?
returned to office -

Seeking reelection means the incumbent who is currently in office wants to serve another term.

Returned to office means that they have been re-elected.

I also agree with you that the answer is E.

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 354

Kudos [?]: 238 [0], given: 16

Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2009, 00:42
Thanks a lot for the explanation Lincfucious.
OA is E.
_________________

Lahoosaher

Kudos [?]: 238 [0], given: 16

Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 594

Kudos [?]: 1182 [0], given: 100

Location: Kolkata,India
Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2009, 17:00
D>eliminate.Dependence on challengers.
C>goes against.Eliminate.

_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/countdown-beginshas-ended-85483-40.html#p649902

Kudos [?]: 1182 [0], given: 100

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1283

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 10

Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 May 2011, 04:31
Made a judgement error in this.
Between D and E,picked up D instead since all the incumbents were involved in scandal was an assumption I made.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 10

Manager
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 226

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 55

Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2012, 06:17
I picked A and could not quite understand why it was E. Can anyone explain, please

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 55

Manager
Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP)
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 83 [8], given: 12

Location: New Delhi, India
Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2012, 06:31
8
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
gmatfighter12 wrote:
I picked A and could not quite understand why it was E. Can anyone explain, please

'Parts of the Whole' method is used to test on many different question types. If you spot it fast enough, the answers are very straightforward. The spotting here is that an incumbent is member (part) of a party (whole). If you've done this, just ask yourself these 2 questions:

If a certain Part has an attribute, is it necessary that the Whole has it?
If the Whole has a quality, is it necessary that each part has it?

Since the stimulus is a principle q, voters seem to adhere to q1 above and hence answer E.

You can use sports as a 'Parts of the Whole' analogy to see this: Phillies is the best team in the MLB. Therefore all its pitchers are the best pitchers in MLB. Is that logically right?
_________________

Best
Vaibhav

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, Thanks

Kudos [?]: 83 [8], given: 12

Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 192

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 22

Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2012, 08:01
narangvaibhav - Thank you very much for the explanation. It is extremely useful.

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 22

Manager
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 226

Kudos [?]: 55 [2], given: 55

Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2012, 08:50
2
KUDOS
Thanks for the answer. The reason why I had a hard time was the meaning of E. I could not quite understand what it is saying. And I found this

(E) When major political scandals are less the responsibility of individual incumbents than of the parties to which they belong,(scandal is blamed on the party, not the incumbent) whatever party was responsible must be penalized when possible (but if both are responsible then the incumbent will not necessarily be penalized).

http://www.top-law-schools.com/archives ... =6&t=44835

Kudos [?]: 55 [2], given: 55

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10131

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2015, 12:05
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Jun 2015
Posts: 79

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 9

WE: Design (Aerospace and Defense)
Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Dec 2015, 04:57
Quote:
Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election and voters blame the scandal on all parties about equally, virtually all incumbents, from whatever party, seeking reelection are returned to office. However, when voters blame such a scandal on only one party, incumbents from that party are likely to be defeated by challengers from other parties. The proportion of incumbents who seek reelection is high and remarkably constant from election to election.

If the voters’ reactions are guided by a principle, which one of the following principles would best account for the contrast in reactions described above?

(A) Whenever one incumbent is responsible for one major political scandal and another incumbent is responsible for another, the consequences for the two incumbents should be the same.
(B) When a major political scandal is blamed on incumbents from all parties, that judgment is more accurate than any judgment that incumbents from only on party are to blame.
(C) Incumbents who are rightly blamed for a major political scandal should not seek reelection, but if they do, they should not be returned to office.
(D) Major political scandals can practically always be blamed on incumbents, but whether those incumbents should be voted out of office depends on who their challengers are.
(E) When major political scandals are less the responsibility of individual incumbents than of the parties to which they belong, whatever party was responsible must be penalized when possible.

From the question what I understand is when both parties are involved, it is unlikely that the challenging party will be elected. But if only one party is involved in the scandal, then the likelihood of other party winning is more. Question stem is asking “best account for the contrast in reactions described above?” . How E is substantiating that contrast.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 9

Intern
Joined: 22 Sep 2014
Posts: 18

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Dec 2015, 14:26
E supports the 2nd part.... if only one party is involved in the scandal, then the likelihood of other party winning is more

but does it support the 1st part also ???? when both parties are involved, it is unlikely that the challenging party will be elected.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Jamboree GMAT Instructor
Status: GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 284

Kudos [?]: 320 [2], given: 1

Location: India
Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2015, 22:23
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
The argument says that when all parties are involved in the scandal no particular member of any party suffers the consequences but when a single party is involved the incumbents belonging to that party suffers defeat in the hand of the challengers."E" says that an incumbent is the member of a party. If the party is scandalised it does not imply each and every single incumbent is involved in the scandal or vice versa if the incumbent is to be blamed for the scandal then since the incumbent is the part of a party the whole party takes the responsibility.
_________________

Aryama Dutta Saikia
Jamboree Education Pvt. Ltd.

Kudos [?]: 320 [2], given: 1

VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1087

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 1030

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Mar 2017, 14:14
It seems this question should be rated at <700

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 1030

Intern
Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 154

Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2017, 22:04
hello experts,

kindly help us with the above question

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 154

Intern
Joined: 30 Dec 2016
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 27

Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2017, 22:47
can somebody explain the question ?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 27

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2013
Posts: 258

Kudos [?]: 166 [0], given: 350

Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2017, 21:23
Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election and voters blame the scandal on all parties about equally, virtually all incumbents, from whatever party, seeking reelection are returned to office. However, when voters blame such a scandal on only one party, incumbents from that party are likely to be defeated by challengers from other parties. The proportion of incumbents who seek reelection is high and remarkably constant from election to election.

If the voters’ reactions are guided by a principle, which one of the following principles would best account for the contrast in reactions described above?

(A) Whenever one incumbent is responsible for one major political scandal and another incumbent is responsible for another, the consequences for the two incumbents should be the same.
(B) When a major political scandal is blamed on incumbents from all parties, that judgment is more accurate than any judgment that incumbents from only one party are to blame.
(C) Incumbents who are rightly blamed for a major political scandal should not seek reelection, but if they do, they should not be returned to office.
(D) Major political scandals can practically always be blamed on incumbents, but whether those incumbents should be voted out of office depends on who their challengers are.
(E) When major political scandals are less the responsibility of individual incumbents than of the parties to which they belong, whatever party was responsible must be penalized when possible.
_________________

We Shall Overcome... One day...

Last edited by broall on 28 May 2017, 08:19, edited 2 times in total.
Merged topic. Please search before posting question.

Kudos [?]: 166 [0], given: 350

Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3372

Kudos [?]: 9283 [0], given: 1168

Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2017, 23:06
Top Contributor
Please format the question properly. Moreover, it was discussed here https://gmatclub.com/forum/whenever-a-m ... 83719.html and other times.

Use the search button before to create a new post. It is quite probable that the question on this board is posted already.

regards
_________________

Kudos [?]: 9283 [0], given: 1168

Manager
Joined: 22 Mar 2014
Posts: 151

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 136

Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GMAT 1: 530 Q45 V20
GPA: 3.91
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Apr 2017, 12:24
Please explain the ans.... I did not at all understand why 'E' should be the ans.... In my opinion the ans should be D.

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 136

Re: Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election   [#permalink] 26 Apr 2017, 12:24

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 30 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by