It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 13:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Which of the following best completes the passage below? The

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2011
Posts: 439

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 20

Location: Texas
Which of the following best completes the passage below? The [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jul 2011, 13:45
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

41% (01:00) correct 59% (01:03) wrong based on 46 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Which of the following best completes the passage below?

The 1906 San Francisco Earthquake destroyed over half the city and changed the development of the California economy, but much of the damage was actually caused by fire. It has been estimated that as much as 90% of the total destruction was a result of fire damage rather than movement of the earth. This figure is likely exaggerated, however, because the nearly universal practice of insuring San Francisco properties against fire but not earthquake damage all but guaranteed that .

A) most damage to the city was blamed on fire
B) the city would eventually be rebuilt
C) insurance companies were forced to offer earthquake coverage
D) residents subsequently moved to other cities where earthquake coverage was available
E) buildings not damaged by fire were never repaired

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 20

Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 554

Kudos [?]: 244 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2011, 01:06
Very hard lanaguage... The trick is to understand the last sentence.
I go with A.

This figure is likely exaggerated, however, because the nearly universal practice of insuring San Francisco properties against fire but not earthquake damage all but guaranteed that

Yes 90% is exaggerated number , but most of the buildings in SF are insured against fire and not Earth quakes. and building oqners will get the insurance money only if they claim that fire caused the destruction , not earth quake.

Kudos [?]: 244 [0], given: 13

Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 240

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 4

Schools: UNC Duke Kellogg

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2011, 12:20
A for me as well --- But the tone, construction and clarity of the question is very un-gmat like!

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 4

Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 440

Kudos [?]: 194 [0], given: 46

Location: United States (MA)

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2011, 12:40
A.

Simplifying the last sentence,

because of insuring properties against fire (but not earthquake damage) all but guaranteed that **most damage to the city was blamed on fire**

Kudos [?]: 194 [0], given: 46

Status: How can I crack Verbal
Joined: 12 May 2011
Posts: 206

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 33

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V32
GPA: 3

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2011, 15:09
As i read through the options, i checked the source of the Q bcoz the Q didn't seem like a GMAT type..
i chose A- last sentence of the argument indicates that nos are exaggerated bcoz of some reason and that reason was specified in A

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 33

Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Posts: 246

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 12

Schools: LBS, Oxford

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2011, 19:22
tricky language

I will go for A

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 12

Manager
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
Posts: 118

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE: General Management (Insurance)

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2011, 19:39
A. Whats the OA?

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Director
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 672

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 37

### Show Tags

09 Jul 2011, 00:17
A for me as well.

Crick

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 37

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 May 2010
Posts: 285

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 7

GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2011, 17:47
Although my gut feeling was A I am going to go with E.

Most buildings were destroyed by fire, not earthquake. There was insurance against fire, not earthquake. This all but guaranteed that buildings not destroyed by fire were not repaired.

As far as A is concerned we already know that most of the buildings were destroyed by fire. A just repeats what is said in the question.

But then again, E uses the word "never" repaired. And never is a strong word for GMAT CR. But I am going to stick with E.
_________________

If you like my post, consider giving me KUDOS!

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 7

Current Student
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 323

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 7

GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V46

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2011, 18:31
Clear A.

Need to give an explanation as to why the damage was exaggerated.

Since people insured against fire, and not earthquake, people would always claim damage was caused by fire.

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 7

Manager
Joined: 27 Dec 2007
Posts: 74

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2011, 01:54
If this is a connected sentence I will chose A.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 1

Status: How can I crack Verbal
Joined: 12 May 2011
Posts: 206

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 33

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V32
GPA: 3

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2011, 23:49
please post the OA and OE
Thanks

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 33

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 387

Kudos [?]: 102 [1], given: 13

Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V32

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2011, 21:56
1
KUDOS
I got it down as A. A tussle between A and E.
E said they never repaired the buildings. But it doesnt give a reason why the number was inflated.
I believe we need to take it that the value of 90% is taken from the insurance data which is why it is inflated.

Insurance data says it is 90%.
Actual figure is lower <90%. Why? Because everything is blamed on insurance even though it isnt.
IF we try and plug in E, we get Actual figure is <90% because those buildings not affected were not repaired. (But repairing is additional information from outside of the passage)

Kudos [?]: 102 [1], given: 13

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Apr 2011
Posts: 264

Kudos [?]: 679 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2011, 09:48
Would this be categorized as an assumption question?
_________________

Powerscore CR Bible Full Chapter Notes | Easily Extend Vocabulary List with Google Dictionary

Please kudo me if you found my post useful. Thanks!!!

Kudos [?]: 679 [0], given: 13

Intern
Joined: 04 Jul 2011
Posts: 24

Kudos [?]: 14 [1], given: 4

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2011, 11:42
1
KUDOS

There are estimates that 90% of the damage was fire damage, but this figure is exaggerated. Why? Because people blamed their damage on the fire in order to get insurance coverage whereas if they would have properly blamed it on the Earthquake, they would not have coverage.

E completes the sentence in an illogical way.

Let's examine why.

This figure is likely exaggerated, however, because the nearly universal practice of insuring San Francisco properties against fire but not earthquake damage all but guaranteed that buildings not damaged by fire were never repaired

No! It is conceivable that 90% of the builings could have been damaged by fire and the buildings not damaged by fire were never repaired. E) never tells us why the 90% figure is an exaggeration.

Not convinced? Ok, alternative process...examine the language. See the word "guranteed?" Not having fire coverage does nothing to gurantee that non-fire will not be rebuilt.

Still not convinced, Ok...here's the best explanation. The stimulus is ONLY dealing with FIRE and EARTHQUAKE damage. Answer choice E) deals with all non-fire related damage. What about buildings damaged by water? Maybe buildings are insured by that, but E would have you believe buildings damaged by water were never rebuilt. What about Wind damage? Same problem.

E) is overbroad and thus, incorrect.

Kudos [?]: 14 [1], given: 4

Manager
Joined: 14 Feb 2010
Posts: 159

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 8

Location: Banaglore

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2011, 21:26
I marked E, can some one please elaborate why E is wrong.

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 8

Manager
Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Posts: 107

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.65

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2011, 03:16
"A" clear

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: Destruction in SFO   [#permalink] 07 Aug 2011, 03:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Which of the following best completes the passage below? The

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.