It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 12:34

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1436

Kudos [?]: 349 [0], given: 0

Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2007, 15:55
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (01:38) correct 50% (00:05) wrong based on 10 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?

According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.

A. those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
B. even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
C. many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
D. after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
E. even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth

Kudos [?]: 349 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 782

Kudos [?]: 235 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2007, 16:29
IMO A

A offers an alternative explanation to the observation.

Kudos [?]: 235 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 1144

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2007, 17:01
I think it's (E)

This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.

even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth.

I ignored the other parts of the CR segment.

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1436

Kudos [?]: 349 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2007, 18:21
what's wrong with b?

Kudos [?]: 349 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2007
Posts: 196

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2007, 18:29
I couldn't decide between D and E. Think it's E though...

Last edited by ColumbiaDream on 29 Sep 2007, 18:42, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 523

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2007, 18:41
Clear E.

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2005
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2007, 20:54
bkk145 wrote:
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?

According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.

A. those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
B. even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
C. many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
D. after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
E. even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth

My pick A. It introduces another explanation that weakens the stated cause-effect relationship in the argument.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2005
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2007, 20:57
bkk145 wrote:
what's wrong with b?

it talks about moderately strict , though arg is about strict regulation and non-strict.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2554

Kudos [?]: 511 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2007, 21:03
bkk145 wrote:
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?

According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.

A. those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
B. even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
C. many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
D. after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
E. even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth

E: This establishes that environmental regulations are NOT the cause of economic growth.

Kudos [?]: 511 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 180

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2007, 02:09
i'll go for E

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1436

Kudos [?]: 349 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2007, 07:27
OA given for this is A
I thought A is irrelevant....

Kudos [?]: 349 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1367

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2007, 07:30
bkk145 wrote:
OA given for this is A
I thought A is irrelevant....

A???

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1545

Kudos [?]: 178 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2007, 07:42
A is actually what I had picked.

Stem starts off by saying that theory is that strict regulations = less growth.

Then it says that places with highest growth have the strictest regulations. Undermines the first premise.

Last sentence, author seems to think that there is something else causing the situation in sentence two, and so we need to look for an alternate explanation as to to why strict regulations = high growth.

A gives that

Kudos [?]: 178 [0], given: 2

VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1439

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2007, 07:43
Path wrote:
bkk145 wrote:
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?

According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.

A. those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
B. even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
C. many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
D. after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
E. even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth

My pick A. It introduces another explanation that weakens the stated cause-effect relationship in the argument.

Very nice..

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 13

SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1500

Kudos [?]: 1445 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2011, 14:04
Path wrote:
bkk145 wrote:
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?

According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.

A. those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
B. even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
C. many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
D. after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
E. even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth

My pick A. It introduces another explanation that weakens the stated cause-effect relationship in the argument.

Which is the "another explanation that weakens the stated C-E"?
In order to prove that Strict Regulation does not promote economic growth, we have to find other explanation that actually promotes the economic growth. A would be correct if it were "those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training, which is enough to promote the economic growth of a country"

Thanks.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1445 [0], given: 2

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 487

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 149

WE 1: 4 years Tech

### Show Tags

08 Jan 2011, 06:35
noboru is this LSAT ?
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 149

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3355

Kudos [?]: 9042 [0], given: 1152

Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jan 2011, 13:04
A has no sense. E has sense......any clue leads to E.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 9042 [0], given: 1152

SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1500

Kudos [?]: 1445 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2011, 13:16
mundasingh123 wrote:
noboru is this LSAT ?

No, is not. It's Gmat prep actually.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1445 [0], given: 2

MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4472

Kudos [?]: 16957 [0], given: 1961

Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2015, 18:01

Kudos [?]: 16957 [0], given: 1961

Re: Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most   [#permalink] 03 May 2015, 18:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by