It is currently 11 Dec 2017, 02:46

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 380

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 17

Location: Chicago, IL
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2010, 17:27
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (01:04) correct 50% (00:42) wrong based on 6 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

8.Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?
A.The employees of Manufacturer R lost more time at work due to job-related accidents than did the employees of Manufacturer S.
B.Manufacturer S considered more types of accidents to be job-related than did Manufacturer R.
C.The employees of Manufacturer R were sick more often than were the employees of Manufacturer S.
D.The majority of job-related accidents at Manufacturer R involved a single machine.
E.Several employees of Manufacturer R each had more than one job-related accident.

Disagree with OA.

Source:http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=433749&seqNum=7
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Hard work is the main determinant of success

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 17

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 953

Kudos [?]: 930 [0], given: 36

Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
Re: Job-related injuries [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2010, 23:30
Interesting question

Manufacturers R and S each have the same number of employees who work the same number of hours per week. According to records maintained by each manufacturer, the employees of Manufacturer R had more job-related accidents last month than did the employees of Manufacturer S. Therefore, employees of Manufacturer S are less likely to have job-related accidents than are employees of Manufacturer R.
# Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?
1. The employees of Manufacturer R lost more time at work due to job-related accidents than did the employees of Manufacturer S.
2. Manufacturer S considered more types of accidents to be job-related than did Manufacturer R.
3. The employees of Manufacturer R were sick more often than were the employees of Manufacturer S.
4. The majority of job-related accidents at Manufacturer R involved a single machine.
5. Several employees of Manufacturer R each had more than one job-related accident.

OA is correct. Option B directly attacks the counting technique used by manufacturer to arrive at the cited statistics.
Premise : the employees of Manufacturer R had more job-related accidents last month than did the employees of Manufacturer S

If the count was wrong - conclusion is jeopardized.

Kudos [?]: 930 [0], given: 36

Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 222

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 20

Re: Job-related injuries [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2010, 11:04
If the counting technique of S casts a wider net for accidents to be considered job related and yet the number was lower than the job related accidents at R, then that fact according to me would strengthen the claim that S is less likely to have accidents than R. How can B be correct merely because it involves a counting technique?

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 20

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 953

Kudos [?]: 930 [0], given: 36

Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
Re: Job-related injuries [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2010, 11:44
Yes that's a brilliant doubt. But if the data is garbled or overstated then any conclusion on that data is garbled, basically nothing can be inferred from the premise. And conclusion falls.

Kudos [?]: 930 [0], given: 36

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 295

Kudos [?]: 247 [0], given: 194

Schools: Chicago Booth Class of 2013
Re: Job-related injuries [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2010, 05:06
nusmavrik wrote:
Yes that's a brilliant doubt. But if the data is garbled or overstated then any conclusion on that data is garbled, basically nothing can be inferred from the premise. And conclusion falls.

Men,

There is a misprint in B, shold be:
Manufacturer R considered more types of accidents to be job-related than did Manufacturer S.

Kudos [?]: 247 [0], given: 194

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 298

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 7

Re: Job-related injuries [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2010, 05:07
With Financier's correction I d go with B otherwise I have my doubts!!

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 7

Manager
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 111

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 10

Location: india
Re: Job-related injuries [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2010, 23:55
B

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 10

Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 167

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 33

WE 1: 3 (Mining Operations)
Re: Job-related injuries [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2010, 00:05
Only with final correction, I will go for B too
_________________

Regards,
Invincible...
"The way to succeed is to double your error rate."
"Most people who succeed in the face of seemingly impossible conditions are people who simply don't know how to quit."

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 33

Intern
Joined: 16 Aug 2010
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Re: Job-related injuries [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2010, 00:24
Answer Choice B only if it were -

'Manufacturer R considered more types of accidents to be job-related than did Manufacturer S'
_________________

Consider awarding Kudos if my post helps !!

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Re: Job-related injuries   [#permalink] 18 Aug 2010, 00:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.