It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 06:12

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Which of the following most logically completes the

Author Message
VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1207

Kudos [?]: 821 [0], given: 0

Location: Taiwan
Which of the following most logically completes the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2005, 04:06
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:34) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

A. many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from foodâ€™s having a longer shelf life

B. it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has

C. cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods

D. certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is

E. for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded

Kudos [?]: 821 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2005, 04:29
C sets apart the cooking and irradiation as 2 different stages; it is explains why the comparison is misleading.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2231

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2005, 23:36
Hmmm I tend to agree with E. It says that the fact is either beside the point (for foods taht are not cooked) or misleading (for foods that are cooked).

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 847

Kudos [?]: 251 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2005, 00:34
I tend to go for (C) earlier but after I read HongHus's post, I will go for (E). I agree that (C) does point out those two are seperated processes but it does not tell why the fact is "misleading." (E) is better by saying that "the fact" is "beside the point" in two cases (either or - statement):
(1) uncooked foods
(2) cooked foods

Kudos [?]: 251 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 63

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: NYC

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2005, 12:51
I actually thought itâ€™s A.
It is misleading because whoever is arguing for the irradiation of food gains benefits in it.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2231

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2005, 16:13
Misleading means making people think otherwise. I do not think that by saying radiation kills same amount of nutricient as cooking would lead people to think that its proponent do not benefit from it.

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1207

Kudos [?]: 821 [0], given: 0

Location: Taiwan

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2005, 08:18
time is out.

The OA is E. well done, guys.

Kudos [?]: 821 [0], given: 0

08 Feb 2005, 08:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by