It is currently 21 Sep 2017, 09:13

# Happening Now:

Live Chat with Amy Mitson, Sr. Associate Director of Admissions at Tuck Dartmouth

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# While most ecologists believe that the Striped Kangaroo of

Author Message
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 584

Kudos [?]: 788 [0], given: 20

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
While most ecologists believe that the Striped Kangaroo of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2010, 16:49
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

87% (00:51) correct 13% (00:33) wrong based on 15 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

While most ecologists believe that the Striped Kangaroo of southern Australia should be added to the Endangered Species List, the World Conservation Union has stated that the kangaroo will be listed only if it could be proved to be a distinctly different species from other kangaroos.

A. only if it could be proved to be a distinctly different species
B. only if it is proved to be a different species, distinct
C. if it can only be proved to be a species distinctly different
D. if it was proved to be only a distinct and different species
E. if it could be only proved to be a different species, distinctly

I chose A, but got it wrong; specifically, what is wrong with A?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

Kudos [?]: 788 [0], given: 20

VP
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1469

Kudos [?]: 295 [0], given: 31

Re: While most ecologists believe [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2010, 17:56
gmatbull wrote:
While most ecologists believe that the Striped Kangaroo of southern Australia should be added to the Endangered Species List, the World Conservation Union has stated that the kangaroo will be listed only if it could be proved to be a distinctly different species from other kangaroos.

A. only if it could be proved to be a distinctly different species
B. only if it is proved to be a different species, distinct
C. if it can only be proved to be a species distinctly different
D. if it was proved to be only a distinct and different species
E. if it could be only proved to be a different species, distinctly

I chose A, but got it wrong; specifically, what is wrong with A?

Take out the pronoun "it" and replace it with "kangaroo"

a. only if the kangaroo could be proved
b. only if the kangaroo is proved to be a different species

In A, we don't want to prove the kangaroo

Kudos [?]: 295 [0], given: 31

Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 190

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 29

Re: While most ecologists believe [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2010, 21:38
i would like to add here that the other 3 anwser choices C/D/E are not right since "only" has to follow right in the beginning... substituting kangaroo helps too....

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 29

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 584

Kudos [?]: 788 [0], given: 20

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Re: While most ecologists believe [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2010, 07:26
Yes, agreed; C-E are out, for same reason mentioned by Pransasvij.

My contention centers on choices A & B. I'll now try to explain the basis
of elimination (or choice) of either of them.
A: only if it could be proved to be a distinctly different species
(i) passive -less preferred (if it -kangaroo- COULD BE PROVED...)

Is my second reasoning correct:
(ii) underlined part not correctly connecting to the non-underlined part; thus,
making a wrong comparison:
"a distinctly different species from other kangaroos" should be:
"a distinctly different species from that of other kangaroos"

B: "only if it is proved to be a different species, distinct"
(i) preferred- active (if it -kangaroo- IS PROVED...)
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

Kudos [?]: 788 [0], given: 20

Intern
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore
Re: While most ecologists believe [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2010, 10:10
Hi,

I see it like this..

A. only if it could be proved to be a distinctly different species
There is already a condition for proof "only if" present in the sentence so "could be " is redundant.

B. only if it is proved to be a different species, distinct
Redundancy is eliminated here..
_________________

Nothing is free.. You 've to earn it!!!

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 273

Kudos [?]: 237 [0], given: 2

Re: While most ecologists believe [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2010, 14:52
B.

Also 'could' can't be used with if.
_________________

Trying hard to achieve something unachievable now....

Kudos [?]: 237 [0], given: 2

Re: While most ecologists believe   [#permalink] 05 Sep 2010, 14:52
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Scientists believe that unlike the males of most species of 2 06 Feb 2009, 13:57
Scientists believe that unlike the males of most species of 0 02 Jul 2016, 11:39
While most graduate students find that 0 09 Jul 2017, 12:39
1) While some academicians believe that business ethics 0 09 Dec 2013, 20:19
While some academicians believe that business ethics should 6 30 Nov 2008, 19:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by