While royal governor of New Jersey, William Franklin’s conviction that the colonies should remain part of England was
not unlike that of his father Benjamin Franklin, who initially preferred a continued association with England, though he eventually played a role in forging America's independence, helping craft the Declaration of Independence after a change of heart
Firstly, will reduce the sentence to as short as we can by preserving the meaning.
While royal governor of New Jersey, William Franklin’s conviction
that the colonies should remain part of England was not unlike that of his father Benjamin Franklin,
who initially preferred a continued association with England, though he eventually played a role in forging America's independence, helping craft the Declaration of Independence after a change of heartThe statement has become very short and still preserves the intended meaning. All the striked off part in the above sentence is either redundant or modifying someone in the non-striked off part of the sentence.
William Franklin’s conviction was not unlike that of his father Benjamin Franklin. -- This sentence is perfectly fine and I don't see any error in this sentence. Let's evaluate the answer choices.
Quote:
A. not unlike that of his father Benjamin Franklin, who initially preferred
Only correct choice, preserving the intended meaning.
CORRECTQuote:
B. not unlike his father Benjamin Franklin, who initially preferred
comparison error. William Franklin’s conviction is being compared with his father Benjamin Franklin. Irrelevant.
ELIMINATEDQuote:
C. like his father Benjamin Franklin, and his initial preference
comparison error. William Franklin’s conviction is being compared with his father Benjamin Franklin. Irrelevant.
ELIMINATEDQuote:
D. like that of his father Benjamin Franklin, for preferring
Modifier error. The last part of the sentence is just modifying Benjamin Franklin but is not adding any value to the intended meaning of the sentence. But in this choice by using "for preferring" makes this essential information. This is not the intended meaning.
ELIMINATEDQuote:
E. as that of his father Benjamin Franklin, who initially preferred
In this choice, we can replace "that" with "conviction". Let's replace and see if the meaning of the sentence is conveyed or not.
William Franklin’s conviction was as conviction of his father Benjamin Franklin.
Is this statement really making sense? I don't think so. As is used to compared two actions or ideologies but that is not the case her. So
ELIMINATED.
OPTION:
A