Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 26 May 2017, 17:24

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Status: Do and Die!!
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Posts: 326
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 506 [1] , given: 193

Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2011, 12:08
1
KUDOS
18
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

67% (01:42) correct 33% (00:55) wrong based on 1008 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

[Reveal] Spoiler:
isn't Ban fallowed by prohibiting is redundant ?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

I'm the Dumbest of All !!

If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Status: Enjoying the MBA journey :)
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
Posts: 137
Location: United States (DC)
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Corporate Finance (Other)
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 122 [3] , given: 16

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2011, 12:44
3
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Here's the explanation:

ban and prohibit mean the same thing, but in this context, their usage is different and hence they complement each other.
Here, the sentence is actually trying to say that Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida and Minnesota do not accept leaves, brush and grass clippings in their landfills.

Option A uses an incorrect idiom. The correct idiom is 'prohibit ... from' and not 'prohibit ... to'. Hence incorrect.

Option B suffers from a similar error. 'Prohibiting that' is incorrect usage.

Options C is the clearest answer choice here. It correctly uses the idiom 'prohibiting ... from'. Hence this is the correct answer.

Options D and E are both incorrect because they do not have a clear meaning due to the usage of 'bans that'.

Hope this helps!
_________________

MBA Candidate 2015 | Georgetown University
McDonough School of Business

Senior Manager
Status: Do and Die!!
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Posts: 326
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 506 [0], given: 193

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2011, 13:29
Thanks !!

i x out the first three, ....SCCCCCCC
_________________

I'm the Dumbest of All !!

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2011
Posts: 363
Location: US
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 46

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2011, 14:33
sudish wrote:
Here's the explanation:

ban and prohibit mean the same thing, but in this context, their usage is different and hence they complement each other.
Here, the sentence is actually trying to say that Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida and Minnesota do not accept leaves, brush and grass clippings in their landfills.

Option A uses an incorrect idiom. The correct idiom is 'prohibit ... from' and not 'prohibit ... to'. Hence incorrect.

Option B suffers from a similar error. 'Prohibiting that' is incorrect usage.

Options C is the clearest answer choice here. It correctly uses the idiom 'prohibiting ... from'. Hence this is the correct answer.

Options D and E are both incorrect because they do not have a clear meaning due to the usage of 'bans that'.

Hope this helps!

@sudish - why usage of 'bans that' is incorrect? Can you illustrate?
Cheers!
_________________

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What you do TODAY is important because you're exchanging a day of your life for it!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Manager
Status: Enjoying the MBA journey :)
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
Posts: 137
Location: United States (DC)
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Corporate Finance (Other)
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 122 [5] , given: 16

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2011, 00:17
5
KUDOS
@Capricorn369:

Let's look at the first part of the sentence:
'Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans'
This part can stand on its own and hence it's an independent clause.

The next part of the sentence in options D and E are:
'leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills' and
'landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings'
Both these sentences are independent clauses as well and as such, can stand on their own.
The first part of the sentence does not require the second part to complete its meaning. Hence, the second part is non-essential and is therefore a non-restrictive clause.

Now, we know that we use 'that' only when the clause is restrictive. If the clause is non-restrictive, we use 'which' so that the clause acts as subordinate to the main clause.

Had the options D and E been of the form:
'prohibit landfills from accepting leaves, brush and grass clippings.'
they would have been correct because the latter part would have then acted as a restrictive clause required to complete the meaning of the main clause and could have been aptly joined to the main clause using 'that'.

Hope this is clear now!
_________________

MBA Candidate 2015 | Georgetown University
McDonough School of Business

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 886
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 74

Kudos [?]: 657 [2] , given: 44

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2011, 05:45
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
shrive555 wrote:
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) Same
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

isn't Ban fallowed by prohibiting is redundant ?

Nope, it is not redundant, " prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings" is the adjective phrase that help the meaning of "statewide bans" is clearer. The right idiom is "prohibit X from Y". Other choices seem awkward and wrong idiom. Choice D and E do not have clear meaning when use form "bans that"
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 2005
Concentration: Finance
Followers: 68

Kudos [?]: 643 [1] , given: 355

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2013, 13:58
1
KUDOS
shrive555 wrote:
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) Same
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

isn't Ban fallowed by prohibiting is redundant ?

Also, recall this example
The law PROHIBITS any citizen FROM VOTING twice (The law PROHIBITS any citizen TO VOTE twice/PROHIBITS THAT any person VOTE twice are both wrong)

According to my notes

Cheers!
J

Kudos rain!
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 896
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Followers: 24

Kudos [?]: 768 [0], given: 322

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2014, 09:03
Experts,

Can anyone explain the reasoning behind the OE from VR2 why (D) and (E) are wrong?

(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills

OE:Bans that . . . cannot be accepted is not a correct idiom and does not make sense.

(E). that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

OE:Bans that . . . cannot accept is an incorrect idiom, and cannot following bans is illogical.

Can someone come up with the idioms starting with BANS?

Why cannot following BANS is illogical?

Rgds,
TGC!
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2510
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '19 (D)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 169

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Apr 2015, 11:02
isn't ban prohibiting redundant? ban = prohibit
no?
Intern
Joined: 26 Feb 2015
Posts: 27
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q46 V19
GMAT 2: 630 Q49 V27
GMAT 3: 680 Q49 V33
GPA: 2.92
WE: Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 66

Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2016, 07:51
is subjunctive mood ok here?
I thought about subjunctive mood structure, so I choose B
Math Forum Moderator
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 2678
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 111

Kudos [?]: 860 [0], given: 324

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2016, 11:27
shrive555 wrote:
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

[Reveal] Spoiler:
isn't Ban fallowed by prohibiting is redundant ?

Correct idiomatic usage of Prohibit is -

Prohibit X from Y

Only (C) uses it correctly , hence correct answer will definitely be (C)
_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to   [#permalink] 25 Apr 2016, 11:27
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 In the admissions process, universities have begun 3 06 Aug 2015, 23:34
5 Financial institutions have begun demanding that analysts 2 11 May 2014, 18:02
3 The ophthalmologists' offices have begun selling 12 25 May 2017, 01:01
5 Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to 13 16 Sep 2016, 12:55
27 Financial institutions have begun demanding that analysts 10 16 Oct 2016, 10:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.