It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 00:52

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Status: want to get 720+in GMAT
Joined: 13 Mar 2011
Posts: 50

Kudos [?]: 41 [2], given: 0

Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2011, 00:26
2
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

66% (00:41) correct 34% (00:53) wrong based on 1243 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Aim 720+

Kudos [?]: 41 [2], given: 0

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4288

Kudos [?]: 7875 [3], given: 363

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2011, 01:29
3
KUDOS
The template of the idiom is ‘prohibit x from doing y’; Choice c is correct- ‘prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings’
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7875 [3], given: 363

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4288

Kudos [?]: 7875 [0], given: 363

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2011, 01:50
Because A is not ‘prohibit from’ but ‘prohibit to’
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7875 [0], given: 363

Manager
Joined: 09 Aug 2010
Posts: 106

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 7

Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2011, 06:28
ravi67741 wrote:
Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.
(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

This is an example that tests correct idiomatic expressions.

Rule:
RIGHT: PROHIBITS X FROM Y
WRONG: PROHIBITS THAT
WRONG: PROHIBITS X TO Y

Using this rule, we can quickly eliminate A, B.
D & E can be eliminated because C is better and crisp. It has the correct idiomatic expression that the author is trying to use in his sentence structure.

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 7

Manager
Status: It's "Go" Time.......
Affiliations: N.C.C.
Joined: 22 Feb 2011
Posts: 180

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 2

Location: India
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2011, 07:53
Easy one got it within 30 seconds..

The correct idiom is "prohibit x from Y"
Only "C" uses the right idiom thus it is a correct choice...

ravi67741 wrote:
Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.
(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

_________________

We are twice armed if we fight with faith.

He who knows when he can fight & when He can't will be victorious.

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 272

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 13

Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2011, 00:48
yes, it is prohibit from, ban on and forbid to..

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 13

Manager
Status: want to get 720+in GMAT
Joined: 13 Mar 2011
Posts: 50

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2011, 23:16
MSDHONI wrote:
Easy one got it within 30 seconds..

The correct idiom is "prohibit x from Y"
Only "C" uses the right idiom thus it is a correct choice...

ravi67741 wrote:
Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.
(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

thanx dhoni....n hws ur prep goin on
_________________

Aim 720+

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Status: Do and Die!!
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Posts: 313

Kudos [?]: 592 [1], given: 193

Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2011, 12:08
1
KUDOS
18
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

[Reveal] Spoiler:
isn't Ban fallowed by prohibiting is redundant ?

_________________

I'm the Dumbest of All !!

Kudos [?]: 592 [1], given: 193

Manager
Status: Enjoying the MBA journey :)
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
Posts: 137

Kudos [?]: 135 [3], given: 16

Location: United States (DC)
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Corporate Finance (Other)
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2011, 12:44
3
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Here's the explanation:

ban and prohibit mean the same thing, but in this context, their usage is different and hence they complement each other.
Here, the sentence is actually trying to say that Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida and Minnesota do not accept leaves, brush and grass clippings in their landfills.

Option A uses an incorrect idiom. The correct idiom is 'prohibit ... from' and not 'prohibit ... to'. Hence incorrect.

Option B suffers from a similar error. 'Prohibiting that' is incorrect usage.

Options C is the clearest answer choice here. It correctly uses the idiom 'prohibiting ... from'. Hence this is the correct answer.

Options D and E are both incorrect because they do not have a clear meaning due to the usage of 'bans that'.

Hope this helps!
_________________

MBA Candidate 2015 | Georgetown University

Kudos [?]: 135 [3], given: 16

Senior Manager
Status: Do and Die!!
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Posts: 313

Kudos [?]: 592 [0], given: 193

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2011, 13:29
Thanks !!

i x out the first three, ....SCCCCCCC
_________________

I'm the Dumbest of All !!

Kudos [?]: 592 [0], given: 193

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2011
Posts: 355

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 46

Location: US
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2011, 14:33
sudish wrote:
Here's the explanation:

ban and prohibit mean the same thing, but in this context, their usage is different and hence they complement each other.
Here, the sentence is actually trying to say that Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida and Minnesota do not accept leaves, brush and grass clippings in their landfills.

Option A uses an incorrect idiom. The correct idiom is 'prohibit ... from' and not 'prohibit ... to'. Hence incorrect.

Option B suffers from a similar error. 'Prohibiting that' is incorrect usage.

Options C is the clearest answer choice here. It correctly uses the idiom 'prohibiting ... from'. Hence this is the correct answer.

Options D and E are both incorrect because they do not have a clear meaning due to the usage of 'bans that'.

Hope this helps!

@sudish - why usage of 'bans that' is incorrect? Can you illustrate?
Cheers!
_________________

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What you do TODAY is important because you're exchanging a day of your life for it!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 46

Manager
Status: Enjoying the MBA journey :)
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
Posts: 137

Kudos [?]: 135 [5], given: 16

Location: United States (DC)
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Corporate Finance (Other)
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2011, 00:17
5
KUDOS
@Capricorn369:

Let's look at the first part of the sentence:
'Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans'
This part can stand on its own and hence it's an independent clause.

The next part of the sentence in options D and E are:
'leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills' and
'landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings'
Both these sentences are independent clauses as well and as such, can stand on their own.
The first part of the sentence does not require the second part to complete its meaning. Hence, the second part is non-essential and is therefore a non-restrictive clause.

Now, we know that we use 'that' only when the clause is restrictive. If the clause is non-restrictive, we use 'which' so that the clause acts as subordinate to the main clause.

Had the options D and E been of the form:
'prohibit landfills from accepting leaves, brush and grass clippings.'
they would have been correct because the latter part would have then acted as a restrictive clause required to complete the meaning of the main clause and could have been aptly joined to the main clause using 'that'.

Hope this is clear now!
_________________

MBA Candidate 2015 | Georgetown University

Kudos [?]: 135 [5], given: 16

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 888

Kudos [?]: 718 [2], given: 44

Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2011, 05:45
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
shrive555 wrote:
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) Same
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

isn't Ban fallowed by prohibiting is redundant ?

Nope, it is not redundant, " prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings" is the adjective phrase that help the meaning of "statewide bans" is clearer. The right idiom is "prohibit X from Y". Other choices seem awkward and wrong idiom. Choice D and E do not have clear meaning when use form "bans that"
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Kudos [?]: 718 [2], given: 44

Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2011
Posts: 80

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Dec 2011, 05:18
Prohibit from is correct idiom.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 565

Kudos [?]: 694 [0], given: 80

Location: India
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2013, 10:43
Bumping for review and further discussion*.

*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE

_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Kudos [?]: 694 [0], given: 80

Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1980

Kudos [?]: 719 [1], given: 355

Concentration: Finance
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2013, 13:58
1
KUDOS
shrive555 wrote:
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) Same
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

isn't Ban fallowed by prohibiting is redundant ?

Also, recall this example
The law PROHIBITS any citizen FROM VOTING twice (The law PROHIBITS any citizen TO VOTE twice/PROHIBITS THAT any person VOTE twice are both wrong)

According to my notes

Cheers!
J

Kudos rain!

Kudos [?]: 719 [1], given: 355

Manager
Joined: 18 Oct 2013
Posts: 83

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 36

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Finance
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V21
GMAT 2: 530 Q49 V13
GMAT 3: 590 Q49 V21
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2013, 11:02
Prohibiting X from Y : correct idiom

+1 to me..

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 36

Intern
Joined: 21 Feb 2013
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2013, 21:50
When the sentence uses ban, doesn't the use of the word prohibit make it redundant?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 959

Kudos [?]: 1845 [0], given: 229

Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2013, 08:30
Meaning wise is it right to say "prohibiting landfills to accept" how come landfills can accept anything landfill is not a person or organisation.. usually we prohibit someone who obeys ... landfills can not obey orders.
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Kudos [?]: 1845 [0], given: 229

Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 899

Kudos [?]: 885 [0], given: 322

Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2014, 09:03
Experts,

Can anyone explain the reasoning behind the OE from VR2 why (D) and (E) are wrong?

(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills

OE:Bans that . . . cannot be accepted is not a correct idiom and does not make sense.

(E). that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

OE:Bans that . . . cannot accept is an incorrect idiom, and cannot following bans is illogical.

Can someone come up with the idioms starting with BANS?

Why cannot following BANS is illogical?

Rgds,
TGC!
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Kudos [?]: 885 [0], given: 322

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to   [#permalink] 05 Apr 2014, 09:03

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 29 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by