Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 17:35 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 17:35

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Apr 2008
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 328 [36]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42103 [7]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 167
Own Kudos [?]: 863 [5]
Given Kudos: 7
Schools:MBA, Thunderbird School of Global Management / BA, Wesleyan University
Send PM
General Discussion
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42103 [0]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding fe [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Quote:
BKimball wrote

With that said, I'd push people to not just consider the single word used in this and other questions (less vs. lesser) but the phrase overall ("of less than" vs. "lesser than) and try to determine why one of these is right and the other is wrong.


Can you please tell us which is correct? Of less than Choice A or lesser than (Choice C).

Coming back to your example of the word ‘like’, the use of the same word in two different meanings is not equal to the use of two different words in the same meaning, which is what the text is about. Can you please give some more examples in which we have to choose between two altogether different words but with the same meaning such as equal and equalant etc.

I also feel that it is not fair to compare a word in spoken form with its written form.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42103 [2]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding fe [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
With due respects to Bkimball's views, which he is entitled for, just as I am for my own views which I cherish, let me make out a few things. I think that this forum is neither for teaching nor for exploring English grammar. This is for teaching enough grammar to cross over the GMAT. Within that pressure cooker time of the real-time GMAT, the test taker must know the shortest but the safest means ticking the right ones. Knowledge of grammar is subservient to this purpose.

But let me reiterate that I respect other views too.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 80
Own Kudos [?]: 296 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Location: So. CA
Concentration: General
WE 1: 2 IT
WE 2: 4 Software Analyst
Send PM
Re: With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding fe [#permalink]
1
Kudos
here is a really good write up on this topic --
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/pos ... tml#p26913
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 167
Own Kudos [?]: 863 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Schools:MBA, Thunderbird School of Global Management / BA, Wesleyan University
Send PM
Re: With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding fe [#permalink]
daagh,

I completely understand what you're saying and didn't intend for this to be a purely theoretical discussion of grammar. That said, I have spent a lot of time taking, teaching, and reviewing the GMAT and I believe that you need to understand certain fundamental grammatical concepts to do well on SC. Although there are rules that get shared on many forums ("Being is always wrong" / "The shortest answer is always right" / etc.) the reality is that the only real hard and fast rule on SC is that "The right answer must be grammatically correct." Although students can probably increase their scores to a certain point using shortcuts, most of the comments I see on this forum are from students who say their goal scores are 650-750. For better or for worse, that's why I often post about the grammar behind SC questions.

Brett
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Jun 2015
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 177 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding fe [#permalink]
dominicraj wrote:
With a total population of less than five thousand and fewer well-trained soldiers than ever before, the army base is still unprepared for a real war.

(A) less than five thousand and fewer

(B) lower than five thousand and less

(C) lesser than five thousand and fewer

(D) fewer than five thousand and less

(E) fewer than five thousand and of fewer



Hi dominicraj

Do you have any specific doubt in the question? Also, sharing your thought process will help others to understand and respond to your doubt better. :)


Happy prepping!

Dolly Sharma

Originally posted by DollySharma on 15 Jun 2015, 03:32.
Last edited by DollySharma on 13 Nov 2015, 01:08, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 289
Own Kudos [?]: 715 [0]
Given Kudos: 39
Send PM
Re: With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding fe [#permalink]
Prepcorn wrote:
dominicraj wrote:
With a total population of less than five thousand and fewer well-trained soldiers than ever before, the army base is still unprepared for a real war.

(A) less than five thousand and fewer

(B) lower than five thousand and less

(C) lesser than five thousand and fewer

(D) fewer than five thousand and less

(E) fewer than five thousand and of fewer



Hi dominicraj

Do you have any specific doubt in the question? Also, sharing your thought process will help others to understand and respond to your doubt better. :)


Happy prepping!

Dolly Sharma
Prepcorn


Hi Dolly,

When an uncountable noun decreases we use "less" and when the noun is countable we use "fewer". Specifically when the number is also given its definitely a countable. And well-trained soldiers can be any number in the population hence it can be taken as uncountable.

However as per the OA "less" is used for the decrease in the number. I am not sure of how this works.

Regards,
Dom.
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Posts: 6072
Own Kudos [?]: 4689 [3]
Given Kudos: 463
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding fe [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
dominicraj wrote:
With a total population of less than five thousand and fewer well-trained soldiers than ever before, the army base is still unprepared for a real war.


(A) less than five thousand and fewer - Correct

Population is countable so less can be used here. { Remember the Census Survey ??? }
Fewer is uncountable , used correctly for well trained soldiers.

Can trained soldiers be counted ? How can you measure how much training is sufficient to qualify as a trained soldier ?

(B) lower than five thousand and less - Incorrect

Lower refers to lesser in position...

(C) lesserthan five thousand and fewer - Incorrect

" Lesser " than is used for comparative nouns , which is incorrect.

(D) fewer than five thousand and less - Incorrect

" Fewer than " is used for comparative nouns , which is incorrect.

(E)fewer than five thousand and of fewer - Incorrect

" Fewer than " is used for comparative nouns , which is incorrect.

Hence (A) is correct..




PS : How to remember Less than Vs Fewer Than ? :P

Just remember X less than Y = Y - X { Used in mathematics - Countable things }
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Jun 2015
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 177 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding fe [#permalink]
2
Bookmarks
Quote:
Hi Dolly,

When an uncountable noun decreases we use "less" and when the noun is countable we use "fewer". Specifically when the number is also given its definitely a countable. And well-trained soldiers can be any number in the population hence it can be taken as uncountable.

However as per the OA "less" is used for the decrease in the number. I am not sure of how this works.

Regards,
Dom.


You are right that "When an uncountable noun decreases we use "less" and when the noun is countable we use "fewer". "

Here are some examples:

Countable: fewer cars/ dollars/ bottles
Uncountable: less traffic/ amount of money/ water

Note: In all these cases fewer/ less are adjectives (placed next to the noun without "than").

Let's take an example:

I bought less pens than my friend did . - incorrect
I bought fewer pens than my friend did. correct

Just as "pens", "soldiers" is a countable noun (1 soldier, 2 soldiers...) and thus, "fewer" is used correctly for "soldiers".

As for the first part, "With a total population of less than five thousand "...

while using numbers/ units such as thousand, feet, kilometers, and miles for continuous quantity, we use uncountable construction with "than".

For example:
The distance was less than 10 kilometers
Population of less than five thousand

Hope it helps!


Happy Prepping!

Dolly Sharma

Originally posted by DollySharma on 15 Jun 2015, 13:16.
Last edited by DollySharma on 16 Jun 2015, 03:04, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jan 2015
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 62
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
Send PM
Re: With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding fe [#permalink]
Bkimball

I couldn't understand the usage of "less" here. I frequently commit this mistake.....

Any thumb rule. Also I have clear idea of countable and un-countable nouns.
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [3]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding fe [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
ankitmining wrote:
Bkimball

I couldn't understand the usage of "less" here. I frequently commit this mistake.....

Any thumb rule. Also I have clear idea of countable and un-countable nouns.


When comparing numbers, "less" is used (the number itself is uncountable). "Population" (unlike "person / people") is a number and hence uncountable. One can count people, but not population - it is meaningless to say 1 population, 2 populations etc. On the other hand, people/ person is countable - it alright to say 1 person, 2 persons/people, 3 people etc.
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Posts: 6072
Own Kudos [?]: 4689 [0]
Given Kudos: 463
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding fe [#permalink]
Sasindran wrote:
With a total population of less than five thousand and fewer well-trained soldiers than ever before, the army base is still unprepared for a real war.
(A) less than five thousand and fewer
(B) lower than five thousand and less
(C) lesser than five thousand and fewer
(D) fewer than five thousand and less
(E) fewer than five thousand and of fewer


fewer = countable things
less = compares non-countable amounts/singular mass nouns


Correct Answer must be (A) for the highlighted errors...
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Nov 2018
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding fe [#permalink]
With a total population of less than 200; and fewer females than ever before

First of all it is critical to understand that they are two different parts of a sentence.
Total population has been described as less than 200. Fewer than 200 would be wrong.
In the second part - the number of females is fewer than ever before. Since this is a comparison the usage of fewer is correct. Less would be wrong

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2017
Posts: 43
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 277
Location: India
Schools: HBS '22
Send PM
Re: With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding fe [#permalink]
Not able to understand why we are choosing "less" when we can count the number of crocodiles and "fewer" when we can't count the number of breeding females.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17206
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding fe [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding fe [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne