With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 26 Feb 2017, 18:48

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Forum Moderator
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1426
GPA: 3.77
Followers: 180

Kudos [?]: 860 [9] , given: 621

With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2010, 00:29
9
KUDOS
25
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (01:56) correct 46% (01:30) wrong based on 1363 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000.

A. With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have

B. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that donot allow hunting, wildlife officails' estimate of deer population in New Jersey has

C. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the Deer Population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has

D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have

E. Without natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighbourhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

If you have any questions
New!
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3703
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 735

Kudos [?]: 5752 [9] , given: 322

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2010, 02:25
9
KUDOS
Choice C becos, it is the only one in which, the modifier phrase introducing the
passage genuinely modifies the intended modified noun the deer population
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 269
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 83 [1] , given: 9

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2010, 04:38
1
KUDOS
The starting modifier should modify deer population and not wildlife officials. So I am down with C and D.

I selected D as I felt two characteristics are desribed for 'in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods" - no predators and no hunting area.
_________________

If you like my post, consider giving me some KUDOS !!!!! Like you I need them

Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 193
Location: Finland
Schools: Admitted: IESE($$),HEC, RSM,Esade WE 1: 3.5 years international Followers: 6 Kudos [?]: 93 [7] , given: 18 Re: deer population [#permalink] ### Show Tags 18 Oct 2010, 04:56 7 This post received KUDOS 4 This post was BOOKMARKED Pkit wrote: With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000. A. With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have B. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that donot allow hunting, wildlife officails' estimate of deer population in New Jersey has C. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the Deer Population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have E. Without natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighbourhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has I go for C. This problem is a very good example of ellipsis, as explained by Kaplan. Firstly, the negation is used wrongly. It should be "....no and no..." or "...no or ....". In this sentence the negation is applied to natural predators and to expanses of green suburban neighbourhoods, which is not the intended meaning. Secondly, parallelism calls for the use of "with" on both sides of the parallel marker. Thirdly, "deer population" is a singular subject and requires a singular verb such as "has". Lastly, the plural possessive noun (s') is almost always wrong on the GMAT. Manager Joined: 24 Aug 2010 Posts: 193 Location: Finland Schools: Admitted: IESE($$),HEC, RSM,Esade
WE 1: 3.5 years international
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 93 [1] , given: 18

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2010, 05:09
1
KUDOS
Pkit wrote:
saxenashobhit wrote:
The starting modifier should modify deer population and not wildlife officials. So I am down with C and D.

I selected D as I felt two characteristics are desribed for 'in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods" - no predators and no hunting area.

I also was mislead by D.

One more reason why D is wrong because of parallelism. In D, the phrase "without" is applied to the whole main clause which goes against the meaning of the sentence. You have to use the word "with" in the second part before "no hunting..." in order to preserve the original meaning.
Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 151
WE 1: 4 years in IT
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 249 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2010, 03:09
D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have

Modifier error in D ...Natural predators modifies new jersey wrongly...

C is best among.
SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1628
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 1090 [1] , given: 2

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2011, 02:43
1
KUDOS
how can expanses of green suburban neighborhoods modify the deer population in C?
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Intern
Status: I will it!!!
Affiliations: Certified Credit Card Banking Professional
Joined: 19 Jul 2010
Posts: 37
Schools: Chicago Booth, ISB
WE 1: 6 years in IT BFSI Cards application
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 11

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2011, 07:55
I am not at all convinced as to how "With no natural predators....there is no hunting" --> modifies Deer Population ??
I was expecting the ans to be " D " because , the statement "With no natural predators...." modifies the place , which is New Jersey .

If you guys say that population is singular , hence "Have" in option D is wrong , then I did read somewhere that population can be singular OR plural depending on whether the population is being considered collectively or as individuals.

I am not 100% sure about what I am saying , but would request some more convincing answers as to why C is right ?

----------
C. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the Deer Population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has

D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have
----------
_________________

[align=]- Abhishek [/align]

Director
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 898
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 1088 [0], given: 543

Re: With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jun 2013, 01:01
Can someone provide a detailed explanation for this one? Thanks in advance!
_________________

Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...

Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/

GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html

VP
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1123
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 184

Kudos [?]: 1999 [6] , given: 219

Re: With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jun 2013, 01:13
6
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
fozzzy wrote:
Can someone provide a detailed explanation for this one? Thanks in advance!

We can solve this in under 10 seconds if we look at the inital phrase. In every option except C there are refering errors

A. With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have
B. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that donot allow hunting, wildlife officails' estimate of deer population in New Jersey has
C. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the Deer Population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has
D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have
E. Without natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighbourhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has

I do not care about how the first part is written ("Without VS With no" etc...), about the grammar, but I know that this part refers to the deer population. Only C has this correct counstruct.
Take E for instance, it says that wildlife officials have no natural predators and so on... this is logically incorrect
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Intern
Joined: 27 Apr 2013
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 9

Re: With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jun 2013, 06:57
I too selected D.I checked the explanation later.
But it somehow appeared the clause should modify the place and not deer population.

Thanks all for explaining.
Princeton Review Representative
Joined: 17 Jun 2013
Posts: 163
Followers: 140

Kudos [?]: 307 [2] , given: 0

Re: With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jun 2013, 08:56
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
PTK wrote:
With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000.

A. With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have
B. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that donot allow hunting, wildlife officails' estimate of deer population in new Jersey has
C. With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the Deer Population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has
D. Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have
E. Without natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighbourhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has

There is a subject verb agreement issue at the end of the sentence. the population is singular so we need has - this eliminates A and D. B, C and D all have the same type of modifier so the way the begining is worded is not at issue adn teh different between without and with no is an issue of style, not grammar. B says that the officials estimate as grown, not the deer population so it changes the meaning and is wrong. In E the begining phrase modifies wildlife officials, not the deer population so E is wrong and C is hte best answer.
_________________

Special offer! Save $250 on GMAT Ultimate Classroom, GMAT Small Group Instruction, or GMAT Liveonline when you use the promo code GCVERBAL250. Or, save$150 on GMAT Self-Prep when you use the code GCVERBAL150. Enroll at www.princetonreview.com

Intern
Joined: 14 Jan 2013
Posts: 25
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 43

Re: With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2013, 09:40
Hi,

Can you please answer my query : in choice "C" what is "wildlife officials estimate" functioning as? Modifier? Modifying what? What kind of modifier?

Thanks,
Kiran
Manager
Joined: 25 Mar 2013
Posts: 59
WE: Project Management (Telecommunications)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 52

Re: With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2013, 21:33
kiranck007 wrote:
Hi,

Can you please answer my query : in choice "C" what is "wildlife officials estimate" functioning as? Modifier? Modifying what? What kind of modifier?

Thanks,
Kiran

Good question.
I discarded choice C because of this ", wildlife officials estimate,", but now it looks it was correct. But I do not understand why
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1153
Location: United States
Followers: 263

Kudos [?]: 2917 [3] , given: 123

Re: With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2013, 23:09
3
KUDOS
happyinlove505 wrote:
kiranck007 wrote:
Hi,

Can you please answer my query : in choice "C" what is "wildlife officials estimate" functioning as? Modifier? Modifying what? What kind of modifier?

Thanks,
Kiran

Good question.
I discarded choice C because of this ", wildlife officials estimate,", but now it looks it was correct. But I do not understand why

Hi happyinlove505

"wildlife officials estimate" is clause modifier (because it has both subject and verb).

Note: Modifiers are words, phrases, or clauses that provide description in sentences.

In this question, the clause "wildlife officials estimate" plays as noun modifier. The clause modifies "the deer population". To make sure let ask what wildlife official estimate? Absolutely, they estimate the deer population.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Status: Time to apply!
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 220
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 166

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2013, 22:00
noboru wrote:
how can expanses of green suburban neighborhoods modify the deer population in C?

Anyone to give a clear answer to this question?
Thanks!
_________________

Didn't give up !!! Still Trying!!

Manager
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 86
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2013, 22:35
The answer to this question is definitely not clear. Why is D not correct? Can someone who has got this correct can please explain this .. will help all of us!
_________________

One Last Shot

Princeton Review Representative
Joined: 17 Jun 2013
Posts: 163
Followers: 140

Kudos [?]: 307 [1] , given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2013, 14:32
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
surya167 wrote:
The answer to this question is definitely not clear. Why is D not correct? Can someone who has got this correct can please explain this .. will help all of us!

"without natural preditors" is a modifier and as written, it modifies New Jersey, which is incorrect.

In C deer can have green expanses where hunting is not allowed therefore this is an appropriate modifier
_________________

Special offer! Save $250 on GMAT Ultimate Classroom, GMAT Small Group Instruction, or GMAT Liveonline when you use the promo code GCVERBAL250. Or, save$150 on GMAT Self-Prep when you use the code GCVERBAL150. Enroll at www.princetonreview.com

Intern
Joined: 16 Jun 2013
Posts: 18
GMAT 1: 540 Q34 V30
GMAT 2: 700 Q43 V42
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 8

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2013, 02:47
BeckyRobinsonTPR wrote:
surya167 wrote:
The answer to this question is definitely not clear. Why is D not correct? Can someone who has got this correct can please explain this .. will help all of us!

"without natural preditors" is a modifier and as written, it modifies New Jersey, which is incorrect.

In C deer can have green expanses where hunting is not allowed therefore this is an appropriate modifier

I'm now between C and D.
I don't get why it is incorrect to modify "New Jersey" with "without natural predators". It just says that New Jersey does not have any predators and on top of that hunting is not allowed in New Jersey expanses.
Is there no other reason why C is OA?
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 367
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 291

Re: With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2013, 05:40
I chose C but I have this doubt, this might be a bit silly but I feel C kinda changes the meaning. A talks about "not allowing hunting", while C says that "there is no hunting".
Re: With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban   [#permalink] 03 Dec 2013, 05:40

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 31 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods 0 02 Feb 2015, 05:04
2 With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban 6 25 Apr 2011, 08:13
25 With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods 14 03 Feb 2010, 23:18
12 With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban 12 28 Aug 2009, 02:16
8 With no natural predators and expenses of green suburban 11 08 Jul 2007, 10:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by