nisthagupta28 wrote:
With respect to most species of animals, they are evenly divided in right- or left-handedness, unlike humans.
With (preposition - it should be followed by a noun) respect to most species of animals,
they (no antecedent) are (plural verb) evenly (adverb) divided in right- or left-handedness, unlike humans.
Humans are compared to species of animals - incorrect because we are comparing one element of a set with the set.
Meaning - most species of animals are evenly divided in x or y. Humans are not evenly divided in x or y.
how do we interpret (comma + with, what does it modify) does it provide more information about the subject of the clause.
(B) With respect to right- or left-handedness, most species of animals are evenly divided, unlike in humans.
With respect to right- or left-handedness, (provides background)
- most species of animals (sub-plural) are evenly divided (plural verb) , unlike in humans.
incorrect species is compared to something in humans
(C) Unlike humans, most species of animals are evenly divided with respect to right- or left-handedness.
correct. humans are compared to most species.
with respect to right- or left-handedness - is a prepositional phrase and is appearing as an object in a clause - it is therefore modifying the verb - are evenly divided.
egmat GMATNinjaevenly is also modifying divided, the prepositional phrase is also modifying are divided. is it correct to have to modifiers modifying one entity.
(D) Unlike in humans, most species of animals with respect to right- or left-handedness are evenly divided.
same as B
(E) Unlike humans, with respect to right- or left-handedness, in most species of animals it is evenly divided.
same as B & D
First, a public service announcement: try to make your posts/questions easier for us to follow! This is one big mess, and it's hard to tell what you're even asking here. Take some time to neatly organize/format/proofread your posts, and you'll improve your odds of actually getting a useful response from an expert.
Quote:
how do we interpret (comma + with, what does it modify) does it provide more information about the subject of the clause.
It sounds like you're asking whether "with respect to most species of animals" in (A) modifies the subject
or the clause? In this case, I'd say it modifies the clause. We aren't trying to say, "they ARE with respect to most species of animals" -- in other words, we aren't trying to describe "they". Instead, we're trying to say, "they
are evenly divided with respect to..." In other words, we're trying to modify the action of the subject, not the subject itself.
Just keep in mind that it’s important not to treat all opening modifiers equally, as explained in
this post.
Quote:
evenly is also modifying divided, the prepositional phrase is also modifying are divided. is it correct to have to modifiers modifying one entity.
Generally speaking, it's certainly okay for two modifiers to modify the same entity. And I wouldn't drive yourself crazy trying to figure out EXACTLY what modifies what on the GMAT. Here, have an example:
"Tim is very happy in his new role."
Obviously "very" modifies "happy," but does the prepositional phrase ("in his new role") modify "is" or "is very happy" or "Tim is very happy"? More importantly: does it matter? The meaning is the same regardless of how you break it down. And since the GMAT is never going to ask you to formally diagram a sentence, you only need to worry about differences that affect the meaning.
Similarly, in (C), does the prepositional phrase ("with respect to...") modify "are" or "are evenly divided" or "most species of animals are evenly divided"? I'm not really sure, and, since it doesn't affect the meaning, I don't really care.
I hope that helps!
_________________
GMAT/GRE/EA tutors @
www.gmatninja.com (
hiring!) |
YouTube |
Articles |
IG Beginners' Guides:
RC |
CR |
SC |
Complete Resource Compilations:
RC |
CR |
SC YouTube LIVE webinars:
all videos by topic +
24-hour marathon for UkraineQuestion Explanation Collections:
RC |
CR |
SC