It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 16:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

With the emergence of private companies producing weapons

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3452

Kudos [?]: 924 [0], given: 781

With the emergence of private companies producing weapons [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2006, 15:53
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

17. With the emergence of private companies producing weapons for war, it is feared that they would shift information about their researches and developers as well as its projects to the new level of secrecy. This in turn would decrease the efficiency of each of the research/developer and prevent our country from being number one in weaponry development and production.

Which of the following, if true, would tend to most seriously weaken the prediction of the introduction of new levels of secrecy and its supposed outcome?

a. Our country is far ahead of any other country in the development of the weaponry.
b. Private companies that produce weapons of war in other countries have already installed new level of secrecy.
c. Researchers/developers in the field of weaponry do not know a lot about each other.
d. New level of secrecy would enable the companies to jump forward in the research/development, compared to such companies in other countries, as it would decrease the leak of information.
e. Researchers/developers in this field know everything about each other and the projects that are being worked on.

Kudos [?]: 924 [0], given: 781

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Re: GMAT Club CR Series #17 : Private Companies [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2006, 16:33
go with D.

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2892

Kudos [?]: 334 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2006, 18:29
Should be D.

If the new level of secrecy will enable the companies jump ahead of other companies then surely we are not at any disadvantage and this will not put us in #2 position.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 334 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 444

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2006, 21:32
Clearly D.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1728

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2006, 21:37
Will go with D.

D address both points mentioned in the passage.
--> Level of secrecy in private companies
--> and why it would help the country rather than make the country weak

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Location: India
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jul 2006, 05:23
Straight D.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 351

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jul 2006, 11:26
I beg to differ.I'll go with C.
This in turn would decrease the efficiency of each of the research/developer and prevent our country from being number one in weaponry development and production.

The new level of secrecy will not decrease the efficiency of researchers.

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 1

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jul 2006, 15:24
This question is VERY similar to the one in the OG about research and development in Pharmaceuticals... :wink:

the answer is D

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 27

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Woodland Hills, CA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jul 2006, 11:59
I think that zoom612 understood my logic in this question. And yes, u2lover, that question from the OG inspired me to come up with something similar... So, the correct answer, in my opinion is C.
The tension here is between the leak of information and the level to which people who work in the industry know each other. If there are links between researchers in different companies, then the new level of secrecy would cause these links to break. On the other hand, though, researchers might be inspired by each others' work which could cause some of them build on what others are working on and put some of the companies forward, though unfairly. as an example, imagine several researchers sharing thoughts with each other. this might cause one of them to start a project that someone else has merely dreamt about. the word 'efficiency' in the question stem plays an important role.
a. does not deal with the question stem directly, rather merely mentions an additional fact. we do not know how long it would take for our country to lose its position.
b. so what? we do not know the results. we have to have information in order to draw conclusions.
c. states that there are not many links, if at all, between researchers in different companies. this means that new levels of secrecy would not influence efficiency of the researchers work, as they are not inspired by each other's thoughts.
d. compares local companies with foreign markets, but does not indicate the relationship between the local companies. this answer suggests that most leaks help such companies abroad, giving them an unfair advantage. if the local researchers share their knowledge with each other and therefore boost efficiency, enabling our country to be number one in the field in the world, new levels of secrecy would make it impossible, decreasing efficiency of each individual researcher.
e. if the researchers know everything about each other and their work, then new level of secrecy would definitely decrease efficiency.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 790

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 2

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jul 2006, 12:31
Looks like C.

a) doesn't affect the argument in the question stem.
b) strengthens the argument. we are looking for weaken.
c) addresses both the points; it says - (1) the new level of secrecy is not reqd (2) also, since they already don't know the others, efficiency will not be affected even if the new level is introduced.
d) concentrates only on the 'efficiency' part... but not on the level of secrecy. the question mentions both...
e) strengthens the argument. we are looking for weaken.
_________________

Uh uh. I know what you're thinking. "Is the answer A, B, C, D or E?" Well to tell you the truth in all this excitement I kinda lost track myself. But you've gotta ask yourself one question: "Do I feel lucky?" Well, do ya, punk?

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 2

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jul 2006, 19:02
TestWriter wrote:
I think that zoom612 understood my logic in this question. And yes, u2lover, that question from the OG inspired me to come up with something similar... So, the correct answer, in my opinion is C.

The tension here is between the leak of information and the level to which people who work in the industry know each other. If there are links between researchers in different companies, then the new level of secrecy would cause these links to break. On the other hand, though, researchers might be inspired by each others' work which could cause some of them build on what others are working on and put some of the companies forward, though unfairly. as an example, imagine several researchers sharing thoughts with each other. this might cause one of them to start a project that someone else has merely dreamt about. the word 'efficiency' in the question stem plays an important role.

a. does not deal with the question stem directly, rather merely mentions an additional fact. we do not know how long it would take for our country to lose its position.

b. so what? we do not know the results. we have to have information in order to draw conclusions.

c. states that there are not many links, if at all, between researchers in different companies. this means that new levels of secrecy would not influence efficiency of the researchers work, as they are not inspired by each other's thoughts.

d. compares local companies with foreign markets, but does not indicate the relationship between the local companies. this answer suggests that most leaks help such companies abroad, giving them an unfair advantage. if the local researchers share their knowledge with each other and therefore boost efficiency, enabling our country to be number one in the field in the world, new levels of secrecy would make it impossible, decreasing efficiency of each individual researcher.

e. if the researchers know everything about each other and their work, then new level of secrecy would definitely decrease efficiency.


actually i chosed C at first and edited to D because the passage talks about researches/developers but not about researchers/developer. therefore, i changed my answer to D.

your OA(s) is(are) highly controversial unlike real CR questions and their answers.

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 567

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Location: Munich,Germany
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jul 2006, 19:24
completely agree with you MA. I followed the difference between "researches" and "researhers" and chose my answer.

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 04 Jul 2006, 19:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

With the emergence of private companies producing weapons

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.