tokugawa86 wrote:
machichi wrote:
Nonetheless, I bet some interviews leave them wondering if you can handle the work from an academic perspective. For example, if your spoken English is really poor (either as an English language learner or not) they will question your ability to contribute to the case method. Otherwise, I generally agree that the first check is to answer the "can you handle it" question.
I want to add that my guess is that for people on the bubble ("I wonder if they can handle the work?"), the adcom invites them to interview because the committee is willing to admit exceptional candidates with shaky quant skills. The question they are inadvertently asking is, "Are they worth it?" So by no means have you proven your complete academic chops in all cases. They are looking for a reason to admit you and hopefully the interview helps create that reason!
To your point however Yale SOM also has a strong applicant pool, so in addition to the "can you handle it?" part they're probably also screening for fit as well in the initial pass. If they read an application that suggests the applicant is using the school as a "safety" or the applicant did little to no little research on the school I'm sure the app goes straight to the 'ding' box.
Ahh I am really crossing my fingers that you are right about applicants using Yale as a "safety" and not doing as much research. I was super impressed with all of the prospective students I met on my interview day, but I did get the sense that Yale might be a back-up for some of them.
"Where all did you apply?" "Harvard, Stanford, Wharton...and Yale"
Whereas for me, Yale is a dream school. Hopefully I made that abundantly clear in my interview/application!