GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 24 Jun 2019, 04:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55757
Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 May 2019, 00:01
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (01:33) correct 47% (01:44) wrong based on 122 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence, Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.

Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not a responsible psychologist, Dr. Ladlow¡'s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.

Anson bases his conclusion about Dr. Ladlow on which one of the following?

(A) an attack on Dr. Ladlow¡'s character
(B) the application of a general principle
(C) the use of an ambiguous term
(D) the discrediting of facts
(E) the rejection of a theoretical explanation

_________________
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 21 Jul 2018
Posts: 4
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 May 2019, 17:05
I need some explaination. Tks!
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Posts: 81
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 May 2019, 01:29
2
Bunuel wrote:
Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence, Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.

Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not a responsible psychologist, Dr. Ladlow¡¯s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.

Anson bases his conclusion about Dr. Ladlow on which one of the following?

A. an attack on Dr. Ladlow¡¯s character
B. the application of a general principle
C. the use of an ambiguous term
D. the discrediting of facts
E. the rejectiion of a theoretical explanation



Anson conclusion : Dr. Ladlow is not a responsible psychologist.

The conclusion is based on the general principle "Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect. " It it stated in the stem that "Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct. " It means that Dr. Ladlow consider his theory flawless. Anson used this aboveforementioned general prinicple to conclude that Dr. Ladlow is not a responsible psychologist.
_________________
Hope it helps,

Thanks,
Mofe Bhatia
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 25 Apr 2019
Posts: 3
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 May 2019, 23:57
Only A and B are plausible.

Obviously, the conclusion is not based on an ad hominem, therefore, B.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly   [#permalink] 25 May 2019, 23:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne