Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 29 Jul 2015, 10:17
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 654
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 11:07
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (02:01) wrong based on 1 sessions
Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are more tolerant of unjust treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-rearing and pious. Moreover as most subjects believer that even the gods are on the side of the ruler, the subjects are less apt to move against him.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which AristotleтАЩs argument depends?

(A) The subjects of tyrannical rulers typically believe that there is a power other than the mortal.

(B) A tyrant cannot rule unless he has divine power on his side.

(C) The subjects of tyrannical rulers can rarely be fooled by appearances.

(D) Tyrants who are devoted to religion will not treat their subjects unjustly

(E) For a tyrant, the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion is a more effective means of ruling than unjust treatment.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1794
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 11:49
A and B look good.
I will go with A
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 503
Location: 55405
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 12:10
Agree that A looks good, but posit that B looks like dog vomit.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4308
Followers: 29

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 12:21
I believe A is the answer also. B cannot be it because it nowhere mentioned in the statement that a ruler cannot rule if he has no divine power by his side. The premise only says that the subjects of a God-rearing ruler will be less prone to move against him but there is no mention about the ruler not being able to rule without such divine power. C was misleading but it rather weakens the argument instead of being an assumption
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 654
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 12:49
Paul wrote:
I believe A is the answer also. B cannot be it because it nowhere mentioned in the statement that a ruler cannot rule if he has no divine power by his side. The premise only says that the subjects of a God-rearing ruler will be less prone to move against him but there is no mention about the ruler not being able to rule without such divine power. C was misleading but it rather weakens the argument instead of being an assumption


Can someone translate the argument(question stem) into 21th century English that can
be understood by 4 year old. :?
GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 770
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 03 Feb 2004, 04:42
kpadma wrote:
Paul wrote:
I believe A is the answer also. B cannot be it because it nowhere mentioned in the statement that a ruler cannot rule if he has no divine power by his side. The premise only says that the subjects of a God-rearing ruler will be less prone to move against him but there is no mention about the ruler not being able to rule without such divine power. C was misleading but it rather weakens the argument instead of being an assumption


Can someone translate the argument(question stem) into 21th century English that can
be understood by 4 year old. :?


Both premises in the statement describe a favorable relationship between the ruler and the gods. Hence, in order for this to have an effect upon the ruler's subjects, they must also believe in the gods else the effect of this relationship is moot.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

  [#permalink] 03 Feb 2004, 04:42
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Aristotle CR. Economic considerations colour every aspect of jamifahad 17 25 Jul 2011, 03:11
2 Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put ansgmat 8 23 Feb 2011, 10:22
Anyone tried these questions from aristotle? kt00381n 3 05 Dec 2010, 07:26
Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put tenaman10 8 17 Jun 2009, 06:18
The more safety restrictions the government puts on twilight 10 30 Nov 2008, 10:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.