Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Jun 2013, 00:02
Customize  |  Hide

Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 716
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 12:07
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (02:01) wrong based on 1 sessions
Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are more tolerant of unjust treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-rearing and pious. Moreover as most subjects believer that even the gods are on the side of the ruler, the subjects are less apt to move against him.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which AristotleтАЩs argument depends?

(A) The subjects of tyrannical rulers typically believe that there is a power other than the mortal.

(B) A tyrant cannot rule unless he has divine power on his side.

(C) The subjects of tyrannical rulers can rarely be fooled by appearances.

(D) Tyrants who are devoted to religion will not treat their subjects unjustly

(E) For a tyrant, the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion is a more effective means of ruling than unjust treatment.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1963
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 12:49
A and B look good.
I will go with A
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 533
Location: 55405
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 13:10
Agree that A looks good, but posit that B looks like dog vomit.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4441
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 13:21
I believe A is the answer also. B cannot be it because it nowhere mentioned in the statement that a ruler cannot rule if he has no divine power by his side. The premise only says that the subjects of a God-rearing ruler will be less prone to move against him but there is no mention about the ruler not being able to rule without such divine power. C was misleading but it rather weakens the argument instead of being an assumption
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 95
Location: China
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 13:31
I vote for B
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 716
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 13:49
Paul wrote:
I believe A is the answer also. B cannot be it because it nowhere mentioned in the statement that a ruler cannot rule if he has no divine power by his side. The premise only says that the subjects of a God-rearing ruler will be less prone to move against him but there is no mention about the ruler not being able to rule without such divine power. C was misleading but it rather weakens the argument instead of being an assumption


Can someone translate the argument(question stem) into 21th century English that can
be understood by 4 year old. :?
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 09 Dec 2003
Posts: 22
Location: Stockholm
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Feb 2004, 14:53
One more for A
_________________

Salvador aí vou eu!!!

GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 773
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Feb 2004, 05:42
kpadma wrote:
Paul wrote:
I believe A is the answer also. B cannot be it because it nowhere mentioned in the statement that a ruler cannot rule if he has no divine power by his side. The premise only says that the subjects of a God-rearing ruler will be less prone to move against him but there is no mention about the ruler not being able to rule without such divine power. C was misleading but it rather weakens the argument instead of being an assumption


Can someone translate the argument(question stem) into 21th century English that can
be understood by 4 year old. :?


Both premises in the statement describe a favorable relationship between the ruler and the gods. Hence, in order for this to have an effect upon the ruler's subjects, they must also believe in the gods else the effect of this relationship is moot.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

  [#permalink] 03 Feb 2004, 05:42
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put Vithal 15 20 Mar 2005, 18:18
New posts Unlike H. G. Wells, who wrote more than 100 books, and rishi2377 2 11 Sep 2007, 11:48
New posts Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put tenaman10 8 17 Jun 2009, 07:18
New posts Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put ansgmat 7 23 Feb 2011, 11:22
New posts 4 I would like to thank whoever it was that wrote that piece jitbec 4 09 Sep 2011, 08:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.