Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 May 2013, 02:56
Customize  |  Hide

Is |A - B | > | A - C | ? 1) | B | > | C | 2) A > 0

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 716
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Is |A - B | > | A - C | ? 1) | B | > | C | 2) A > 0 [#permalink] New post 24 Feb 2004, 00:27
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Is |A - B | > | A - C | ?

1) | B | > | C |
2) A > 0

Any method other than picking numbers to solve this problem is
greatly apprecaited!
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 716
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Feb 2004, 08:37
anandnk wrote:
Is E the answer ?

No official answers, but I also got E.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 361
Location: Illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: DS - MOD [#permalink] New post 26 Feb 2004, 11:11
kpadma wrote:
Is |A - B | > | A - C | ?

1) | B | > | C |
2) A > 0

Any method other than picking numbers to solve this problem is
greatly apprecaited!


The method other than picking the number:

imagine FOUR points A, B, C and O on the number line. O corresponds to 0 on the number line

Now the question is |A - B | > | A - C | which is basically asking: is the segment AB > segment AC on the number line?

Statement 1 : Segment BO > segment CO, In other words, B is farther than C from 0. B and C could be on either side of 0. But the absolute distance of B from 0 is greater than the absolute distance of C from 0. we do not know the position of A. So not suffeciaent.

Statement 2: it is self explanatory. In our number line, this does not help us identify the position of point B and C. NOT SUFFECIENT

Both together: If you combine the above two explanation, you will realize that it is not suffecient.

So the answer E
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1963
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Feb 2004, 11:16
hi gmatblast,


Have u ever taught kids? This is one of the best explanation I have come across. I will definitely apply this in Quant.

Anand.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 361
Location: Illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Feb 2004, 12:15
anandnk wrote:
hi gmatblast,


Have u ever taught kids? This is one of the best explanation I have come across. I will definitely apply this in Quant.

Anand.


Well I am glad you liked the explanation. And as for teaching kids, nop I have never taught to any kids... now as you have mentioned, I should probably think about it in future. :-D

By the way, I got the concept of distance for absolute value from the following link. You are probably already aware of it. But just in case

http://www.purplemath.com/modules/absolute.htm
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 716
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Feb 2004, 16:32
gmatblast wrote:

By the way, I got the concept of distance for absolute value from the following link. You are probably already aware of it. But just in case

http://www.purplemath.com/modules/absolute.htm


Good explanation, Gmatblast, Thanks :idea:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 369
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: DS - MOD [#permalink] New post 19 May 2004, 08:23
gmatblast wrote:
kpadma wrote:
Is |A - B | > | A - C | ?

1) | B | > | C |
2) A > 0

Any method other than picking numbers to solve this problem is
greatly apprecaited!


The method other than picking the number:

imagine FOUR points A, B, C and O on the number line. O corresponds to 0 on the number line

Now the question is |A - B | > | A - C | which is basically asking: is the segment AB > segment AC on the number line?

Statement 1 : Segment BO > segment CO, In other words, B is farther than C from 0. B and C could be on either side of 0. But the absolute distance of B from 0 is greater than the absolute distance of C from 0. we do not know the position of A. So not suffeciaent.

Statement 2: it is self explanatory. In our number line, this does not help us identify the position of point B and C. NOT SUFFECIENT

Both together: If you combine the above two explanation, you will realize that it is not suffecient.

So the answer E


AWESOME!!!!!!!!!! :woohoo :wave
Re: DS - MOD   [#permalink] 19 May 2004, 08:23
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts a+b)^2 * (b-c)] / >= 0 ? 1- a>b 2- b>c Paul 4 06 Nov 2004, 19:08
Popular new posts If b cannot equal 0 and a>b, is a>c? 1. a/b>c/b 2. GMATT73 10 01 Dec 2005, 06:44
New posts If a>0, b>0, c>0, Is a(b-c)=0 1) b-c=c-b 2) b/c=c/b IndianJaguar 6 06 Jun 2008, 11:19
New posts If A = {B}/{C} , is A> B 1. 0< C <1 2. A > 0 arjtryarjtry 3 28 Aug 2008, 11:52
New posts 2 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC is (a-b)/c >0? 1. a>b, b<c 2. a<b, b<c Creeper300 2 07 Nov 2010, 13:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Is |A - B | > | A - C | ? 1) | B | > | C | 2) A > 0

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.