Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 25 Aug 2016, 03:08

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Spaceland Strategy Question #6

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 02 Mar 2011
Posts: 12
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2011, 07:22
1
KUDOS
NOTE: This question is not representative of an actual GMAT question, but the strategy used to determine the answer is applicable on some GMAT problems.

Q. Which of the following must be true?

x > 1
x > 2
x > 3
x > 4
x > 5

How can this question be answered?

Solution

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Though this is an extreme example, logic will sometimes eliminate answer choices since only one answer can be correct and one answer has to be correct.

If x is greater than two, then it must also be greater than one. Both answers can't be correct so answer B cannot be correct. The same thing is true of each other answer too--if x is larger than 3, 4, or 5 it is larger than one. C, D, and E cannot be selected without multiple answers being correct. The only answer that doesn't force any other answer also be true is A.

This doesn't mean that a less restrictive answer is always correct, simply that a more restrictive answer cannot be correct.

Additionally, on Roman numeral problems, if one Roman numeral statement is more restrictive, and inclusive of, than another, confirmation of the more restrictive one confirms the other. Conversely, disqualification of the less restrictive statement also disqualifies the more restrictive statement.
SVP
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1673
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 34

Kudos [?]: 470 [0], given: 36

Re: Spaceland Strategy Question #6 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2011, 19:54
Is this the total information in the question ?
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 3344
Location: India
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 1372

Kudos [?]: 10174 [1] , given: 1852

Re: Spaceland Strategy Question #6 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2013, 01:11
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
This is a brilliant question.
I was totally stumped but the solution was superb.
_________________
Re: Spaceland Strategy Question #6   [#permalink] 30 Jan 2013, 01:11
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
First time poster with a Prep Strategy Question 3 03 Mar 2014, 13:47
1 Question with Manhattan Functions Strategy section 2 16 Feb 2013, 21:13
DS strategy questions for the experts 3 13 Apr 2012, 12:32
6 Which Questions to skip? - Strategy 9 30 Jan 2012, 05:28
Stuck on Kaplan Maths WB 6th Edition - Algebra Question P125 4 23 Jan 2010, 08:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by