Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 31 Oct 2014, 01:51

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A recent report on an environmental improvement program was

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 329 [1] , given: 1

Premium Member
A recent report on an environmental improvement program was [#permalink] New post 18 May 2009, 23:04
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (02:13) correct 37% (01:20) wrong based on 392 sessions
A recent report on an environmental improvement program was criticized for focusing solely on pragmatic solutions to the large number of significant problems that plague the program instead of seriously trying to produce a coherent vision for the future of the program. In response the report’s authors granted that the critics had raised a valid point but explained that, to do anything at all, the program needed continued government funding, and that to get such funding the program first needed to regain a reputation for competence.

1.The basic position taken by the report’s authors on the criticism leveled against the report is that
(A) addressing the critics’ concern now would be premature
(B) the critics’ motives are self-serving
(C) the notion of a coherent vision would be inappropriate to a program of the sort at issue
(D) the authors of the report are more knowledgeable than its critics
(E) giving the report a single focus is less desirable than the critics claim

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
A


2. Which one of the following, if true, would best serve the critics of the report in their attempt to undermine the position taken by the report’s authors?
(A) The government does not actually provide a full l00 percent of the program’s funding.
(B) The program will continue to have numerous serious problems precisely because it lacks a coherent vision for its future.
(C) The program had a coherent vision at its inception, but that vision has proved impossible to sustain.
(D) The government has threatened to cut off funding for the program but has not acted yet on this threat.
(E) The program has acquired a worse reputation for incompetence than it deserves.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
B
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount Codes
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 May 2009
Posts: 68
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 11

Re: improvement program [#permalink] New post 19 May 2009, 00:08
1. A ( others are irrelevant)
2. B ( because the program will have problems, the program will never gain the reputation for comptence)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 258
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 1

Re: improvement program [#permalink] New post 19 May 2009, 01:18
IMO A, B

A recent report on an environmental improvement program was criticized for focusing solely on pragmatic solutions to the large number of significant problems that plague the program instead of seriously trying to produce a coherent vision for the future of the program. In response the report’s authors granted that the critics had raised a valid point but explained that, to do anything at all, the program needed continued government funding, and that to get such funding the program first needed to regain a reputation for competence.

1.The basic position taken by the report’s authors on the criticism leveled against the report is that
(A) addressing the critics’ concern now would be premature --> best. (use POE)
(B) the critics’ motives are self-serving -->no info
(C) the notion of a coherent vision would be inappropriate to a program of the sort at issue -->the reports' author does not deny the valid point of the notion of coherent vision
(D) the authors of the report are more knowledgeable than its critics --> ridiculous
(E) giving the report a single focus is less desirable than the critics claim -->counter fact

2. Which one of the following, if true, would best serve the critics of the report in their attempt to undermine the position taken by the report’s authors?
(A) The government does not actually provide a full l00 percent of the program’s funding -->out of scope
(B) The program will continue to have numerous serious problems precisely because it lacks a coherent vision for its future -->strengthen
(C) The program had a coherent vision at its inception, but that vision has proved impossible to sustain -->weaken
(D) The government has threatened to cut off funding for the program but has not acted yet on this threat -->weaken
(E) The program has acquired a worse reputation for incompetence than it deserves -->weaken
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 295
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 3

Re: improvement program [#permalink] New post 19 May 2009, 03:11
IMO A, D...

in the second question, D is more attractive than B as it directly attacks the authors claim that its pragmatic solutions are needed for government funding. and if Govt funding is threatened, then the authors claim is weakened.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 267
Location: nj
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 2

Re: improvement program [#permalink] New post 20 May 2009, 13:50
A
B ( if the problems continued then the program will never regain its reputation for competence)
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 329 [0], given: 1

Premium Member
Re: improvement program [#permalink] New post 20 May 2009, 23:44
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2010
Posts: 268
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 2

Re: improvement program [#permalink] New post 19 Mar 2010, 09:31
sondenso wrote:
A recent report on an environmental improvement program was criticized for focusing solely on pragmatic solutions to the large number of significant problems that plague the program instead of seriously trying to produce a coherent vision for the future of the program. In response the report’s authors granted that the critics had raised a valid point but explained that, to do anything at all, the program needed continued government funding, and that to get such funding the program first needed to regain a reputation for competence.
1.The basic position taken by the report’s authors on the criticism leveled against the report is that
(A) addressing the critics’ concern now would be premature
(B) the critics’ motives are self-serving
(C) the notion of a coherent vision would be inappropriate to a program of the sort at issue
(D) the authors of the report are more knowledgeable than its critics
(E) giving the report a single focus is less desirable than the critics claim
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
A


It has to be A.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Posts: 329
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 44

Re: improvement program [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2010, 23:26
A, B
4 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 354
Location: San Francisco
Followers: 341

Kudos [?]: 754 [4] , given: 11

Re: improvement program [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2010, 19:12
4
This post received
KUDOS
Hey All,

Even though a lot of agreement on this one in terms of the answer, no one seems to have really gone all out to explain what's going on through technique. Because at least one person had questions, I figured I'd take them on. Let's do it!

A recent report on an environmental improvement program was criticized for focusing solely on pragmatic solutions to the large number of significant problems that plague the program instead of seriously trying to produce a coherent vision for the future of the program. In response the report’s authors granted that the critics had raised a valid point but explained that, to do anything at all, the program needed continued government funding, and that to get such funding the program first needed to regain a reputation for competence.

Criticism: Report criticized for focusing on fix problems, not thinking of future.
Response: To move forward, need funding, and funding comes with competence.

1.The basic position taken by the report’s authors on the criticism leveled against the report is that
(A) addressing the critics’ concern now would be premature
ANSWER: This argument is about the future, and the authors are focusing on the present. This is correct, because they're arguing that they need to get funding (in the present) before worrying about the future).

(B) the critics’ motives are self-serving
PROBLEM: No information is given on the motives of the critics.

(C) the notion of a coherent vision would be inappropriate to a program of the sort at issue
PROBLEM: We can't ignore that "critics raised a valid point". They agree about the vision, but only say they can't worry about it unless they continue to get funding.

(D) the authors of the report are more knowledgeable than its critics
PROBLEM: Whether or not this is true, the authors do not mention that they have any kind of special knowledge.

(E) giving the report a single focus is less desirable than the critics claim
PROBLEM: Again, they don't disagree with the critics, except to say that they need to worry about something else first.


2. Which one of the following, if true, would best serve the critics of the report in their attempt to undermine the position taken by the report’s authors?

(A) The government does not actually provide a full l00 percent of the program’s funding.
PROBLEM: Doesn't have to be a full 100%. Now, if it only provided 1%, that would be a different issue.

(B) The program will continue to have numerous serious problems precisely because it lacks a coherent vision for its future.
ANSWER: This means that they will never be seen as competent until they worry about the future, so the authors argument doesn't make any sense.

(C) The program had a coherent vision at its inception, but that vision has proved impossible to sustain.
PROBLEM: This wouldn't help at all. In fact, it might even hurt the argument to say that the vision is impossible to sustain (because then why would it be worth worrying about?).

(D) The government has threatened to cut off funding for the program but has not acted yet on this threat.
PROBLEM: Again, this would probably HELP the author's argument, because their worries about government funding in the present are critical.

(E) The program has acquired a worse reputation for incompetence than it deserves.
PROBLEM: This doesn't help anyone, because even if the program isn't as bad as it sounds, it still needs funding, and it still needs vision.

Hope that helps!

-t
_________________


Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Posts: 67
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 3

Re: improvement program [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2010, 23:27
A.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 80
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: improvement program [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2011, 12:54
agreed A&B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Posts: 121
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 6

Re: improvement program [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2011, 18:00
1. A
2. B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: A continuous journey of self-improvement is essential for every person -Socrates
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 72
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 14

Re: improvement program [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2011, 20:01
Thanks Tommy for explaining the difference between B and D in second question. +1.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Posts: 195
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 6

Re: A recent report on an environmental improvement program was [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2012, 21:54
IMO A & B....... 8-) 8-) 8-)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jan 2012
Posts: 90
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: Q39 V29
GPA: 3.3
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 7

CAT Tests
Re: A recent report on an environmental improvement program was [#permalink] New post 28 Mar 2012, 01:45
A and B
Straight answers
_________________

Press +1 Kudos rather than saying thanks
which is more helpful infact..

Ill be posting good questions as many as I can...

Towards Success

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1125
Location: United States
Followers: 140

Kudos [?]: 1400 [0], given: 122

Re: A recent report on an environmental improvement program was [#permalink] New post 28 Mar 2013, 13:09
A and B are correct. Here my 2 cents.

For the 1st question:
Premise: Critics say the program focuses only on pragmatic solutions and it doesn't have coherent vision for the future of program.
Premise: Author: to get government funding, the program has to regain reputation first. Assumption is: reputation will be sustained in the long term. (if the reputation couldn't be sustained, the government won't finance the program.). That's the key assumption.
Author's conclusion: critics raised a valid point, but to do anything.

The author means the critics' point is valid but premature to conclude that the program has no coherent vision. --> A

For the 2nd question:
To break the author's logic, critics must show the flaw of author's assumption. B clearly supports critics by showing that the program's reputation couldn't be sustained in the long term. Hence, B is correct.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Apr 2013
Posts: 16
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: A recent report on an environmental improvement program was [#permalink] New post 08 Apr 2013, 01:24
Has to be 'A'.

PS Why do people put down two answers, like 'My answer is A & B'? Makes no sense, you can only have ONE ANSWER
Re: A recent report on an environmental improvement program was   [#permalink] 08 Apr 2013, 01:24
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
At a recent conference on environmental threats to the North sasha40612 0 18 Aug 2014, 20:11
5 Experts publish their posts in the topic At a recent conference on environmental threats to the North TomB 2 19 Jan 2012, 09:20
A recent report on an environmental improvement program was tenaman10 4 05 Jun 2009, 09:05
11 At a recent conference on environmental threats to the North sandipan.mondal 18 09 Oct 2007, 02:06
At a recent conference on environmental threats to the North kdhong 17 11 Jul 2005, 19:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A recent report on an environmental improvement program was

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.