Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 06:50 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 06:50

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Apr 2013
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Mar 2013
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 27 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 63 [0]
Given Kudos: 34
Send PM
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Status:Current Tuckie!
Posts: 539
Own Kudos [?]: 209 [0]
Given Kudos: 105
Location: United Kingdom
Schools: Tuck '16 (M$)
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 740 Q48 V44
Send PM
Re: Alternative Transcript - MSc Finance vs Courses [#permalink]
Bearing in mind you're from North Ireland, I am guessing the MSc in Finance would be from a UK Uni? Because there does seem to be a big drop off in terms of brand name recognition of UK Universities. Even those ranked 5-10 suffer when compared to the top 5 I think. So depending on where you're studying, it may not be that useful. Also Adcoms may look at the fact that you have an MSc in Finance and think why do you need to do an MBA right after finish it.

I think the most important thing to ask yourself really is whether you actually want to do an MSc in Finance. If you are doing it for the sake of getting a good quantitative grade as part of your application, then I don't think it's worth it. You're better off taking some online classes that others have had success with like the UCLA extension courses and building up a solid quant profile with calculus, macro, micro, and other similar subjects. I think that would be enough to let the Adcom know you can handle the quantitative side of an MBA. Finally the most important thing would be to write a good Optional Essay explaining why you got a bad grade and how you rectified it or learnt from it.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Posts: 107
Own Kudos [?]: 22 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V41
WE:Information Technology (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Send PM
Re: Alternative Transcript - MSc Finance vs Courses [#permalink]
JDonaghy13,

If your intention to do an Msc. Finance is to make your profile seem better in the eyes of the adcom then I would advise you to not waste your time, effort and money on this. The fact that you are already 29 should weigh even more heavier. MBAs are getting younger. Wasting 2 years on a part-time degree learning finance for the purpose of getting into an MBA makes no sense. You already know you want to do an MBA, then why wait for 2 more years, especially at this point on your caeer? This in my opinion would reflect very poorly about your judgement. Doing a part-time masters would also impact your ability to perform well at work. The experience and skills you gain from your work is infinitely more important for you at this stage in your career.

Score well in your GMAT and if you have time take the MBA online courses from UCLA. Own up to the fact that your Grades were bad in UG. Most of us would belong to the category of smart but lazy during UG or smart but lost our ways during UG. Address those areas.

PS: I have low UG GPA, did Part-time Msc. in Finance and am also doing UCLA extension courses.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Alternative Transcript - MSc Finance vs Courses [#permalink]

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne