Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 May 2013, 07:24
Customize  |  Hide

celestial events

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2003
Posts: 50
Location: LA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

celestial events [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2004, 21:58
Dobson: Some historians claim that the people
who built a ring of stones thousands of years ago
in Britain were knowledgeable about celestial
events. The ground for this claim is that two of the
stones determine a line pointing directly to the
position of the sun at sunrise at the spring
equinox. There are many stones in the ring,
however, so the chance that one pair will point in
a celestially significant direction is large.
Therefore, the people who built the ring were not
knowledgeable about celestial events.

Which one of the following is an error of reasoning
in DobsonтАЩs argument?

(A) The failure of cited evidence to establish a
statement is taken as evidence that that
statement is false.
(B) DobsonтАЩs conclusion logically contradicts some
of the evidence presented in support of it.
(C) Statements that absolutely establish DobsonтАЩs
conclusion are treated as if they merely give
some support to that conclusion.
(D) Something that is merely a matter of opinion is
treated as if it were subject to verification as a
matter of fact.
(E) DobsonтАЩs drawing the conclusion relies on
interpreting a key term in two different ways.
VP
VP
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 1079
Location: USA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2004, 22:23
Is it (D)?
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4441
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2004, 22:39
Hesitated between A and D but final answer would be D. The fact that there are many stones, combined with the opinion that 2 of them pointing to a celestial direction is being very likely is treated as a fact that those who built the stones were not that knowledgeable after all. Relatively difficult.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 533
Location: 55405
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2004, 23:10
I'm going with A here, Paul.

And I say Easy, with a capital E.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 533
Location: 55405
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2004, 23:12
Quote:
There are many stones in the ring,
however, so the chance that one pair will point in
a celestially significant direction is large.

Therefore, the people who built the ring were not
knowledgeable about celestial events.


A proper conclusion would be "therefore, the ring should not serve as evidence that its builders were knowledgeable about celestial events"
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2003
Posts: 50
Location: LA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2004, 23:59
Answer is A.
  [#permalink] 11 Jan 2004, 23:59
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts Quasars---celestial objects so far away that their light chunjuwu 10 02 Sep 2004, 03:59
New posts Event A and Event B are independent. Is the probability that bmwhype2 6 23 Oct 2007, 08:13
New posts 2 What is the probability that event E or event F or both will albany09 4 09 Oct 2008, 06:16
New posts The Event adalfu 0 21 Sep 2010, 10:42
New posts LGBT Event machichi 0 11 Aug 2012, 13:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

celestial events

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.