Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 26 May 2016, 04:13
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

cr - Political system

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 424
Location: Aus
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

cr - Political system [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2004, 12:07
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Please explain your answer

In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.

If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?

(A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.
(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.
(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.
(D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.
(E) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 851
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2004, 12:51
C here! (2 min 21s)

<not able to justify fully. Will attempt to think it over >
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 964
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2004, 13:04
B for me.
before 50% to 1, 50% to 2
after 3rd party: either 1 or 2 loose its candidates. Thus, the % of vote for either party won't be more than 1/2 or 50%.

C: new candidate will either vote for 1 or 2, but can also vote for the 3rd party. No restriction for her.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 851
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2004, 13:14
Why cann't the % be more than 50?

Say there are in all 100 voters and 50 vote for 1 and 50 for 2

now with the third candidate coming in, it could be 25 for 1, 20 for 3 and 55 for 2 !


<B>
before 50% to 1, 50% to 2
after 3rd party: either 1 or 2 loose its candidates. Thus, the % of vote for either party won't be more than 1/2 or 50%.
</B>
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 964
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2004, 14:01
Vithal wrote:
Why cann't the % be more than 50?

Say there are in all 100 voters and 50 vote for 1 and 50 for 2

now with the third candidate coming in, it could be 25 for 1, 20 for 3 and 55 for 2 !


see the premise (bold):

The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2004
Posts: 154
Location: san jose,ca
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2004, 14:26
B
(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.

both have equal votes and are not going to increase votes because of the 3rd party.

There are couple of small assumptions here that no new voters show up and the voters' opinion does not change during the period of 3rd party emergence and actual election time.However B says "is likely to capture", so there is no firm commitment but will likely happen, I agree with the statement.I go with B.
_________________

GS
No excuses - Need 750!!!

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 266
Location: Hanoi
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2004, 01:15
It is B. The stem states "The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate". It doesn't mean that it doesn't take new voters
_________________

"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 402
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2004, 01:45
(B) for sure.

Also note that (C) is too strong "never"
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Jun 2004
Posts: 171
Location: Noida, UP
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2004, 01:53
There is an inherent assumption that not more than one half of the new voters go to the one party that is not affected by the third candidate,. If we assume this to be true, then B makes sense. Else none of the oiptions could be chosen.
_________________

--

./abisurd
Not absurd :)

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1811
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2004, 13:10
B is my FA. Reasoning given by dj
  [#permalink] 19 Jul 2004, 13:10
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Political scientist: As a political system EchelonStrike2016 2 12 Dec 2014, 09:00
2 Political scientist: As a political system, democracy does smbhumkar 3 15 May 2012, 11:47
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Political scientist: As a political system, democracy does noboru 4 23 Sep 2009, 12:30
CR - Immune-system spriya 13 30 Jun 2008, 10:23
CR: Computer System govinam 17 28 Sep 2006, 16:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by

cr - Political system

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.