GMAT Question Feedback from ETS : GMAT Verbal Section
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 07 Dec 2016, 06:41

# Chicago-Booth

is Releasing R1 Admission Decisions | Keep Watch on App Tracker | Join Chat Room2 for Live Updates

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# GMAT Question Feedback from ETS

Author Message
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V0
GMAT 2: 700 Q V
GMAT 3: 740 Q40 V50
GMAT 4: 700 Q48 V38
GMAT 5: 710 Q45 V41
GMAT 6: 680 Q47 V36
GMAT 7: Q42 V44
GMAT 8: Q42 V44
GMAT 9: 740 Q49 V42
GMAT 10: 740 Q V
GMAT 11: 500 Q47 V33
GMAT 12: 670 Q V
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 100951

GMAT Question Feedback from ETS [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2003, 12:26
The question was about a method for evaluating a new cost-cutting
manufacturing process in which companies project the results of adopting or
not adopting the new process against a fixed background of costs, selling
prices, and market share. The question asked test-takers to find a drawback
to this method of evaluation.

You expressed a concern about the explanation given for choice B. The fact
that the evaluation of the method is conducted against a fixed background
does not mean that the background cannot include complex variations in such
things as interest rates. That is, if someone predicts that interest rates
are going to fall, for example, then the benefit of adopting the method can
be evaluated against that prediction, and if necessary the planned adoption
date can be altered.

The case for choice D is different. What D points out is that the outcome
of the evaluation process can affect the factors that are in the fixed
background; investing in the new process can lead to lower prices and higher
market share, upsetting the very analysis used to justify that investment.
You question our claim that the method overvalues the noninvestment option;
whether it does so depends on whether you take the perspective of a company
that is deciding whether to adopt or that of a competitor that has decided
in favor of adopting, but from either perspective there is a systematic
misestimation.
This is about my tough CR.
Cheers!
Victor
If you have any questions
New!
Founder
Affiliations: AS - Gold, HH-Diamond
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 14232
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 3650

Kudos [?]: 22428 [0], given: 4445

Re: GMAT Question Feedback from ETS [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2003, 12:28
VTay25 wrote:
The question was about a method for evaluating a new cost-cutting
manufacturing process in which companies project the results of adopting or
not adopting the new process against a fixed background of costs, selling
prices, and market share. The question asked test-takers to find a drawback
to this method of evaluation.

You expressed a concern about the explanation given for choice B. The fact
that the evaluation of the method is conducted against a fixed background
does not mean that the background cannot include complex variations in such
things as interest rates. That is, if someone predicts that interest rates
are going to fall, for example, then the benefit of adopting the method can
be evaluated against that prediction, and if necessary the planned adoption
date can be altered.

The case for choice D is different. What D points out is that the outcome
of the evaluation process can affect the factors that are in the fixed
background; investing in the new process can lead to lower prices and higher
market share, upsetting the very analysis used to justify that investment.
You question our claim that the method overvalues the noninvestment option;
whether it does so depends on whether you take the perspective of a company
that is deciding whether to adopt or that of a competitor that has decided
in favor of adopting, but from either perspective there is a systematic
misestimation.
This is about my tough CR.
Cheers!
Victor

Really?

--
Re: GMAT Question Feedback from ETS   [#permalink] 21 May 2003, 12:28
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Questions on Relative clauses from GMAT club Grammar book -Exercise 26 4 20 Jul 2015, 16:31
GMAT Question Directories from BB 0 21 Sep 2014, 07:39
2 Sentence Correction Question from Princeton 1 25 Jul 2014, 02:04
1 ask me questions . I got 760 in GMAT . I am from ShangHai 2 04 Feb 2008, 08:14
Verbal Questions from the OG 11 1 01 Jul 2007, 22:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by