Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Aug 2014, 03:29

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

GMAT Question Feedback from ETS

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Other
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 660 Q V
GPA: 3.64
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 76079

GMAT Question Feedback from ETS [#permalink] New post 21 May 2003, 12:26
The question was about a method for evaluating a new cost-cutting
manufacturing process in which companies project the results of adopting or
not adopting the new process against a fixed background of costs, selling
prices, and market share. The question asked test-takers to find a drawback
to this method of evaluation.

You expressed a concern about the explanation given for choice B. The fact
that the evaluation of the method is conducted against a fixed background
does not mean that the background cannot include complex variations in such
things as interest rates. That is, if someone predicts that interest rates
are going to fall, for example, then the benefit of adopting the method can
be evaluated against that prediction, and if necessary the planned adoption
date can be altered.

The case for choice D is different. What D points out is that the outcome
of the evaluation process can affect the factors that are in the fixed
background; investing in the new process can lead to lower prices and higher
market share, upsetting the very analysis used to justify that investment.
You question our claim that the method overvalues the noninvestment option;
whether it does so depends on whether you take the perspective of a company
that is deciding whether to adopt or that of a competitor that has decided
in favor of adopting, but from either perspective there is a systematic
misestimation.
This is about my tough CR.
Cheers!
Victor
Expert Post
Founder
Founder
User avatar
Affiliations: UA-1K, SPG-G, HH-D
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 12068
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Hospitality and Tourism)
Followers: 2222

Kudos [?]: 8234 [0], given: 3641

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: GMAT Question Feedback from ETS [#permalink] New post 21 May 2003, 12:28
Expert's post
VTay25 wrote:
The question was about a method for evaluating a new cost-cutting
manufacturing process in which companies project the results of adopting or
not adopting the new process against a fixed background of costs, selling
prices, and market share. The question asked test-takers to find a drawback
to this method of evaluation.

You expressed a concern about the explanation given for choice B. The fact
that the evaluation of the method is conducted against a fixed background
does not mean that the background cannot include complex variations in such
things as interest rates. That is, if someone predicts that interest rates
are going to fall, for example, then the benefit of adopting the method can
be evaluated against that prediction, and if necessary the planned adoption
date can be altered.

The case for choice D is different. What D points out is that the outcome
of the evaluation process can affect the factors that are in the fixed
background; investing in the new process can lead to lower prices and higher
market share, upsetting the very analysis used to justify that investment.
You question our claim that the method overvalues the noninvestment option;
whether it does so depends on whether you take the perspective of a company
that is deciding whether to adopt or that of a competitor that has decided
in favor of adopting, but from either perspective there is a systematic
misestimation.
This is about my tough CR.
Cheers!
Victor


Is this ETS's reply?
Really?

--
Re: GMAT Question Feedback from ETS   [#permalink] 21 May 2003, 12:28
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic GMAT and ETS frontloop33 2 24 Jun 2011, 01:19
Experts publish their posts in the topic Student Majors SC problem from ETS GMAT exam tonebeeze 4 12 Oct 2010, 11:02
1 Tough SC problem from ETS paper GMAT tonebeeze 5 11 Oct 2010, 18:06
2 questions from ETS practice tests peachtree 3 18 Jul 2006, 08:55
ETS Paper Gmat tests kayser`soze 1 28 Jul 2005, 11:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

GMAT Question Feedback from ETS

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.