|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 01 Apr 2006
Posts: 185
Location: Toronto, Canada
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
GmatPrep: CR question (interview) [#permalink]
19 Aug 2006, 06:58
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Here is a question from GmatPrep.
Attachments

Verbal_Q1_noAns.JPG [ 83.72 KiB | Viewed 231 times ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5289
Followers: 17
Kudos [?]:
90
[0], given: 0
|
D uses "only" which seems a bit extreme. Surely there are other reasons to hold an interview (introductions, formalities, or even to administer exams.)
(C) looks like the best choice. If interviewers lack these skills then the argument crumbles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 410
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
C it is ...
The statement says that interviews are a way to eliminate job applicants who personalities are unsuited.. hence the assumption is that the interviewers can actually identify such traits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Mar 2006
Posts: 349
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
Straight C, no purpose in the interview if they can't determine who is unsuitable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 01 Apr 2006
Posts: 185
Location: Toronto, Canada
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
Yes, the OA is C...
Now, could someone explain to me why "A" would be wrong? Out of scope?
Thanks,
jjhko
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1356
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
17
[0], given: 0
|
C make sense. if an interview doesnot do the job mentioned in (C), it is worthless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 444
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 0
|
(C) is straight. If the author's argument is to be valid, then there should a way by which interviewers can figure out (during the interview) which candidates are unsuited for the job.
If not, the interview's ability to eliminate unsuited candidates does not hold good.
_________________
http://mba2010dreams.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2934
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
37
[0], given: 0
|
Straight C without any doubt.
_________________
SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 499
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 0
|
C for sure...
A is out of scope because it is claiming without a doubt that a hiring program will be successful if it includes interviews. On the GMAT, an inference question should never be so extreme.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 718
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 0
|
Straight C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|