|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 55
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
) Ideally, groups focused on environmental justice should be [#permalink]
04 Nov 2010, 04:13
Question Stats:
64% (01:50) correct
35% (00:51) wrong based on 1 sessions
1.) Ideally, groups focused on environmental justice should be concerned with how new government projects will impact local populations. Specifically whether the projects would pose an unjust burden for lower-income and minority communities. • will impact local populations. Specifically whether the projects would pose an unjust burden • will impact local populations, specifically whether the projects would pose an unjust burden • will impact local populations and pose an unjust burden • will impact local populations and, specifically, pose an unjust burden • will be impacting local populations and posing an unjust burden The correct answer is B. My Doubt is b\w Doubt B\w B & D .. B = usage of comma leads to run on sentence but in D = 2 verbs are combined with correct parallelism. Also use of adverb specifically modifies verb pose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 1971
Location: India
Followers: 129
Kudos [?]:
664
[0], given: 170
|
Re: need help in SC to sort out doubt ?? [#permalink]
04 Nov 2010, 05:16
First point, a run - on occurs when you try to join a phrase with the main sentence with punctuation other than a comma such s period, semicolon or colon. A is a run - on but B is not, since it uses the comma. Second, - And -is a co-ordinate conjunction its purpose is to join two equal things. In the exercise in front, the main issue is to find how new government projects will impact local populations; whether they specifically pose a burden is part of the main impact and not equal to the impact. Third, when you use the co-ordinate conjunction, it is justified to skip the subject, provided , you can use the same subject of the main clause, which incidentally in this case is – groups- If you insert the subject - groups – in the second part you can see the absurdity of leaving the subject to imagination. The correct subject of the second part is the – projects – and unless this subject is mentioned, then the choice suffers unclear expression; that is why D is not correct PS: May I request you not pre-empt the answer; we must get some good discussion before we know the answer.
_________________
” I truly believe in online learning, I have been a student in both an Ivy League school (brick and mortar) and in an online setting and I have learned 1,000 times more in an online setting. You do not have anyone there lecturing you and then you do the work, online you are made to do it all yourself. Amazing how different the results are. - Heather(a student)”
Alicia Helle, an online student at the UW, "Obtaining my degree online has been a blessing. With two small children, I am able to work when it is convenient for my family and me. I have nothing but positive comments and experiences from my time at UW-Stout.”
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 55
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
Re: need help in SC to sort out doubt ?? [#permalink]
04 Nov 2010, 07:53
Hi.. Daagh
in 3rd point - ur point is that if we put subject 'groups' after AND, then the subject doesn't fit correctly to give right meaning ??? .
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1756
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 50
Kudos [?]:
145
[0], given: 108
|
Re: need help in SC to sort out doubt ?? [#permalink]
10 Nov 2010, 16:49
+1 B
_________________
"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."
My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 262
Location: India
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 21
|
Re: ) Ideally, groups focused on environmental justice should be [#permalink]
27 May 2012, 20:23
guys, can you tell me why not D. the official ans explanation says it changes the meaning. Can you tell me how? Also in ans option B should you have a comma or a colon?
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 1971
Location: India
Followers: 129
Kudos [?]:
664
[1] , given: 170
|
Re: ) Ideally, groups focused on environmental justice should be [#permalink]
28 May 2012, 06:13
1
This post received KUDOS
Choices C, D and E change the meaning, why? The subject of the main sentence in all these cases is groups. However, the subject of subordinate clause is projects and the duty of this subject projects stops with affecting local population. Then what will be the subject of the second independent sentence - pose an unjust burden -? The first eligible contender is the subject of the main sentence namely groups. If we mean that groups pose a burden then it is total distortion of meaning. That is why they are suspect. There may be hot debates that the projects itself can legally stand as the subject of the second part. . In order to avoid this muddle, well, I think GMAT does require a more clear choice that re-mentions the projects as the subject of the second part and seals the debate once for all, in favor of B.
_________________
” I truly believe in online learning, I have been a student in both an Ivy League school (brick and mortar) and in an online setting and I have learned 1,000 times more in an online setting. You do not have anyone there lecturing you and then you do the work, online you are made to do it all yourself. Amazing how different the results are. - Heather(a student)”
Alicia Helle, an online student at the UW, "Obtaining my degree online has been a blessing. With two small children, I am able to work when it is convenient for my family and me. I have nothing but positive comments and experiences from my time at UW-Stout.”
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2011
Posts: 225
Schools: Mccombs business school, Mays business school, Rotman Business School,
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 18
|
Re: ) Ideally, groups focused on environmental justice should be [#permalink]
10 Jun 2012, 22:50
what is the source of this question. i didnt find any OG SC in which 02 sentences are separated by full stop like this SC.
_________________
some people are successful, because they have been fortunate enough and some people earn success, because they have been determined.....
please press kudos if you like my post.... i am begging for kudos...lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 311
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.7
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 66
|
Re: ) Ideally, groups focused on environmental justice should be [#permalink]
18 Feb 2013, 12:16
daagh wrote: Choices C, D and E change the meaning, why? The subject of the main sentence in all these cases is groups. However, the subject of subordinate clause is projects and the duty of this subject projects stops with affecting local population. Then what will be the subject of the second independent sentence - pose an unjust burden -? The first eligible contender is the subject of the main sentence namely groups. If we mean that groups pose a burden then it is total distortion of meaning. That is why they are suspect. There may be hot debates that the projects itself can legally stand as the subject of the second part. . In order to avoid this muddle, well, I think GMAT does require a more clear choice that re-mentions the projects as the subject of the second part and seals the debate once for all, in favor of B. On second thoughts , I don't see "groups" as a subject of the fragment. Ideally, groups focused on environmental justice should be concerned with how new government projects will impact local populations. Specifically whether the projects would pose an unjust burden for lower-income and minority Ideally, groups focused on environmental justice should be concerned with how new government projects will impact local populations and pose an unjust burden for lower-income and minority It would have been correct if the "would" in the original wasn't present. Plz correct me if I am wrong !!!
_________________
Plz Correct me if I am deviating somewhere!! Consider KUDOS if the post was informative!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: ) Ideally, groups focused on environmental justice should be
[#permalink]
18 Feb 2013, 12:16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar Topics:
|
|
|
|
Ideally, the professional career diplomat should help in the
|
syamee_u |
6 |
07 Jul 2004, 03:24 |
|
|
|
In 1987, an environmental action group reported a 65-percent
|
venksune |
5 |
19 Sep 2004, 13:31 |
|
|
|
Ideally, scientific laws should display the virtues of
|
gmataquaguy |
9 |
24 May 2005, 18:13 |
|
|
|
In 1987, an environmental action group reported a 65-percent
|
rahulraao |
7 |
11 Sep 2005, 05:00 |
|
|
|
IN 1987, an environmental action group reported a 65-percent
|
paddler123 |
7 |
03 Aug 2008, 16:01 |
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|