Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: inequality problem [#permalink]
10 Jun 2009, 09:47

1

This post received KUDOS

Given:

mv<pv<0 ---- (1)

Asking

v<0?

Looking at (1) mv and pv are both less than zero. This means either m & p are positive and v is negative or m & p are negative and v is positive.

Lets look at statement 1.

It tells us m<p we also know that mv<pv from (1). The only way we can get m<p is by dividing both sides by v, however we do not change the inequality sign if the number or variable we are dividing by is positive. Hence if we divide both sides by v when v is positive we get m<p. Hence statement 1 is sufficient to tell us that v is not less than 0.

Lets look at statement 2. It tells us m<0 i.e. m is negative. If m is negative then p is also negative. And if m & p are negative than v has to be positive from (1) Hence v is not less than 0. Statement 2 is sufficient.

Hello everyone! Researching, networking, and understanding the “feel” for a school are all part of the essential journey to a top MBA. Wouldn’t it be great... ...

As part of our focus on MBA applications next week, which includes a live QA for readers on Thursday with admissions expert Chioma Isiadinso, we asked our bloggers to...

Booth allows you flexibility to communicate in whatever way you see fit. That means you can write yet another boring admissions essay or get creative and submit a poem...