Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 03 May 2015, 20:49

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# On Allocation

Author Message
CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 3281
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 449 [1] , given: 0

On Allocation [#permalink]  10 Aug 2010, 21:12
1
KUDOS
One of the interesting things that I have seen since re-visiting the forum is the continuing importance of the classic question of how to allocate schools to different clusters; an issue that seems particuarly salient at the Elite level. As some of you may remember, one of the goals of the cluster system was to move away from the self-imposed scarcity that seemed to hinder some applicants. By seeing that there are schools of broadly similar reputation/perceived quality, applicants would hopefully broaden their perspective to include at least those schools in a given cluster and perhaps the adjoining clusters. My assertion was not that these schools were literally interchangeable, but that they were similar in some meaningful ways. There was also an aspect of asset class assignment here, that students could in some sense construct a more nearly optimal portfolio of applicants by diversifying across clusters.

As usual, I appreciate the value of the dialogue regarding which school belongs where. Since these reputation league tables are essentially social constructs, it is useful to get a sense of the collective wisdom with respect to where a given school will be slotted. However, this is a also the risk of this degenerating into an angels on the head of a pin style question that misses the broader and grander point. It is crucial to remember that firms hire people, not resumes. In the vast majority of cases, the differences in perceived quality between two schools of similar reputation will reduce to a rounding error compared to the importance of the full set of attributes that the individual brings a prospective employer. Such crucial aspects as prior work experience, industry knowledge, personality, confidence, etc. will likely have far more impact on the outcome job candidacy than the location of a given school a certain cluster and an adjoining one.
_________________
On Allocation   [#permalink] 10 Aug 2010, 21:12
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150 8 02 Jan 2008, 03:19 At the beginning of the year, the city allocated$150 8 02 Oct 2006, 07:03
At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150 6 26 Oct 2005, 06:48 At the beginning of the year, the city allocated$150 4 20 Sep 2005, 12:45
At the beginning of the year, the city allocated \$150 2 03 Jun 2005, 15:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by