Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 28 Aug 2016, 17:18

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Parallel Structure - Doubt

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 335
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 530 [0], given: 136

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2013, 07:10
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Hi Experts,

Request you to please share your thoughts on the below two sentences.

1) They contended that the committee was biased and that it should be disbanded.

2) They contended that the committee was biased and it should be disbanded.

Just wanted to make sure, if we can remove "that" from the second sentence without any ambiguity. Please explain. I have seen official questions following the same sentence structure.

Thanks
Himanshu
_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Director
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 854
Followers: 82

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 61

Re: Parallel Structure - Doubt [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2013, 07:17
Quote:
1) They contended that the committee was biased and that it should be disbanded.

this is perfect

Quote:
2) They contended that the committee was biased and it should be disbanded.

this is outright wrong
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 335
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 530 [0], given: 136

Re: Parallel Structure - Doubt [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2013, 07:42
Quote:
this is outright wrong

Would like to know ..Why, it is wrong?

Moreover, adding an excerpt by Stacey Koprince of MGMAT - this is what she says about the below sentence-
Quote:

I think that X and that Y.
I think that the GMAT is hard and that I should study a lot.

In the example I just gave, the sentence is so short that we could probably get away with "I think that the GMAT is hard and I should study a lot." When the sentence is really copmlex though (like the one we did above), then the presence of the word "that" at the beginning of both X and Y makes it very clear to me what X and Y are - and I might not be able to figure that out otherwise.

Thanks
H
_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Director
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 854
Followers: 82

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 61

Re: Parallel Structure - Doubt [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2013, 08:09
Quote:
They contended that the committee was biased and it should be disbanded.

the reason why it is wrong is because it is missing logical parallelism. parallelism is of two types :structural and logical .while this sentence it structurally parallel but logically it is trying to connect two weird and independent ideas !! this is not acceptable
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1984
Followers: 1946

Kudos [?]: 6440 [0], given: 260

Re: Parallel Structure - Doubt [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2013, 14:25
imhimanshu wrote:
Hi Experts,

Request you to please share your thoughts on the below two sentences.

1) They contended that the committee was biased and that it should be disbanded.

2) They contended that the committee was biased and it should be disbanded.

Just wanted to make sure, if we can remove "that" from the second sentence without any ambiguity. Please explain. I have seen official questions following the same sentence structure.

Thanks
Himanshu

Himanshu,
Good question. IMO, we should retain the "that" to establish the parallelism clearly. So I would write sentence 1) instead of 2). However, that being said, if you have seen constructions similar to 2) in official questions, then you should bring those up here so that we have a much closer look at them and justify the same on solid grounds. So I look forward to seeing the official questions that prompted this question.
Thanks,
Payal
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 335
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 530 [0], given: 136

Re: Parallel Structure - Doubt [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Apr 2013, 05:42
egmat wrote:
Himanshu,
Good question. IMO, we should retain the "that" to establish the parallelism clearly. So I would write sentence 1) instead of 2). However, that being said, if you have seen constructions similar to 2) in official questions, then you should bring those up here so that we have a much closer look at them and justify the same on solid grounds. So I look forward to seeing the official questions that prompted this question.
Thanks,
Payal

Thanks Payal, I'l get back to you with the Official Question.
_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Re: Parallel Structure - Doubt   [#permalink] 02 Apr 2013, 05:42
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Doubt in comparison and parallel concept 4 09 May 2015, 07:02
doubts from Ron's video on parallelism 1 09 Nov 2012, 19:20
Parallelism Doubt 0 28 Oct 2012, 04:41
adverbs in parallel structure? 0 16 Dec 2011, 11:15
1 Parallel structure question 3 07 Oct 2011, 08:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by