Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 29 Aug 2016, 21:13

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 10 Jul 2011
Posts: 115
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2011, 09:15
I have just started working on the AWA piece and below was my first real attempt. It would be great if somebody could rate my response below. Thanks is advance.

Question:

“According to a recent study, professional bodybuilders who used Train & Gain, a new protein supplement, over the course of three months experienced an increase in measured strength of up to 20%. Since Train & Gain is now available without prescription at all major pharmacies, superior results are no longer limited to professional athletes. Try Train & Gain today and you too can boost your strength and achieve professional-level performance in just a few months.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. Point out flaws in the argument's logic and analyze the argument's underlying assumptions. In addition, evaluate how supporting evidence is used and what evidence might counter the argument's conclusion. You may also discuss what additional evidence could be used to strengthen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound.

The advertisement says that the protein supplement helped in increasing professional bodybuilders' measured strength by 20% in 3 months. It then contends that the supplement can now be used by the general public to booth their strength and achieve professional-level performnace within a few months.

The argument assumnes that the supplemnet will have similar effect among the non-professional users as it had among the professional bodybuilders. This is the most serious flaw in the logic. The supplement might have varying effects on various type of users which the argument fails to point out.

Moreover, the study used as an evidence to support the argument does not explicitly say that the increase in strength was because of the supplement, there might have been several factors such as increased amount of exercise contributing to the increase in the strength.

Further, the argument assumes that the professional level performance can be achieved by having more strength. While strength might be one of the criteria to achieve professional level performance, it might not be the only criteria to do so. There might be other factors such as skill to achieve that. The argument fails to point this out.

A further analysis of the study might reveal that the supplemt had actually a very small conribution towards increasing the strength among the professional-bodybuilders sighted in the argument.

A study among the non-professional users clearly indicating the effects of the supplemt will be the useful in supporting the argument.
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Please rate this AWA. (FIRST AWA) 0 23 Feb 2016, 05:48
1 Please rate my AWA 2 12 Aug 2012, 19:05
Please Rate my AWA 1 26 Nov 2010, 01:00
1 Please rate my AWAs 0 14 Oct 2010, 07:01
Please rate my AWAs...... 1 27 Sep 2010, 23:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by