Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 04 May 2016, 11:02

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Rotman vs Schulich

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 17 Apr 2012
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Apr 2012, 14:23
I have recently been accepted to Schulich and I am waiting on Rotman. Does anyone think the $30k premium between Rotman and Schulich is justified? Manager Joined: 04 Aug 2011 Posts: 137 Location: Canada Schools: York University (Schulich) - Class of 2015 GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41 GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42 WE: Engineering (Education) Followers: 5 Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 10 Re: Rotman vs Schulich [#permalink] ### Show Tags 24 Apr 2012, 13:51 Hell no, why would you wanna pay more for a lower ranked school? http://poetsandquants.com/2011/12/22/in ... -london/3/ Intern Joined: 17 Apr 2012 Posts: 8 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0 Re: Rotman vs Schulich [#permalink] ### Show Tags 24 Apr 2012, 16:55 But why is every ranking different. Some place Rotman above Schulich, some place Schulich above Rotman. I am a Finance guy. It is my understanding that Rotman is a much better school specifically for finance. However what I am really wondering is weather the$30k is money well spent? Or can I get the same role out of Schulich if I work a little harder.
Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2011
Posts: 137
Schools: York University (Schulich) - Class of 2015
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
WE: Engineering (Education)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

24 Apr 2012, 18:49
DrewF wrote:
But why is every ranking different. Some place Rotman above Schulich, some place Schulich above Rotman. I am a Finance guy. It is my understanding that Rotman is a much better school specifically for finance. However what I am really wondering is weather the \$30k is money well spent? Or can I get the same role out of Schulich if I work a little harder.

If you look closely, Rotman is not even ranked in 2/4 major international rankings while Schulich is ranked on all 4. Of the rankings that they are both on, Rotman and Schulich has approximately similar rankings. At best, Rotman is viewed as equivalent to Schulich and at worst, they're not in the same league.

Personally, I don't think the finance gap is all that big between the two and until someone can prove that the difference justify paying 30k for, I'm going with the cheaper and higher ranked of the two schools.
Intern
Joined: 17 Apr 2012
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2012, 14:08
But it seems specifically for Finance all the job prospects in toronto go to Rotman. So I don't understand what these rankings are based on.
Intern
Joined: 17 Apr 2012
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2012, 14:09
http://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/userfiles ... Report.pdf

http://www.schulich.yorku.ca/client/sch ... Survey.pdf

look at the job reports between the two schools. Although they both place in Finance look at the difference in Capital Markets roles
Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2011
Posts: 137
Schools: York University (Schulich) - Class of 2015
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
WE: Engineering (Education)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2012, 14:48
Hmm, not sure if I'm looking at the right place but the only difference I see is that Schulich's average and median salary is 10k higher than Rotman in finance. Their % placement is identical at 33% each.
Intern
Joined: 17 Apr 2012
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2012, 14:51
look specifically at the where in finance ppl get placed. Not the salaries...more specifically equity research, sales and trading and IB and even rotational programs.
Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2011
Posts: 137
Schools: York University (Schulich) - Class of 2015
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
WE: Engineering (Education)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2012, 15:12
I wouldn't worry too much about it unless that's the only thing that you want to do after graduating. Keep in mind that Schulich was about 2x the size of Rotman so the absolute number placed by each school is much closer than the %. Also with Rotman expanding their size by 33% I have a feeling their % would drop as the absolute number for placement remains the same. That's my take on it anyway.

Keep in mind that Schulich has a stronger incoming student body with higher GMAT and stronger outgoing grads with higher salary. This combines with lower costs and stronger international rep when compared to Rotman makes Schulich an attractive choice for me.
Intern
Joined: 15 Jan 2011
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

07 May 2012, 04:10
All I can say, I would choose Schulich over anyone else any day. Outstanding value proposition, I dont know where the comments about slacker students are coming from. Also, nice to see the absence of "we are like Harvard" because our dean and half of faculty from there or because we adopted their teaching method. Schulich is distinct with unique value proposition and clearly defined strategy of becoming a global business school.
Intern
Joined: 15 Jan 2011
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

07 May 2012, 13:00
I don’t think I am getting defensive, I’m just stating MY opinion and it’s my opinion only. As for not putting too much weight on the students comment...why not? I certainly know more about the school than you do because I go there. I bet if a student was praising Rotman you wouldn’t make such a comment. About the teaching method from Harvard, I was taking a shot at Ivey not Rotman. Nor did I ever imply that faculty from Harvard is bad. What I was getting at, is that they try to leverage Harvard's brand to help their own. However, in doing so, you acknowledge that you are inferior and playing a catch-up. Also questions the credibility of their own branding strategy.

Unlike you, I respect all Canadian schools, and no matter where one chooses to go, I think it’s a great decision to pursue MBA. My experience at Schulich was absolutely great despite what you want to think.
Re: Rotman vs Schulich   [#permalink] 07 May 2012, 13:00
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Rotman MBA vs. Schulich IMBA 3 28 Dec 2010, 01:01
Another Rotman vs Schulich thread 2 30 May 2013, 17:02
18 Queen's MBA vs. Rotman MBA vs. Schulich MBA 22 09 Feb 2012, 08:48
1 Rotman, Ivey, or Schulich? 4 12 May 2011, 14:16
3 Rotman Vs. Schulich 14 05 Mar 2010, 00:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by