Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 17 Sep 2014, 03:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

BoldFace12

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 1

Premium Member CAT Tests
BoldFace12 [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2008, 18:12
12. Astronomer: Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter’s atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were. Nevertheless, some indication of their size can be inferred from spectrographic analyses of Jupiter’s outer atmosphere. After the fragments’ entry, these analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur. The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter’s outer atmosphere does contain sulfur. Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter’s outer atmosphere without being burned up.

In the astronomer’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

F. The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the truth of that claim.
G. The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second provides evidence in support of the truth of that claim.
H. The first and the second are each considerations advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument.
I. The first provides evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
J. The first is a circumstance for which the astronomer seeks to provide an explanation; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the explanation provided by the astronomer.

I lost somewhere!
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 244
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: BoldFace12 [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2008, 18:29
sondenso wrote:
12. Astronomer: Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter’s atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were. Nevertheless, some indication of their size can be inferred from spectrographic analyses of Jupiter’s outer atmosphere. After the fragments’ entry, these analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur. The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter’s outer atmosphere does contain sulfur. Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter’s outer atmosphere without being burned up.

In the astronomer’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

F. The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the truth of that claim.
G. The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second provides evidence in support of the truth of that claim.
H. The first and the second are each considerations advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument.
I. The first provides evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
J. The first is a circumstance for which the astronomer seeks to provide an explanation; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the explanation provided by the astronomer.

I lost somewhere!


Choice is between G and H.

For G, The first boldface is ok, but the second does not entirely tie with the first. The second boldface is not really the evidence, but something of an explanation that the astronomer is trying to build towards the final conclusion.

I would go with H as the both the boldfaces both provide information that culminates in the conclusion that "that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter’s outer atmosphere without being burned up"

Last edited by Sunny143 on 05 Jun 2008, 18:46, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 950
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: BoldFace12 [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2008, 18:37
Premise1: Astronomer: Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter’s atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were.
Conclusion: Nevertheless, some indication of their size can be inferred from spectrographic analyses of Jupiter’s outer atmosphere.
Premise2: After the fragments’ entry, these analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur.
Premise3: The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter’s outer atmosphere does contain sulfur.
Premise4 (This also acts as an sub-conclusion): Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter’s outer atmosphere without being burned up.

First one does seem to be a claim that astronomers seeks to be true to F, and G is out.
H. The first and the second are each considerations advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument.
Seems OK to me.
I. The first provides evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
First supports the main conclusion not the sub conclusion.
J. The first is a circumstance for which the astronomer seeks to provide an explanation; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the explanation provided by the astronomer.
Second one is not consideration against astronomer. It is supporting it.

So I will go with H
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 244
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: BoldFace12 [#permalink] New post 07 Jun 2008, 16:51
Wats the OA?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 244
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: BoldFace12 [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2008, 20:38
knock knock....wats the OA buddy?
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 1

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: BoldFace12 [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2008, 23:30
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 384
Location: Azerbaijan
Concentration: Finance
Schools: HEC '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 73

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: BoldFace12 [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2011, 08:48
imho the answ is C.
all bold texts are just considerations, that are need to make a conclusion about the size of fragments
_________________

Happy are those who dream dreams and are ready to pay the price to make them come true

Re: BoldFace12   [#permalink] 27 Sep 2011, 08:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

BoldFace12

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.