|
Author |
Message |
|
Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2011
Posts: 201
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GPA: 2.99
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
24
[0], given: 66
|
Gerund vs Present Participle [#permalink]
31 Dec 2011, 12:08
Whats the difference between a Gerund and a Present Participle? THey both have the "-ing" form. Any help woud be appreciated!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 12 Sep 2011
Posts: 901
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
Followers: 95
Kudos [?]:
474
[2] , given: 114
|
Re: Gerund vs Present Participle [#permalink]
31 Dec 2011, 12:12
2
This post received KUDOS
I'm not a grammar expert, but here's an explanation online: http://www.englishforums.com/English/Ge ... r/post.htmAlso, remember, the GMAT will never tes you on the names or types of grammar. I'd say 99% of the people taking the GMAT don't know the different between a Gerund and a Present Participle. Buuuut, if this will help you with your studies, and help you get questions right, then by all means, learn about it! Good luck
_________________
New to the GMAT Club? <START HERE>
My GMAT and BSchool Tips:
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 15 Dec 2011
Posts: 174
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39 GMAT 2: Q V
GPA: 3.9
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
27
[0], given: 6
|
Re: Gerund vs Present Participle [#permalink]
31 Dec 2011, 16:28
Gerunds replaces a noun in a sentence while participle phrases are verbal phrases.
How do you form participle phrases:
Present participle phrase: Take a progressive sentence and remove the subject and first element of the verb out of it: What is left is a participle phrase. The participle phrase can act as adverb or an adjective, depending upon whether you use it as non-restrictive modifier or a restrictive modifier.
For example: Sentence: Cat is sitting on the desk. Cat was eating bread.
To create a participle phrase out of this, remove "Cat + is" and what you are left with is a participle phrase: Sitting on the desk, Cat was eating bread. Here the phrase acts as an adverb. It specifies "when and where".
Now if you have many cats sitting on the desk and you want to identify the unique cat, you can add the same participle phrase as an adjective to narrow down the cat.
Cat sitting on the desk was eating bread. In this sentence the participle phrase acts as an adjective. It narrows down 'which cat'.
To be continued.............
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 15 Dec 2011
Posts: 174
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39 GMAT 2: Q V
GPA: 3.9
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
27
[1] , given: 6
|
Re: Gerund vs Present Participle [#permalink]
31 Dec 2011, 16:54
1
This post received KUDOS
Past participles are formed out of passive sentences, but they too can act as adverb or adjective, i.e. the same as present participles.
Here you have two sentences: Soldier killed the intruders. Intruders had guns.
Turn the first sentence into passive: Soldier killed the intruders into :- Intruders were killed by the soldier.
Now remove the subject and the form of "be". The verb "be" has 8 forms: is, am, are, was, were, be, been, being.
so you are left with "killed by the soldier".
Tag it into the second sentence: Intruders had guns.
You get: Intruders killed by the soldier had guns.
BTW: The past participle phrase acts as adjective in the above sentence.
To be continued........
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2011
Posts: 201
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GPA: 2.99
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
24
[0], given: 66
|
Re: Gerund vs Present Participle [#permalink]
31 Dec 2011, 23:49
@GMATLA THanks for the link on the Dicussion it makes some sense. @Someone79 I am sorry I do not understand your definition. There is a lot of terminology that does not make sense to me. Could you please present an easier example of both. I look forward to your reply!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 11 May 2009
Posts: 126
Schools: Columbia Business School, Goizueta, Sloan
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
0
[1] , given: 28
|
Re: Gerund vs Present Participle [#permalink]
01 Jan 2012, 15:07
1
This post received KUDOS
gmatpunjabi, it might be easier if you said exactly what is not clear to you. To throw in some of my help, I will first explain about what someone79 meant by saying restrictive and non-restrictive modifier. You can also call them essential and non-essential modifier. Modifier is a phrase or clause that changes/describes a noun. Modifier can be essential or non-essential An essential modifier is a phrase or clause of the sentence that describes a noun and is crucial part of the sentence because without essential modifier you cannot understand the sentence. A non-essential modifier is a phrase or clause that describes a noun but if you removed it from the sentence you would still be able to understand the sentence. Adjective is something that describes a noun or pronoun. Example: Beautiful cat - the adjective is word beautiful. Adverb is something that describes a verb. Example: He beautifully painted that canvas - the adverb is beautifully. Note that adjective and adverbs are also considered modifiers. Did this help you a little bit?
_________________
Set your aims high, carpe diem
Last edited by Lolcat33 on 03 Jan 2012, 02:22, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2011
Posts: 201
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GPA: 2.99
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
24
[0], given: 66
|
Re: Gerund vs Present Participle [#permalink]
02 Jan 2012, 15:04
The thing I do not understand what a Past and Past Participle Phrase is. Thank you for the explanation about the essential/nonessential modifier that makes a lot more sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 11 May 2009
Posts: 126
Schools: Columbia Business School, Goizueta, Sloan
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
0
[1] , given: 28
|
Re: Gerund vs Present Participle [#permalink]
03 Jan 2012, 02:50
1
This post received KUDOS
You mean Present and Past Participle phrase? Before I try to explain it to you I have to tell you that I edited my previous post. I am bringing this up in order to make sure you are not confused. In my edited sentence, I initially wrote "essential modifier is a noun of phrase..." and corrected it to" essential modifier is a noun or phrase..." The mistake is obvious, you have probably noticed already by yourself. I just want to make sure that I did not provide you with a bad advice. Anyway, as far as the participles are concerned it is really not that hard. Someone97 provided you with an example, so I am going to use his in order to help. He wrote this: Cat is sitting on the desk. Cat was eating bread. First of all, notice that these are two sentences, with two subjects and two verbs. Now, the whole thing behind participle phrases (in the second example) that is probably making you confused is that they are not verbs but actually act as adjectives. Why? Because they describe nouns. Check out the second example. Cat sitting on the desk was eating bread. First, the subject is "Cat" Second, the verb is "was eating" Third, but kind of unnecessary to mention, "bread" is an object. so what is "sitting on the desk"? It is a present participle phrase because it modifies (describes) the "Cat". Someone79 said that this sentence helps you single out a particular cat. Imagine if you had a cat on the floor, a cat on the TV, a cat on the sofa etc. Now you say, cat sitting on the desk was eating bread, and you know exactly which cat ate bread. It is of the essence that you do not confuse present participle phrases with gerund. They are easy to confuse because they end with -ing form. You just need to know that gerund behaves as a noun, and present participle phrase (as well as past participle phrase) behaves as an adjective.
_________________
Set your aims high, carpe diem
|
|
|
|
|
|
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1090
Followers: 539
Kudos [?]:
1137
[3] , given: 131
|
Re: Gerund vs Present Participle [#permalink]
09 Jan 2012, 13:27
3
This post received KUDOS
More often than not, people do get confused between gerund and present participle. It is because they both have the same form – verb+ing. However, they do have a difference. GERUND: A gerund is formed by adding ‘ing’ to a verb. Essentially, gerunds function as nouns. They do denote an action but act as a noun in the sentence. For example: Swimming is my favorite hobby. Here, “Swimming” certainly denotes an action but it functions as a noun in this sentence, acting as a subject. PRESENT PARTICPLE: They are also formed using ‘ing’ with the verb. However, present participles in a sentence act either like an adverb or an adjective. At e-gmat, we call them verb-ing modifiers. They either modify the verbs or the nouns in the sentence. For example: The rising sun has inspired my photographers and painters. Here “rising” is modifying the noun “sun”, hence acting like an adjective. Now let’s take these two sentences: 1. Asking questions is no crime. 2. Asking the same question again and again, Bob kept disturbing the class. In sentence 1, “Asking” is a gerund. It denotes an action but is a noun in the sentence that acts like a verb. In sentence 2, “asking” is a verb-ing modifier because it is referring to the verb “kept disturbing”. How did Bob keep disturbing the class? He did so sy asking same question again and again. Here “asking the same question again and again” is working like an adverb and hence is a verb-ing modifier. Hope this helps. Shraddha
_________________
Free trial:Click here to start free trial (100+ free practice questions) Free Session (June 22): : Learn how to define your GMAT strategy, create your study plan and master the core skills to excel on the GMAT. Click here to attend.
  
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2011
Posts: 201
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GPA: 2.99
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
24
[0], given: 66
|
Re: Gerund vs Present Participle [#permalink]
10 Jan 2012, 17:34
That clears up everything Thank You!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Posts: 10
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 2
|
Re: Gerund vs Present Participle [#permalink]
24 May 2013, 23:43
Hi egmat, You provided a very nice explanation... +1 to you... Could you please also explain the C option in terms of gerund and participles. The Baldrick Manufacturing Company has for several years followed a policy aimed at decreasing operating costs and improving the efficiency of its distribution system. (A) aimed at decreasing operating costs and improving (B) aimed at the decreasing of operating costs and to improve (C) aiming at the decreasing of operating costs and improving (D) the aim of which is the decreasing of operating costs and improving (E) with the aim to decrease operating costs and to improve In option C, OG says that "Using the before decreasing creates a gerund, which is not parallel to the participle improving. Can you please explain how and why.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Gerund vs Present Participle
[#permalink]
24 May 2013, 23:43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Vercules, Zarrolou, Legendaddy, noboru, Marcab, metallicafan, rajeevrks27, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, souvik101990, doe007, MacFauz, PTK, carcass, kissthegmat
|