Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
In a certain sequence the difference between the (N-1)th [#permalink]
22 Feb 2007, 20:55
3
This post was BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
75% (hard)
Question Stats:
59% (02:47) correct
41% (01:49) wrong based on 115 sessions
In a certain sequence the difference between the (N-1)th and Nth element equals the Nth element (N is any positive integer). What is the fourth element of this sequence?
(1) The first element of the sequence is 1. (2) The third element of the sequence is 1/4.
If you know the rule that connects two consecutive numbers in a sequence and if you are given also a number in that sequence you can easily figure out any other member of this sequence. Basic algebra ;)
If you know the rule that connects two consecutive numbers in a sequence and if you are given also a number in that sequence you can easily figure out any other member of this sequence. Basic algebra
Is this correct? Can someone confirm? This could save us some time in DS questions.
In a certain sequence the difference between the (N-1)th [#permalink]
19 Jun 2010, 12:48
1
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
JoyLibs wrote:
ppetkov wrote:
If you know the rule that connects two consecutive numbers in a sequence and if you are given also a number in that sequence you can easily figure out any other member of this sequence. Basic algebra
Is this correct? Can someone confirm? This could save us some time in DS questions.
Yes it's correct.
For arithmetic (or geometric) progression if you know:
- any particular two terms, - any particular term and common difference (common ratio), - the sum of the sequence and either any term or common difference (common ratio),
then you will be able to calculate any missing value of given sequence. _________________
Here is another sequence question I could use some help on. I guess the answer correctly, but I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around sequence questions.
In a certain sequence the difference between the (N-1)th and Nth element equals the Nth element (N is any positive integer). What is the fourth element of this sequence?
1. The first element of the sequence is 1. 2. The third element of the sequence is 1/4.
There is no information of total number of terms.
\(T_{N-1} - T_{N} =T_{N}\)
\(T_{N-1} = T_{N} +T_{N}\)
\(T_{N-1} = 2*T_{N}\)
1. The first element is 1
=> \(T_1 = 2* T_2\) => \(T_1 = 2^2 * T_3\) => \(T_1 = 2^3 * T_4\) Since T_1 is given, this is sufficient.
2. \(T_3 = 1/4\) using same reason above this is also sufficient.
Hence D
Moreover \(T_{N-1} = 2*T_{N}\) represents GP series with ratio =1/2. We only need to know the value of any term to find the whole series. _________________
Good try (I had not thought the solution could be the second sequence too)
BUT I see you missed a stated fact N is a positive number.This fact rejects your second sequence ( 0 is neither + or -ve)
mujimania wrote:
Please correct me if I'm wrong, the answers appears to be A. Option 2 by itself seems to be insufficient as it can lead to one of two sequences:
i) 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125 In this sequence the fourth term is 0.125
ii) 0, 0, 0.25, 0.5 Here the fourth term is 0.5
Can anyone check whether my calculations are correct or not. Thanks
Why does N being a positive number mean that the sequence consists of positive numbers? Isn't n just the index? Or should the statement have been a_n is positive? Also when it says the difference between an and an-1, people have used an-1 - an = an
what about an - an-1 = an => in which case an-1 would be 0 and that situation is perhaps avoided by saying an is positive? _________________
Good try (I had not thought the solution could be the second sequence too)
BUT I see you missed a stated fact N is a positive number.This fact rejects your second sequence ( 0 is neither + or -ve)
mujimania wrote:
Please correct me if I'm wrong, the answers appears to be A. Option 2 by itself seems to be insufficient as it can lead to one of two sequences:
i) 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125 In this sequence the fourth term is 0.125
ii) 0, 0, 0.25, 0.5 Here the fourth term is 0.5
Can anyone check whether my calculations are correct or not. Thanks
Why does N being a positive number mean that the sequence consists of positive numbers? Isn't n just the index? Or should the statement have been a_n is positive? Also when it says the difference between an and an-1, people have used an-1 - an = an
what about an - an-1 = an => in which case an-1 would be 0 and that situation is perhaps avoided by saying an is positive?
if \(a_{n-1} = 0\) => the whole sequence is 0.....but when you will use the statements, the value of terms are non-zero hence you \(a_{n-1} = 0\) is not true. _________________
I have a distinct feeling that the original question clearly ruled out an = 0, that is was not saying N is positive (as posted here).. But now that brings up an interesting question - can the stem conflict with the statements? In other words do we have to take the statements to be true?
There was another example where the statements were not needed to answer the question, just the stem was enough.. xy<yz<0.. _________________
I have a distinct feeling that the original question clearly ruled out an = 0, that is was not saying N is positive (as posted here).. But now that brings up an interesting question - can the stem conflict with the statements? In other words do we have to take the statements to be true?
There was another example where the statements were not needed to answer the question, just the stem was enough.. xy<yz<0..
I dont think in gmat you will get such questions..... _________________
If you know the rule that connects two consecutive numbers in a sequence and if you are given also a number in that sequence you can easily figure out any other member of this sequence. Basic algebra
Is this correct? Can someone confirm? This could save us some time in DS questions.
Yes it's correct.
For arithmetic (or geometric) progression if you know:
- any particular two terms, - any particular term and common difference (common ratio), - any particular term and the formula for n_th term, - the sum of the sequence and either any term or common difference (common ratio),
then you will be able to calculate any missing value of given sequence.
Wow, that is very important information. Thank you Bunuel.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, the answers appears to be A. Option 2 by itself seems to be insufficient as it can lead to one of two sequences:
i) 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125 In this sequence the fourth term is 0.125
ii) 0, 0, 0.25, 0.5 Here the fourth term is 0.5
Can anyone check whether my calculations are correct or not. Thanks
It is given in the question that t(n-1) - t(n) = t(n), so t(n) = t(n-1)/2 Every subsequent term should be half of the previous term. Statement II does not lead to 0, 0, 0.25, 0.5 since the difference between 3rd and 4th terms is 0.25 which should be equal to the fourth term but it is not. The fourth term is 0.5 here. It only leads to the first sequence and hence statement II alone is sufficient.
Statements never ever contradict the data of the question stem or each other for that matter. They only provide additional information or repeat what we already have. _________________
Re: In a certain sequence the difference between the (N-1)th [#permalink]
27 Jan 2015, 03:53
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________
As I’m halfway through my second year now, graduation is now rapidly approaching. I’ve neglected this blog in the last year, mainly because I felt I didn’...
Perhaps known best for its men’s basketball team – winners of five national championships, including last year’s – Duke University is also home to an elite full-time MBA...
Hilary Term has only started and we can feel the heat already. The two weeks have been packed with activities and submissions, giving a peek into what will follow...