Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 Sep 2014, 13:47

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

inference

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1102
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 125 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
inference [#permalink] New post 06 Jan 2008, 02:30
That the application of new technology can increase the productivity of existing coal mines is demonstrated by the case of Tribnia’s coal industry. Coal output per miner in Tribnia is double what it was five years ago, even though no new mines have opened.
Which of the following can be properly concluded from the statement about coal output per miner in the passage?


A. If the number of miners working in Tribnian coal mines has remained constant in the past five years, Tribnia’s total coal production has doubled in that period of time.
B. Any individual Tribnian coal mine that achieved an increase in overall output in the past five years has also experienced an increase in output per miner.
C. If any new coal mines had opened in Tribnia in the past five years, then the increase in output per miner would have been even greater than it actually was.
D. If any individual Tribnian coal mine has not increased its output per miner in the past five years, then that mine’s overall output has declined or remained constant.
E. In Tribnia the cost of producing a given quantity of coal has declined over the past five years.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 284 [0], given: 1

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: inference [#permalink] New post 06 Jan 2008, 21:02
marcodonzelli wrote:
That the application of new technology can increase the productivity of existing coal mines is demonstrated by the case of Tribnia’s coal industry. Coal output per miner in Tribnia is double what it was five years ago, even though no new mines have opened.
Which of the following can be properly concluded from the statement about coal output per miner in the passage?


A. If the number of miners working in Tribnian coal mines has remained constant in the past five years, Tribnia’s total coal production has doubled in that period of time.
B. Any individual Tribnian coal mine that achieved an increase in overall output in the past five years has also experienced an increase in output per miner.
C. If any new coal mines had opened in Tribnia in the past five years, then the increase in output per miner would have been even greater than it actually was.
D. If any individual Tribnian coal mine has not increased its output per miner in the past five years, then that mine’s overall output has declined or remained constant.
E. In Tribnia the cost of producing a given quantity of coal has declined over the past five years.


C it is

Coal output per miner in Tribnia is double what it was five years ago, even though no new mines have opened.
So : If any new coal mines had opened in Tribnia in the past five years, then the increase in output per miner would have been even greater than it actually was. must be true
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2007
Posts: 80
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: inference [#permalink] New post 06 Jan 2008, 21:55
I take B, since there is no new coal mine open and output per miner was double. the only thing I can infer from those information is if a mine has increase output than its miner must also see an increase of output.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2593
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 189 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: inference [#permalink] New post 06 Jan 2008, 23:11
A.Haung wrote:
I take B, since there is no new coal mine open and output per miner was double. the only thing I can infer from those information is if a mine has increase output than its miner must also see an increase of output.


I said B as well. was btwn B and D. and thought B was a much better answer.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 767
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: inference [#permalink] New post 07 Jan 2008, 00:29
marcodonzelli wrote:
That the application of new technology can increase the productivity of existing coal mines is demonstrated by the case of Tribnia’s coal industry. Coal output per miner in Tribnia is double what it was five years ago, even though no new mines have opened.
Which of the following can be properly concluded from the statement about coal output per miner in the passage?


A. If the number of miners working in Tribnian coal mines has remained constant in the past five years, Tribnia’s total coal production has doubled in that period of time.
B. Any individual Tribnian coal mine that achieved an increase in overall output in the past five years has also experienced an increase in output per miner.
C. If any new coal mines had opened in Tribnia in the past five years, then the increase in output per miner would have been even greater than it actually was.
D. If any individual Tribnian coal mine has not increased its output per miner in the past five years, then that mine’s overall output has declined or remained constant.
E. In Tribnia the cost of producing a given quantity of coal has declined over the past five years.


I picked A.

The productivity could have increase in one of 2 ways: # of miners remained constant and total output increased or total output remained constant and # of miners decreased. 'A' tells us that the first scenario is true.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 99
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Re: inference [#permalink] New post 07 Jan 2008, 02:35
A it is

Lets go one by one

marcodonzelli wrote:
That the application of new technology can increase the productivity of existing coal mines is demonstrated by the case of Tribnia’s coal industry. Coal output per miner in Tribnia is double what it was five years ago, even though no new mines have opened.
Which of the following can be properly concluded from the statement about coal output per miner in the passage?


A. If the number of miners working in Tribnian coal mines has remained constant in the past five years, Tribnia’s total coal production has doubled in that period of time.
CORRECT
B. Any individual Tribnian coal mine that achieved an increase in overall output in the past five years has also experienced an increase in output per miner.

well no individual achievement.. We are talking about overall coal industry. It can very well possible that if say there were 10 mines, 7 of them had decline in coal output / miner but 3 of them significant increase so that the total coal output/ miner is doubled

C. If any new coal mines had opened in Tribnia in the past five years, then the increase in output per miner would have been even greater than it actually was.

Again, you can't say. it may have been a loss. we talking about industry as a whole here

D. If any individual Tribnian coal mine has not increased its output per miner in the past five years, then that mine’s overall output has declined or remained constant.

No. it can possible that his best buddy has done his, work his friend's work and the work of other two chaps, overall making a good profit

E. In Tribnia the cost of producing a given quantity of coal has declined over the past five years.

No talks about cost here.. Only output/miner...

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 652
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 190 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: inference [#permalink] New post 02 Aug 2008, 21:52
good explanation abhi, thank you.
_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

Re: inference   [#permalink] 02 Aug 2008, 21:52
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Inference Questions Elias123 1 15 Mar 2012, 13:06
Inference Questions camoor 2 25 Jun 2008, 19:30
Inference Questions el1981 2 03 May 2008, 15:51
Inference question Jamesk486 6 19 May 2007, 06:52
Inference Questions reshamad 2 27 Mar 2006, 17:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

inference

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.