GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Jul 2018, 21:10

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

inference

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1063
inference  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jan 2008, 03:30
That the application of new technology can increase the productivity of existing coal mines is demonstrated by the case of Tribnia’s coal industry. Coal output per miner in Tribnia is double what it was five years ago, even though no new mines have opened.
Which of the following can be properly concluded from the statement about coal output per miner in the passage?


A. If the number of miners working in Tribnian coal mines has remained constant in the past five years, Tribnia’s total coal production has doubled in that period of time.
B. Any individual Tribnian coal mine that achieved an increase in overall output in the past five years has also experienced an increase in output per miner.
C. If any new coal mines had opened in Tribnia in the past five years, then the increase in output per miner would have been even greater than it actually was.
D. If any individual Tribnian coal mine has not increased its output per miner in the past five years, then that mine’s overall output has declined or remained constant.
E. In Tribnia the cost of producing a given quantity of coal has declined over the past five years.

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1782
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
Re: inference  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jan 2008, 22:02
marcodonzelli wrote:
That the application of new technology can increase the productivity of existing coal mines is demonstrated by the case of Tribnia’s coal industry. Coal output per miner in Tribnia is double what it was five years ago, even though no new mines have opened.
Which of the following can be properly concluded from the statement about coal output per miner in the passage?


A. If the number of miners working in Tribnian coal mines has remained constant in the past five years, Tribnia’s total coal production has doubled in that period of time.
B. Any individual Tribnian coal mine that achieved an increase in overall output in the past five years has also experienced an increase in output per miner.
C. If any new coal mines had opened in Tribnia in the past five years, then the increase in output per miner would have been even greater than it actually was.
D. If any individual Tribnian coal mine has not increased its output per miner in the past five years, then that mine’s overall output has declined or remained constant.
E. In Tribnia the cost of producing a given quantity of coal has declined over the past five years.


C it is

Coal output per miner in Tribnia is double what it was five years ago, even though no new mines have opened.
So : If any new coal mines had opened in Tribnia in the past five years, then the increase in output per miner would have been even greater than it actually was. must be true
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2007
Posts: 76
Re: inference  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jan 2008, 22:55
I take B, since there is no new coal mine open and output per miner was double. the only thing I can infer from those information is if a mine has increase output than its miner must also see an increase of output.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2491
Re: inference  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2008, 00:11
A.Haung wrote:
I take B, since there is no new coal mine open and output per miner was double. the only thing I can infer from those information is if a mine has increase output than its miner must also see an increase of output.


I said B as well. was btwn B and D. and thought B was a much better answer.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 746
Re: inference  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2008, 01:29
marcodonzelli wrote:
That the application of new technology can increase the productivity of existing coal mines is demonstrated by the case of Tribnia’s coal industry. Coal output per miner in Tribnia is double what it was five years ago, even though no new mines have opened.
Which of the following can be properly concluded from the statement about coal output per miner in the passage?


A. If the number of miners working in Tribnian coal mines has remained constant in the past five years, Tribnia’s total coal production has doubled in that period of time.
B. Any individual Tribnian coal mine that achieved an increase in overall output in the past five years has also experienced an increase in output per miner.
C. If any new coal mines had opened in Tribnia in the past five years, then the increase in output per miner would have been even greater than it actually was.
D. If any individual Tribnian coal mine has not increased its output per miner in the past five years, then that mine’s overall output has declined or remained constant.
E. In Tribnia the cost of producing a given quantity of coal has declined over the past five years.


I picked A.

The productivity could have increase in one of 2 ways: # of miners remained constant and total output increased or total output remained constant and # of miners decreased. 'A' tells us that the first scenario is true.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 88
Re: inference  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2008, 03:35
A it is

Lets go one by one

marcodonzelli wrote:
That the application of new technology can increase the productivity of existing coal mines is demonstrated by the case of Tribnia’s coal industry. Coal output per miner in Tribnia is double what it was five years ago, even though no new mines have opened.
Which of the following can be properly concluded from the statement about coal output per miner in the passage?


A. If the number of miners working in Tribnian coal mines has remained constant in the past five years, Tribnia’s total coal production has doubled in that period of time.
CORRECT
B. Any individual Tribnian coal mine that achieved an increase in overall output in the past five years has also experienced an increase in output per miner.

well no individual achievement.. We are talking about overall coal industry. It can very well possible that if say there were 10 mines, 7 of them had decline in coal output / miner but 3 of them significant increase so that the total coal output/ miner is doubled

C. If any new coal mines had opened in Tribnia in the past five years, then the increase in output per miner would have been even greater than it actually was.

Again, you can't say. it may have been a loss. we talking about industry as a whole here

D. If any individual Tribnian coal mine has not increased its output per miner in the past five years, then that mine’s overall output has declined or remained constant.

No. it can possible that his best buddy has done his, work his friend's work and the work of other two chaps, overall making a good profit

E. In Tribnia the cost of producing a given quantity of coal has declined over the past five years.

No talks about cost here.. Only output/miner...

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 587
Re: inference  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2008, 22:52
good explanation abhi, thank you.

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

Re: inference &nbs [#permalink] 02 Aug 2008, 22:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

inference

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderator: chetan2u

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.