Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 04 May 2015, 04:10

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Negate Test

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 May 2009
Posts: 145
Concentration: Finance
GMAT Date: 12-16-2011
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 2

Negate Test [#permalink] New post 05 Jul 2010, 08:34
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 3 sessions
Can someone please explain the negate test if you are between two possible answers? Please provide examples if you could. Thanks.
2 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 153
Location: St. Louis, MO
Schools: Cornell (Bach. of Sci.), UCLA Anderson (MBA)
Followers: 134

Kudos [?]: 247 [2] , given: 6

Re: Negate Test [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2010, 08:12
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The negation test works on CR Assumption questions. Assumptions basically complete the argument (i.e. when verbalized, they become premises), and therefore they support the conclusion. On GMAT Assumption questions, it is common for several choices to support the argument, and often these choices all “sound good.” The trick is to sort out the truly necessary statement from the merely helpful statements.

Rather than being a supporting statement, the correct Assumption is a statement that’s opposite (negation) would kill the argument.

For example, here’s one from GMATPrep.
Attachment:
CR_18.JPG
CR_18.JPG [ 101.34 KiB | Viewed 3928 times ]

Notice the “on which the argument depends” language, not simply “what helps the argument?”

If we mistakenly look for answers that support, we might think the following:
(A) Supports: Large tranquilizer dose. Possible overdose? This does seem to indicate that the tranquilizer is a problem.
(B) Supports: If uncollared females have increasing fertility, then what else would explain the reduced fertility of the tranquilized/collared females? It would have to be the tranquilizer, the only other difference between the two groups.
(C) Supports: Rules out other factors involved in the tranquilizing, and allows us to conclude the reduced fertility is due to a substance in the tranquilizer.
(D) Supports (maybe): At least it suggests that female rhinos are tranquilized more frequently than males, and would be affected more by whatever substance is in the tranquilizer.
(E) Neutral: Just a fact about the tranquilizer.

You can see how unproductive this thought process is! The choices start to sound similar, and you could talk yourself into almost any one.

In contrast, if we negate each statement to see the effect on the conclusion (“some substance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility”), the correct answer stands out. I’ve put the negated idea/word(s) in caps.

(A) The tranquilizer dose is NOT large. No effect on the conclusion.
(B) The fertility rate of uncollared female rhinos has been STEADY or DECLINING. No effect on the conclusion.
(C) The stress of being tranquilized and handled DOES have a negative effect on fertility. This kills the conclusion that some substance in the tranquilizer is to blame.
(D) Male rhinos lose their collars AS FREQUENTLY as females. No effect on the conclusion.
(E) The tranquilizer used on the rhinos is DIFFERENT than that used on other large mammals. No effect on the conclusion.

The correct answer is C.
_________________


Emily Sledge | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | St. Louis

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 May 2009
Posts: 145
Concentration: Finance
GMAT Date: 12-16-2011
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 2

Re: Negate Test [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2010, 06:02
Thanks this was a lot of help. For assumption CR questions, is it beneficial to jump right to using the negate technique? The negate test doesn't work for any other type of CR question, correct?
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 153
Location: St. Louis, MO
Schools: Cornell (Bach. of Sci.), UCLA Anderson (MBA)
Followers: 134

Kudos [?]: 247 [0], given: 6

Re: Negate Test [#permalink] New post 08 Jul 2010, 04:59
Correct, it only applies to Assumption CR. The same thinking, but not the test itself, could be applied a bit to Weaken the Conclusion questions, on which the correct answer sometimes is the explicit negation of an assumption.

I don't use the test right away, but I don't think it would wrong to do so necessarily. I tend to read the argument and anticipate the needed Assumption, based on whether there is a logic gap, weak premise, etc. For me, that is faster. Only if debating between a couple decent-sounding answers do I use the negation test to decide.
_________________


Emily Sledge | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | St. Louis

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 994
Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: [color=#0000FF]Chicago Booth Class of 2015 [/color] - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Retail Banking)
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 481 [0], given: 36

CAT Tests
Re: Negate Test [#permalink] New post 08 Jul 2010, 12:10
790 8-) Thats an awesome score Emily !

:-D
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 553
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 88

Re: Negate Test [#permalink] New post 06 Oct 2011, 00:56
The book CRITICAL REASONING BIBLE develops the concept of SUPPORTER ASSUMPTION, and DEFENDER ASSUMPTION.
the application of this concept is not explained clearly. here I want to share with you some application.

Supporter assumption is easy to realize when you read answer choices. However, you can not realize defender assumption when you read answer choices. The only way to realize defender assumption is the negation test. negate each answer choice to find defender assumption. This process will take much more time and defender is normally a hard question.

the lesion is that when you finish reading 5 answer choices and see no assumption, it is defender assumption and you have to use negation test and longer time.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3806
Followers: 425

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Negate Test [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2014, 21:25
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 97
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 19

GMAT ToolKit User
Negate Test [#permalink] New post 13 Mar 2015, 18:45
esledge wrote:
The negation test works on CR Assumption questions. Assumptions basically complete the argument (i.e. when verbalized, they become premises), and therefore they support the conclusion. On GMAT Assumption questions, it is common for several choices to support the argument, and often these choices all “sound good.” The trick is to sort out the truly necessary statement from the merely helpful statements.

Rather than being a supporting statement, the correct Assumption is a statement that’s opposite (negation) would kill the argument.

For example, here’s one from GMATPrep.
Attachment:
CR_18.JPG

Notice the “on which the argument depends” language, not simply “what helps the argument?”

If we mistakenly look for answers that support, we might think the following:
(A) Supports: Large tranquilizer dose. Possible overdose? This does seem to indicate that the tranquilizer is a problem.
(B) Supports: If uncollared females have increasing fertility, then what else would explain the reduced fertility of the tranquilized/collared females? It would have to be the tranquilizer, the only other difference between the two groups.
(C) Supports: Rules out other factors involved in the tranquilizing, and allows us to conclude the reduced fertility is due to a substance in the tranquilizer.
(D) Supports (maybe): At least it suggests that female rhinos are tranquilized more frequently than males, and would be affected more by whatever substance is in the tranquilizer.
(E) Neutral: Just a fact about the tranquilizer.

You can see how unproductive this thought process is! The choices start to sound similar, and you could talk yourself into almost any one.

In contrast, if we negate each statement to see the effect on the conclusion (“some substance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility”), the correct answer stands out. I’ve put the negated idea/word(s) in caps.

(A) The tranquilizer dose is NOT large. No effect on the conclusion.
(B) The fertility rate of uncollared female rhinos has been STEADY or DECLINING. No effect on the conclusion.
(C) The stress of being tranquilized and handled DOES have a negative effect on fertility. This kills the conclusion that some substance in the tranquilizer is to blame.
(D) Male rhinos lose their collars AS FREQUENTLY as females. No effect on the conclusion.
(E) The tranquilizer used on the rhinos is DIFFERENT than that used on other large mammals. No effect on the conclusion.

The correct answer is C.




Hi Emily,
Good day.. I have a clarification here.. I understand that it's the the tranquilizers a reason for lowering fertility from C.. But doesn't B breaks the conclusion on negating as well? Because on negating B, we get that B) The fertility rate of uncollared female rhinos is declined. Which means that even the untranquilized ones are also getting negative effect on fertility. So tranqilizers are not the reason. There must be some other... Doesn't this pulls down the conclusion that darts are responsible for fertility decline? Please. Help...

Last edited by sheolokesh on 14 Mar 2015, 09:16, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2013
Posts: 163
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 55

Re: Negate Test [#permalink] New post 14 Mar 2015, 03:17
Hi Esledge,

I like your thought process for the below question. I like the negate the statement approach.

I am struggling with one bit... where exactly you negate a sentence for example...

'Sam goes to university in a bus along the riverside'

How do we negate the above sentence..

1. Sam does not go to uni

or

2. Sam does not go in a bus to Uni.

or

3. sam's bus does not go along rivver.


With many other negations coming up, I find it a bit hard to crack some CR question.

Please could you help me with negation approach.

esledge wrote:
The negation test works on CR Assumption questions. Assumptions basically complete the argument (i.e. when verbalized, they become premises), and therefore they support the conclusion. On GMAT Assumption questions, it is common for several choices to support the argument, and often these choices all “sound good.” The trick is to sort out the truly necessary statement from the merely helpful statements.

Rather than being a supporting statement, the correct Assumption is a statement that’s opposite (negation) would kill the argument.

For example, here’s one from GMATPrep.
Attachment:
CR_18.JPG

Notice the “on which the argument depends” language, not simply “what helps the argument?”

If we mistakenly look for answers that support, we might think the following:
(A) Supports: Large tranquilizer dose. Possible overdose? This does seem to indicate that the tranquilizer is a problem.
(B) Supports: If uncollared females have increasing fertility, then what else would explain the reduced fertility of the tranquilized/collared females? It would have to be the tranquilizer, the only other difference between the two groups.
(C) Supports: Rules out other factors involved in the tranquilizing, and allows us to conclude the reduced fertility is due to a substance in the tranquilizer.
(D) Supports (maybe): At least it suggests that female rhinos are tranquilized more frequently than males, and would be affected more by whatever substance is in the tranquilizer.
(E) Neutral: Just a fact about the tranquilizer.

You can see how unproductive this thought process is! The choices start to sound similar, and you could talk yourself into almost any one.

In contrast, if we negate each statement to see the effect on the conclusion (“some substance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility”), the correct answer stands out. I’ve put the negated idea/word(s) in caps.

(A) The tranquilizer dose is NOT large. No effect on the conclusion.
(B) The fertility rate of uncollared female rhinos has been STEADY or DECLINING. No effect on the conclusion.
(C) The stress of being tranquilized and handled DOES have a negative effect on fertility. This kills the conclusion that some substance in the tranquilizer is to blame.
(D) Male rhinos lose their collars AS FREQUENTLY as females. No effect on the conclusion.
(E) The tranquilizer used on the rhinos is DIFFERENT than that used on other large mammals. No effect on the conclusion.

The correct answer is C.

_________________

Kudos to you, for helping me with some KUDOS.

Re: Negate Test   [#permalink] 14 Mar 2015, 03:17
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Query on Negation Test by E-gmat fameatop 1 06 Apr 2013, 04:06
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Doubt in Assumption Negation Technique imhimanshu 3 21 Jul 2012, 06:44
Logical negation for many and most ?? gmatcracker24 2 16 Oct 2011, 21:52
Mispaced Negation ajay_gmat 0 17 Oct 2007, 10:57
Rule of negation rssread 1 05 Jul 2006, 06:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Negate Test

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.