Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 04:48 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 04:48
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
I3igDmsu
Joined: 25 May 2009
Last visit: 26 Jan 2015
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
688
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: Finance
GMAT Date: 12-16-2011
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
esledge
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Last visit: 05 Feb 2011
Posts: 144
Own Kudos:
1,559
 [11]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: St. Louis, MO
Schools:Cornell (Bach. of Sci.), UCLA Anderson (MBA)
Posts: 144
Kudos: 1,559
 [11]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
I3igDmsu
Joined: 25 May 2009
Last visit: 26 Jan 2015
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: Finance
GMAT Date: 12-16-2011
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
esledge
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Last visit: 05 Feb 2011
Posts: 144
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: St. Louis, MO
Schools:Cornell (Bach. of Sci.), UCLA Anderson (MBA)
Posts: 144
Kudos: 1,559
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Correct, it only applies to Assumption CR. The same thinking, but not the test itself, could be applied a bit to Weaken the Conclusion questions, on which the correct answer sometimes is the explicit negation of an assumption.

I don't use the test right away, but I don't think it would wrong to do so necessarily. I tend to read the argument and anticipate the needed Assumption, based on whether there is a logic gap, weak premise, etc. For me, that is faster. Only if debating between a couple decent-sounding answers do I use the negation test to decide.
User avatar
nusmavrik
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Last visit: 03 Apr 2022
Posts: 467
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
Posts: 467
Kudos: 2,635
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
790 8-) Thats an awesome score Emily !

:-D
User avatar
thangvietname
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Last visit: 28 Jun 2017
Posts: 522
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 916
Posts: 522
Kudos: 561
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The book CRITICAL REASONING BIBLE develops the concept of SUPPORTER ASSUMPTION, and DEFENDER ASSUMPTION.
the application of this concept is not explained clearly. here I want to share with you some application.

Supporter assumption is easy to realize when you read answer choices. However, you can not realize defender assumption when you read answer choices. The only way to realize defender assumption is the negation test. negate each answer choice to find defender assumption. This process will take much more time and defender is normally a hard question.

the lesion is that when you finish reading 5 answer choices and see no assumption, it is defender assumption and you have to use negation test and longer time.
avatar
sheolokesh
Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Last visit: 06 Jun 2015
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 51
Kudos: 56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
esledge
The negation test works on CR Assumption questions. Assumptions basically complete the argument (i.e. when verbalized, they become premises), and therefore they support the conclusion. On GMAT Assumption questions, it is common for several choices to support the argument, and often these choices all “sound good.” The trick is to sort out the truly necessary statement from the merely helpful statements.

Rather than being a supporting statement, the correct Assumption is a statement that’s opposite (negation) would kill the argument.

For example, here’s one from GMATPrep.
Attachment:
CR_18.JPG
Notice the “on which the argument depends” language, not simply “what helps the argument?”

If we mistakenly look for answers that support, we might think the following:
(A) Supports: Large tranquilizer dose. Possible overdose? This does seem to indicate that the tranquilizer is a problem.
(B) Supports: If uncollared females have increasing fertility, then what else would explain the reduced fertility of the tranquilized/collared females? It would have to be the tranquilizer, the only other difference between the two groups.
(C) Supports: Rules out other factors involved in the tranquilizing, and allows us to conclude the reduced fertility is due to a substance in the tranquilizer.
(D) Supports (maybe): At least it suggests that female rhinos are tranquilized more frequently than males, and would be affected more by whatever substance is in the tranquilizer.
(E) Neutral: Just a fact about the tranquilizer.

You can see how unproductive this thought process is! The choices start to sound similar, and you could talk yourself into almost any one.

In contrast, if we negate each statement to see the effect on the conclusion (“some substance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility”), the correct answer stands out. I’ve put the negated idea/word(s) in caps.

(A) The tranquilizer dose is NOT large. No effect on the conclusion.
(B) The fertility rate of uncollared female rhinos has been STEADY or DECLINING. No effect on the conclusion.
(C) The stress of being tranquilized and handled DOES have a negative effect on fertility. This kills the conclusion that some substance in the tranquilizer is to blame.
(D) Male rhinos lose their collars AS FREQUENTLY as females. No effect on the conclusion.
(E) The tranquilizer used on the rhinos is DIFFERENT than that used on other large mammals. No effect on the conclusion.

The correct answer is C.



Hi Emily,
Good day.. I have a clarification here.. I understand that it's the the tranquilizers a reason for lowering fertility from C.. But doesn't B breaks the conclusion on negating as well? Because on negating B, we get that B) The fertility rate of uncollared female rhinos is declined. Which means that even the untranquilized ones are also getting negative effect on fertility. So tranqilizers are not the reason. There must be some other... Doesn't this pulls down the conclusion that darts are responsible for fertility decline? Please. Help...
avatar
shriramvelamuri
Joined: 27 Dec 2013
Last visit: 29 Jun 2016
Posts: 162
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 113
Posts: 162
Kudos: 137
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Esledge,

I like your thought process for the below question. I like the negate the statement approach.

I am struggling with one bit... where exactly you negate a sentence for example...

'Sam goes to university in a bus along the riverside'

How do we negate the above sentence..

1. Sam does not go to uni

or

2. Sam does not go in a bus to Uni.

or

3. sam's bus does not go along rivver.


With many other negations coming up, I find it a bit hard to crack some CR question.

Please could you help me with negation approach.

esledge
The negation test works on CR Assumption questions. Assumptions basically complete the argument (i.e. when verbalized, they become premises), and therefore they support the conclusion. On GMAT Assumption questions, it is common for several choices to support the argument, and often these choices all “sound good.” The trick is to sort out the truly necessary statement from the merely helpful statements.

Rather than being a supporting statement, the correct Assumption is a statement that’s opposite (negation) would kill the argument.

For example, here’s one from GMATPrep.
Attachment:
CR_18.JPG
Notice the “on which the argument depends” language, not simply “what helps the argument?”

If we mistakenly look for answers that support, we might think the following:
(A) Supports: Large tranquilizer dose. Possible overdose? This does seem to indicate that the tranquilizer is a problem.
(B) Supports: If uncollared females have increasing fertility, then what else would explain the reduced fertility of the tranquilized/collared females? It would have to be the tranquilizer, the only other difference between the two groups.
(C) Supports: Rules out other factors involved in the tranquilizing, and allows us to conclude the reduced fertility is due to a substance in the tranquilizer.
(D) Supports (maybe): At least it suggests that female rhinos are tranquilized more frequently than males, and would be affected more by whatever substance is in the tranquilizer.
(E) Neutral: Just a fact about the tranquilizer.

You can see how unproductive this thought process is! The choices start to sound similar, and you could talk yourself into almost any one.

In contrast, if we negate each statement to see the effect on the conclusion (“some substance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility”), the correct answer stands out. I’ve put the negated idea/word(s) in caps.

(A) The tranquilizer dose is NOT large. No effect on the conclusion.
(B) The fertility rate of uncollared female rhinos has been STEADY or DECLINING. No effect on the conclusion.
(C) The stress of being tranquilized and handled DOES have a negative effect on fertility. This kills the conclusion that some substance in the tranquilizer is to blame.
(D) Male rhinos lose their collars AS FREQUENTLY as females. No effect on the conclusion.
(E) The tranquilizer used on the rhinos is DIFFERENT than that used on other large mammals. No effect on the conclusion.

The correct answer is C.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,832
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,832
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
188 posts
Current Student
710 posts
Current Student
275 posts