tehcalvin
pbodine
Good question. I looked into it, and actually Financial Times -- which does rank U.S. and non-U.S. programs together -- ranks Queen's 87th! Business Week ranks it No. 1 among non-U.S. schools so we have a discrepancy here.
Paul,
I wonder what should applicants do in case of such a discrepancy. Other rankings (WSJ, for example) focus on region-wise rankings and specifically on US schools.
One ranking system rates the program as #1 among non-US schools (above INSEAD and LBS), and the other rates it as #87 in the combined ranking (if you take out all the US schools in FT ranking, still the program will stand at 20+ position).
There are multiple factors that each ranking system focuses on - but a huge discrepancy in the
overall ranking is confusing for applicants.
Would you have any information on where Queen's MBA stands in terms of its reputation in the North American region? What about when compared to other schools like Richard Ivey (which is now a 1-year program) and Rotman?
Thanks
tehcalvin,
When faced with such a discrepancy, applicants should discard rankings and look at the specific ways in which the school will or will not address their learning and post-MBA goals. What kinds of companies recruit at the school? Is the school strong in your area of specialization? What is the employment rate of its MBAs and their average starting salary versus other schools?
According to Financial Times, whose rankings (along with U.S. News's) I trust the most, York, Rotman, Ivey, McGill, and UBC Sauder are all stronger schools than Queen's. I have no reason to doubt their estimate, but I recommend you begin answering the kinds of questions I posed above when determining whether Queen's is right for you. The answers to them can all be found in Business Week's school data section.
Good luck,