Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Jul 2014, 23:00

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Please evaluate this argument

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Jun 2012
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 8

Please evaluate this argument [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2012, 23:25
The following appeared in a memorandum issued by a large city’s council on the arts:
“In a recent citywide poll, 15 percent more residents said that they watch television programs about the visual arts
than was the case in a poll conducted five years ago. During these past five years, the number of people visiting our
city’s art museums has increased by a similar percentage. Since the corporate funding that supports public television,
where most of the visual arts programs appear, is now being threatened with severe cuts, we can expect that
attendance at our city’s art museums will also start to decrease. Thus some of the city’s funds for supporting the arts
should be reallocated to public television.”

Given argument states that there was a 15% increase in no.of residents who were watching visual arts programs and also in no.of visitors to city's art museums. Further, argument attributes this increase to corportate funding of public television, where most of the visual art programs appear. As, corporate funding for public television is decreasing, argument concludes that city's council should allocate funds for supporting the arts to public television.
This argument has below flaws:
1. Attributing increase in visitors to city's art musuems to increase in viewereship of televison programs. And there is no evidence that this increase in viewership is in public television.
2. There is no concrete evidence that increase in no.of visitors to city's art museums is purely because of more no.of city's residents visiting the museums

First, argument states that there is a 15% increase in televsion viewereship of visual arts programs. However, argument faisl to give evidence wherther this increase is in viewership of programs that are aired on public television. Further more, argument relates increase in attendance at city's art museums to increase in viewership of these programs. But, argument fails to give nformation related to programs i.e. whether tv programs are related to city's art museums . If such information is given, then it is easy to correlate increase in viewership to city's art museums.

Second, argument states that there is a 15% increase in attendance at city's art museums. But, argument has not given statistics pertainign to art musuem vistiors. It is difficult to ascertain whether visitors are city residents or tourists. If this increase is because of more tourists visiting the musuems, then city council's proposal to relocate funds to public television will not yield the results as it anticipated. Also, it the increase is purey because of city residents, then survey results woudl ascertain whether city residents are prompted to visit musuesm because of public television programs or some other information that they have received.

Hence, to conlude this argument is flawed and more detaisl information would substantiate city's council proposal to divert funds for supporting arts to public television.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2012
Posts: 310
Location: India
GMAT 1: 610 Q49 V23
GMAT 2: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V47
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 159 [0], given: 141

Re: Please evaluate this argument [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2012, 23:43
Use paragraphs instead of bullet points. Check the below link - it is of great help.

how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.html
_________________

"Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well."
― Voltaire


Press Kudos, if I have helped.
Thanks!

shit-happens-my-journey-to-172475.html#p1372807

Re: Please evaluate this argument   [#permalink] 28 Sep 2012, 23:43
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Please Evaluate (Argument) rockroars 4 08 Dec 2010, 14:29
Please help to evaluate Analysis of Argument chetanb 1 15 Aug 2010, 23:18
Please evaluate my AWA - Argument NishaTG 2 05 Jul 2010, 16:38
Please evaluate my argument mojorising800 0 18 Jan 2010, 13:33
please evaluate my argument ISBtarget 0 21 Nov 2009, 11:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Please evaluate this argument

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.