Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Sep 2014, 00:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2009
Posts: 15
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 3

Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2009, 08:37
1
This post received
KUDOS
E it is...where is the OA?
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 238
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 88 [2] , given: 25

GMAT Tests User
Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 05 Nov 2009, 03:20
2
This post received
KUDOS
IMO D

E only mentions that they were susceptible and not actual contraction of infections caused by the debris
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 May 2012
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an [#permalink] New post 15 May 2012, 01:41
10km,it's really large one,what a loss that i haven't seen that.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2012
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 1

Re: Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an [#permalink] New post 16 May 2012, 00:29
Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an asteroid struck what is now the Yucatan Peninsula, thereby causing extinction of the dinosaurs. These scientists have established that such a strike could have hurled enough debris into the atmosphere to block sunlight and cool the atmosphere. Without adequate sunlight, food sources for herbivorous dinosaurs would have disappeared, and no dinosaurs could have survived a prolonged period of low temperatures. These same scientists, however, have also established that most debris launched by the asteroid would have settled to the ground within six months, too soon for the plants to disappear or the dinosaurs to freeze.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy between the scientists’ beliefs and the scientists’ results, as described above?
(A) Loss of the herbivorous dinosaurs would have deprived the carnivorous dinosaurs of their food source.
(B) Dinosaurs inhabited most landmasses on the planet but were not especially abundant in the area of the asteroid strike.
(C) A cloud of debris capable of diminishing sunlight by 20 percent would have cooled the earth’s surface by 7 to 10 degrees Celsius.
(D) The asteroid was at least 9.6 km in diameter, large enough for many dinosaurs to be killed by the strike itself and by subsequent tidal waves.
(E) Dinosaurs were susceptible to fatal respiratory problems cause by contamination of the air by asteroid debris.

E....

the paradox between the belief and the result is what needs to be resolved....

the belief is that the asteroid debris blocked sunlight resulting in a loss of vegetation and thereby extinction of dinosaurs.... and the result is that asteroid debris never blocked sunlight because the debris settled within six months of the collision event....

A. blocked sunlight and subsequent vegetation loss led to B. extinction (not true as explained in the argument)

which would mean that

A. (something else) led to B. extinction...

only E seems to offer an alternative explanation....

A. ok... but does not explain extinction.. only says the food chain got disrupted...
B. straightforward reject..
C. too many numbers (7 to 10 degree celsius) that are useless in explaining extinction
D. of course the asteroid may be large enough to kill "many" dinosaurs but does that necessarily mean extinction?
E. relates how the asteroid debris would have caused extinction.... asteroid debris -> air contamination -> "fatal" respiratory problems -> WIPEOUT....
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Feb 2012
Posts: 25
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: WBS '15
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.36
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 7

Re: Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an [#permalink] New post 16 May 2012, 00:35
E makes sence to me, cannot be anything else
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Posts: 117
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V23
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 15

Re: Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an [#permalink] New post 16 May 2012, 10:04
noboru wrote:
Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an asteroid struck what is now the Yucatan Peninsula, thereby causing extinction of the dinosaurs. These scientists have established that such a strike could have hurled enough debris into the atmosphere to block sunlight and cool the atmosphere. Without adequate sunlight, food sources for herbivorous dinosaurs would have disappeared, and no dinosaurs could have survived a prolonged period of low temperatures. These same scientists, however, have also established that most debris launched by the asteroid would have settled to the ground within six months, too soon for the plants to disappear or the dinosaurs to freeze.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy between the scientists’ beliefs and the scientists’ results, as described above?
(A) Loss of the herbivorous dinosaurs would have deprived the carnivorous dinosaurs of their food source.
(B) Dinosaurs inhabited most landmasses on the planet but were not especially abundant in the area of the asteroid strike.
(C) A cloud of debris capable of diminishing sunlight by 20 percent would have cooled the earth’s surface by 7 to 10 degrees Celsius.
(D) The asteroid was at least 9.6 km in diameter, large enough for many dinosaurs to be killed by the strike itself and by subsequent tidal waves.
(E) Dinosaurs were susceptible to fatal respiratory problems cause by contamination of the air by asteroid debris.



+1 for E.
D is not correct because it states many dinosaurs and not all dinosaurs.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Posts: 238
Location: Hyderabad
WE 1: 4.6 years Exp IT prof
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 38

Re: Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an [#permalink] New post 16 May 2012, 11:17
My Answer E
OA please!!??!!
_________________

I will give a Fight till the End

"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."
- Bernard Edmonds

A person who is afraid of Failure can never succeed -- Amneet Padda

Don't Forget to give the KUDOS

Current Student
User avatar
Status: mba here i come!
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 271
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: Insead '13 (M)
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT 2: Q V
Followers: 24

Kudos [?]: 700 [0], given: 48

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: dinosaurs [#permalink] New post 17 Jun 2012, 08:39
noboru wrote:
(D) The asteroid was at least 9.6 km in diameter, large enough for many dinosaurs to be killed by the strike itself and by subsequent tidal waves.
(E) Dinosaurs were susceptible to fatal respiratory problems cause by contamination of the air by asteroid debris.

Could u explain bit further why you see D irrelevant?
Thanks

d) killing many dinosaurs isn't enough. why did all die then?
e) fatal respiratory problems for 6 months sounds like a valid reason for extinction.
_________________

press +1 Kudos to appreciate posts
Download Valuable Collection of Percentage Questions (PS/DS)

Re: dinosaurs   [#permalink] 17 Jun 2012, 08:39
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
20 Experts publish their posts in the topic Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists, elevinty 30 22 May 2010, 22:27
Sixty Five Millions Years Ago,according to some nitindas 7 17 Aug 2009, 00:11
Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists, quiet888 3 04 May 2008, 17:21
1 Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists, tarek99 5 26 Jan 2008, 09:10
Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists, misterJJ2u 2 03 Jul 2007, 08:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some scientists believe that 65 million years ago an

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 28 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.