The current move to patent computer programs is a move in : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 10 Dec 2016, 18:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The current move to patent computer programs is a move in

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Affiliations: PMI, ASQ
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 118
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Followers: 185

Kudos [?]: 1111 [0], given: 21

The current move to patent computer programs is a move in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2013, 14:40
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

50% (02:41) correct 50% (01:49) wrong based on 339 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The current move to patent computer programs is a move in the wrong direction and should be stopped. The patent system was originally designed solely to protect small-time inventors from exploitation, not to give large corporations control over a methodology. Any computer program is merely the implementation of a methodology.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Computer programs should be developed not only by large corporations but by small-time inventors as well.
(B) Implementing a methodology always requires less creative effort than does true invention.
(C) The issue of whether or not to patent computer programs presents the patent system with problems that have never before arisen.
(D) Large corporations should not hold patents for implementations of methodologies.
(E) Small-time inventors who support the move to patent computer programs act contrary to their own best interests.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Legendary Collections
1. 700 Level Quant 2. IIM Quant 3. 100 CR from LSAT 4. 100 Legendary SC 5. 5000 Practice problems 6.125 Quant 7. 38 SC 8. 10 Full Length GMAT Pen&Paper Tests
9. 1500+ RC 10. 100 Legendary CR 11. Additional Verbal Qs 12. Additional Quant Qs

My debrief |Free essay review initiative
PM me for One-on-One Webex Tutoring

If you have any questions
New!
Intern
Joined: 03 Apr 2012
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 4

Re: The current move to patent computer programs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2013, 00:34
The current move to patent computer programs is a move in the wrong direction and should be stopped. The patent system was originally designed solely to protect small-time inventors from exploitation, not to give large corporations control over a methodology. Any computer program is merely the implementation of a methodology.

(D) Large corporations should not hold patents for implementations of methodologies. Correct

1)computer program is the implementation of a methodology.
2)Large corp should not be given control over a methodology.

Option D correctly extends this view to implementation of methodology.
Intern
Joined: 28 Nov 2012
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 3

Re: The current move to patent computer programs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2013, 15:44
This one felt trickier than it should have, I got it right but I took 2 min. Answer D felt too simple but the other choices felt like you were hiking through mud, lots of garbage. What's the source of this?
Senior Manager
Status: Final Lap
Joined: 25 Oct 2012
Posts: 287
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.54
WE: Project Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 285 [0], given: 85

Re: The current move to patent computer programs [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jan 2013, 02:37
skiingforthewknds wrote:
This one felt trickier than it should have, I got it right but I took 2 min. Answer D felt too simple but the other choices felt like you were hiking through mud, lots of garbage. What's the source of this?

I also got it right in 1.26 but i wasn't convinced at all, i was more intuitive than thinking even if i'm quite good at this type of question using the technique of negation. And this is what makes finding the correct answer harsh and difficult where the stem is quite simple.
_________________

KUDOS is the good manner to help the entire community.

Manager
Joined: 25 Oct 2013
Posts: 173
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 56

Re: The current move to patent computer programs is a move in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2014, 04:38
This is an assumption question, however D seems to be restating the purpose of a patent which is given in the argument itself. Then will it be an assumption? B on the other hand gives an assumption for this sentence in the argument. "Any computer program is merely the implementation of a methodology."

Any thoughts?
_________________

Click on Kudos if you liked the post!

Practice makes Perfect.

GMAT Tutor
Joined: 20 Jul 2012
Posts: 25
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V50
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 2 [1] , given: 4

Re: The current move to patent computer programs is a move in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2014, 09:21
1
KUDOS
The current move to patent computer programs is a move in the wrong direction and should be stopped. The patent system was originally designed solely to protect small-time inventors from exploitation, not to give large corporations control over a methodology. Any computer program is merely the implementation of a methodology.

(D) Large corporations should not hold patents for implementations of methodologies.

This is a good example of what I call the "vanilla question" or to quote Homer Simpson the "D'oh!" question. The hardest assumption questions are the ones where the assumptions are so basic you don't even recognize that you are assuming it! It is the assumption that underlies everything else. Use the negation technique to identify. If that assumption is wrong then all the other answers are rendered moot.

Conclusion: The current move to patent computer programs is a move in the wrong direction and should be stopped.

Premises: 1) The patent system was originally designed to protect small investors from exploitation
2) the patent system was not designed to give corporations control over a methodology.
3) any computer program is merely the implementation of a methodology

Assumption: a basic implicit understanding : corporations shouldn't hold patents for implementations of methodologies.
_________________

WWW.CLEARMOUNTAINPREP.COM

Math Forum Moderator
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 2145
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 83

Kudos [?]: 568 [0], given: 311

Re: The current move to patent computer programs is a move in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2014, 09:48
The current move to patent computer programs is a move in the wrong direction and should be stopped. The patent system was originally designed solely to protect small-time inventors from exploitation, not to give large corporations control over a methodology. Any computer program is merely the implementation of a methodology.

Patenting Computer Programmes should be stopped since it is moving in the wrong direction.

Originally - Designed to protect small Investors.

Now - Exploited by Large Corporations over methodology.

Computer Program is merely implementation of methodology.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Computer programs should be developed not only by large corporations but by small-time inventors as well.

Irrelevant.

(B) Implementing a methodology always requires less creative effort than does true invention.

Out of scope.

(C) The issue of whether or not to patent computer programs presents the patent system with problems that have never before arisen.

Out of scope and Irrelevant.

(D) Large corporations should not hold patents for implementations of methodologies.

True , if Large Companies hold Patents for Implementation of methodology then it will not foster fair competition.

(E) Small-time inventors who support the move to patent computer programs act contrary to their own best interests.

Not at all true , but are trying to protect their own best Interest...

IMO (D)
_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10444
Followers: 887

Kudos [?]: 192 [0], given: 0

Re: The current move to patent computer programs is a move in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2015, 18:36
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: The current move to patent computer programs is a move in   [#permalink] 13 Jul 2015, 18:36
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Most employees in the computer industry move from company to 1 18 Oct 2012, 23:37
1 Most employees in the computer industry move from company to 4 11 Apr 2011, 17:42
17 Most employees in the computer industry move from company to 13 03 Oct 2009, 21:11
2 Most employees in the computer industry move from company to 9 05 Mar 2008, 15:27
Most employees in the computer industry move from company to 13 07 Jun 2007, 06:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by