Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 00:22 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 00:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,148
 [22]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
19
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
778,148
 [6]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,148
 [6]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
RiaDe
Joined: 04 Jan 2022
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 96
Posts: 3
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
janney2023
Joined: 03 Nov 2023
Last visit: 07 Nov 2023
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I guess the reason why E is not right is because the law passing can also be a law only heavily restricting the genetically modified crops.
User avatar
kyanawut
Joined: 02 Nov 2021
Last visit: 21 Dec 2023
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
5
 [2]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Accounting
GPA: 3.75
WE:Accounting (Education)
Posts: 2
Kudos: 5
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It's very tricky.

I think E is incorrect because the government's actions can be things other than laws. So, E is too narrow for specifying the condition.

C may be a good choice because it just flips the stated part from the question.
Because of uncertainty from the government, farmers planting GMOs crops are at risk. --> They will not be good if the government bans the GMOs.
On the other hand, farmers planting traditional crops are at risk too. --> They lose productivity, compared to the farmer with GMO crops if the government has no actions.
User avatar
VivekSri
Joined: 01 May 2022
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 468
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 117
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Posts: 468
Kudos: 721
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi @Bunuel, or any Verbal Expert, can anyone explains why A is not the answer? How come C is the answer?
User avatar
kayarat600
Joined: 16 Oct 2024
Last visit: 11 Nov 2025
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 87
Posts: 75
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Bunuel
Many farmers have begun to switch from traditional crops to genetically-modified crops, which help to increase yield and protect against potential loss from disease or insect infestation. In doing so, however, these farmers take a large risk: at any point, the government could ban or heavily restrict these genetically-modified crops, rendering an entire year’s work useless.

Which of the following can be inferred from the information above?

A. It is riskier for a farmer to grow genetically-modified crops than to grow traditional crops.

B. The government should consider the impact that a law against genetically-modified crops would have on farmers.

C. Farmers who grow traditional crops are taking a risk in doing so.

D. It is unwise for farmers to switch from traditional crops to genetically-modified crops.

E. Unless a law is passed banning genetically-modified crops, farmers are better-served by growing genetically-modified crops than by growing traditional crops.





VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:



This Inference question uses the classic testmaker device of misdirection. Remember: in an Inference question the correct answer MUST BE TRUE. So while the author's purpose in writing this paragraph may be to highlight the risks inherent in switching from traditional crops to to genetically-modified crops, the answer choices consistent with that theme go just a bit too far to be provable:

(A) Can you really prove that genetically-modified crops are riskier to grow than traditional crops? You know from the stimulus that genetically-modified crops help to eliminate the risks from disease and insect infestation: could those risks inherent with traditional crops be larger than the risk of a law banning genetic modification? Note also that the government could pass such a law, but the argument doesn't give a probability for how likely that is to happen. So this comparison isn't one that can be drawn without further information.

For the same reason (D) is incorrect. Is it provable that it's unwise to switch to genetically-modified crops when you don't even know which type of crop is riskier?

By the same logic, (E) - which goes the opposite direction and says that without a law banning genetically-modified crops it's a good idea to grow them instead of traditional crops - is also not necessarily true. You just don't know all those factors: what if, for example, genetically-modified crops become associated with health risks, or consumer sentiment otherwise turns against them and they don't sell for nearly the amount that traditional crops would? Or the costs associated with the genetic modification are higher than the increase in profits would be?

Choice (C) is correct, as it's something you can definitely prove: the fist sentence talks about two risks with traditional crops:

Modified crops "...protect against potential loss from disease or insect infestation." Potential loss is a risk, so choice (C) has definitive proof and is therefore correct. Alas, the testmaker misdirects you away from it by making the gist of the argument talk about the risks with the other type of crop - let this be a lesson that the "must be true" inference standard is the crux of Inference questions. The right answer must be true, but it need not be the main point of the paragraph.
Hi, thanks for the question, my problem with this answer is that no where is it mentioned in the passage that the traditional crops don't have these benefits maybe they aren't as pronounced but the passage doesn't explicitly mention that tradational crops lack this while the passage in general obviously seems to imply this it implies stuff for other options too.



To help illustrate my point I'll make a sentence, Rome started using swords instead of spear, renowned for their sharpness and ease of handling.

While this seems to imply that the sword is superior it just mention attributes and doesn't actually even mention that the spear lacks these qualities. I'll go even further here and say even if the spear is not as sharp how can we assume that using a spear just because it is not as sharp is a risk compared to using a sword this is imo not implied at all.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts