Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 01:15 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 01:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,170
Own Kudos:
10,416
 [61]
Given Kudos: 1,861
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Posts: 3,170
Kudos: 10,416
 [61]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
56
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,165
 [12]
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,170
Own Kudos:
10,416
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,861
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Posts: 3,170
Kudos: 10,416
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sayan640
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,179
Own Kudos:
813
 [1]
Given Kudos: 783
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Products:
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Posts: 1,179
Kudos: 813
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
HI gmatophobia,
Can you please provide your explanation for the 2nd statement in the same way that you explained the first statement ?

I think according to the second statement ,
135000<= S.P <= 139000
80,001 <= M.B <=84999
Hence , 215001<=  M.B +S.P <= 223,999

Hence , the combined population of San Pepe and Maple Beach = 220,000 (if rounded to nearest 10,000)

Please correct me if I am wrong .
gmatophobia

gmatophobia
Rounded to the nearest 10,000, the populations of San Pepe and of its suburb Maple Beach are 140,000 and 80,000, respectively. What is the combined population of San Pepe and Maple Beach, rounded to the nearest 10,000 ?

(1) The exact population figures of San Pepe and Maple Beach are each within 2% of the rounded figures above.

(2) The approximate population figure for San Pepe was rounded up, whereas the figure for Maple Beach was rounded down.

Attachment:
Screenshot 2024-01-13 112600.png
Sharing some thoughts on this question

Rounded to the nearest 10,000, the populations of San Pepe and of its suburb Maple Beach are 140,000 and 80,000

M.B ⇒ Maple Beach
S.P ⇒ San Pepe

Actual Population




  • \(135,000 \leq \text{S.P} < 145,000 \)
  • \(75,000 \leq \text{M.B} < 85,000 \)

Adding the above inequalities

\(135,000 + 75,000 \leq \text{S.P + M.B} < 145,000 + 85,000 \)

\(210,000 \leq \text{S.P + M.B} < 230,000 \)

Hence, the rounded population can be either 210,000; 220,000 ; or 230,000

As we are rounding to the nearest 10,000, the maximum possible difference between the actual value and the rounded value can be 5,000.

Statement 1

(1) The exact population figures of San Pepe and Maple Beach are each within 2% of the rounded figures above.




  • 2% of 140,000 = 2,800
  • 2% of 80,000 = 1,600

Actual Population




  • \(140,000 - 2,800 \leq \text{S.P} < 140,000 + 2,800 \)
  • \(80,000 - 1,600 \leq \text{M.B} < 80,000 + 1,600 \)

Adding the above inequalities

\(220,000 - 4,000 \leq \text{S.P + M.B} < 220,000 + 4,000 \)

As the difference is less than 5,000 the rounded value will be 220,000

The statement is sufficient to answer the question. Eliminate B, C, and E.

Statement 2

(2) The approximate population figure for San Pepe was rounded up, whereas the figure for Maple Beach was rounded down.

Inference about San Pepe:




  • As the population figure for San Pepe was rounded up, the actual population of San Pepe is less than or equal to the rounded population
  • The maximum difference between the actual population and the rounded population = -5000
    Note: We are indicating the difference as negative, as the actual population is less than the rounded population.

Inference about Maple Beach:




  • As the population figure for Maple Beach was rounded down, the actual population of Maple Beach is greater than or equal to the rounded population
  • The maximum difference between the actual population and the rounded population = +4999
    Note: We are indicating the difference as positive, as the actual population is greater than the rounded population.

When we add the two values, the maximum difference between the actual and the rounded population will not exceed 5000.

Greatest possible rounding difference = -5000 - 0 = -5000 ⇒ When the actual population of San Pepe is 135,000 and the population of Maple Beach is 80,000. The combined population of San Pepe and Maple Beach = 135,000 + 80,000 = 215,000

Least possible rounding difference = 0 - 0 = 0 ⇒ When the actual population of San Pepe is 140,000 and the population of Maple Beach is 80,000. The combined population of San Pepe and Maple Beach = 140,000 + 80,000 = 220,000

In both the above cases, the rounded population to the nearest 10,000 is 220,000.

Hence, this statement is also sufficient to answer the question.

Option D
­
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,170
Own Kudos:
10,416
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,861
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Posts: 3,170
Kudos: 10,416
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
sayan640
HI gmatophobia,
Can you please provide your explanation for the 2nd statement in the same way that you explained the first statement ?

I think according to the second statement ,
135000<= S.P <= 139000
80,001 <= M.B <=84999
Hence , 215001<=  M.B +S.P <= 223,999

Hence , the combined population of San Pepe and Maple Beach = 220,000 (if rounded to nearest 10,000)

Please correct me if I am wrong .
­
sayan640 - Yes, you are correct. However, a small correction,

\(135,000 \leq SP \leq 139,999\)
\(80,001 \leq MB \leq 84,999\)

\(215,001 \leq SP+MB \leq 224,998\)

Hence, the rounded population would always be 220,000
 ­
User avatar
Siagar
Joined: 29 Aug 2020
Last visit: 25 Apr 2025
Posts: 3
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­I dont understand where you got the maximum possible difference between the actual value and the rounded value can be 5,000?? How did you calculate that number??
User avatar
MalachiKeti
Joined: 01 Sep 2024
Last visit: 27 Jan 2025
Posts: 131
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Posts: 131
Kudos: 71
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel this is v tough Q on rounding because we have to come up with range - can you explain it first and share if there are other such questions?
I saw a few rounding q involving decimals, this one is purely integers
User avatar
MalachiKeti
Joined: 01 Sep 2024
Last visit: 27 Jan 2025
Posts: 131
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Posts: 131
Kudos: 71
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[ltr]135,000 ≤ SP ≤ 139,999[/ltr]

[ltr]80,001 ≤ MB ≤ 84,999[/ltr]


[ltr]215,001 ≤ SP+MB ≤ 224,998

Why have we not take 140,000 and 80,000 instead of 139999 and 80001[/ltr]

gmatophobia

sayan640
HI gmatophobia,
Can you please provide your explanation for the 2nd statement in the same way that you explained the first statement ?

I think according to the second statement ,
135000<= S.P <= 139000
80,001 <= M.B <=84999
Hence , 215001<= M.B +S.P <= 223,999

Hence , the combined population of San Pepe and Maple Beach = 220,000 (if rounded to nearest 10,000)

Please correct me if I am wrong .
­
sayan640 - Yes, you are correct. However, a small correction,

\(135,000 \leq SP \leq 139,999\)
\(80,001 \leq MB \leq 84,999\)

\(215,001 \leq SP+MB \leq 224,998\)

Hence, the rounded population would always be 220,000
­
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,720
Own Kudos:
2,258
 [2]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,720
Kudos: 2,258
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Siagar
­I dont understand where you got the maximum possible difference between the actual value and the rounded value can be 5,000?? How did you calculate that number??
Rounded to the nearest 10,000, the populations of San Pepe and of its suburb Maple Beach are 140,000 and 80,000, respectively. What is the combined population of San Pepe and Maple Beach, rounded to the nearest 10,000 ?

Rounding to 10 means 5<= to 9
Rounding to 100 means 50<= to 99
Rounding to 1000 means 500<= to 999
Rounding to 10000 means 5000<= to 9999

Here rounding to nearest 10000 means SP is in the range as
135000 <= SP < 145000

And MB in the range as
75000 <= MB < 85000

(1) The exact population figures of San Pepe and Maple Beach are each within 2% of the rounded figures above.

Here
137200 < SP < 142800 and
78400 < MB < 81600

Upon adding the two we have
215600 < SP + MB < 224400

which gives the nearest 10000 value as 220000

SUFFICIENT.
(2) The approximate population figure for San Pepe was rounded up, whereas the figure for Maple Beach was rounded down.
Again

Here rounding to nearest 10000 means SP is in the range as
135000 <= SP < 140000

And MB in the range as
80000 <= MB < 85000

Upon adding the two
135000 + 80000 <= SP + MB < 140000 + 85000
215000 <= Sp + MB < 225000

giving nearest 10000 value as 220000

Answer D.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,986
 [1]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,986
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatophobia
Rounded to the nearest 10,000, the populations of San Pepe and of its suburb Maple Beach are 140,000 and 80,000, respectively. What is the combined population of San Pepe and Maple Beach, rounded to the nearest 10,000 ?

(1) The exact population figures of San Pepe and Maple Beach are each within 2% of the rounded figures above.

(2) The approximate population figure for San Pepe was rounded up, whereas the figure for Maple Beach was rounded down.

Attachment:
Screenshot 2024-01-13 112600.png

Rounded SP - 140k (so actual varies from 135k <= SP < 145k)
Rounded MB - 80k (so actual varies from 75k <= MB < 85k)

Combined as per these figures, combined pop = 220k

(1) The exact population figures of San Pepe and Maple Beach are each within 2% of the rounded figures above.

So actual SP is within +- 2.8k and actual MB is +- 1.6k
Even if I take the max possible variation in actual values, they will vary from 220k by 4.4k at the most. So they will get rounded up to 220k only.
Hence answer must be 220k and this statement is sufficient alone.


(2) The approximate population figure for San Pepe was rounded up, whereas the figure for Maple Beach was rounded down.

So actual SP was rounded up and the maximum amount that could have been added was 5k.
Actual MB was rounded down an amount more than 0 to less than 5k was subtracted.

Hence the variation in actual from 220k is definitely less than 5k. The rounding down cancels off some part or all or more of the rounding up.
Hence answer must be 220k and this statement is sufficient alone.

Answer (D)

Here are some discussions on rounding rules:
https://anaprep.com/number-properties-r ... -decimals/
https://anaprep.com/number-properties-o ... -rounding/
https://anaprep.com/number-properties-q ... -decimals/
Moderators:
Math Expert
105379 posts
496 posts